line.
>
> Cheers,
> Med
>
>
> De : Aitken, Paul mailto:pait...@ciena.com>>
> Envoyé : jeudi 23 mai 2024 18:31
> À : BOUCADAIR Mohamed INNOV/NET <mailto:mohamed.boucad...@orange.com>>; drafts-expert-review-comm...@iana.org
> <mailto:drafts-expert-rev
Hi, Med,
I still have issue with the same two key parts:
1. This doc refers to unsigned192.
- That is not a native data type of any known computer. It needs to be
defined.
- Reduced-size encoding per RFC7011 does not apply, unless you are
restricting them to 64, 32, 16, and 8.
> Cheers,
> Med
>
> De : to...@strayalpha.com <mailto:to...@strayalpha.com> <mailto:to...@strayalpha.com>>
> Envoyé : lundi 15 janvier 2024 17:17
> À : BOUCADAIR Mohamed INNOV/NET <mailto:mohamed.boucad...@orange.com>>
> Cc : int-...@ietf.org <mai
Please see below.
—
Dr. Joe Touch, temporal epistemologist
www.strayalpha.com
> On Jan 15, 2024, at 12:26 AM, mohamed.boucad...@orange.com wrote:
>
> Hi Joe,
>
> Thanks for the review.
>
> Please see inline.
>
> Cheers,
> Med
>
>> -Message d'origine-
>> De : Joseph Touch via
On Jan 2, 2024, at 9:07 AM, Tommy Pauly via Datatracker
wrote:
>
> Reviewer: Tommy Pauly
> Review result: Almost Ready
>
> Thanks for writing a clear and succinct draft. I only found one issue of note,
> around the registration of the new udpOptions Information Element.
>
> Section 4.1:
> The
