> Please push -09, and I’ll push to the IETF LC.
done
randy
___
OPSAWG mailing list
OPSAWG@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
Hi Randy,
Please see inline …
From: Randy Bush
Date: Thursday, 18 January 2024 at 19:45
To: Rob Wilton (rwilton)
Cc: draft-ietf-opsawg-9092-update@ietf.org
, Mahesh Jethanandani
, Ops Area WG
Subject: Re: AD review of draft-ietf-opsawg-9092-update-08
hi rob,
thanks for review
hi rob,
thanks for review. appreciated.
> (1) p 4, sec 3. inetnum: Class
>
>Any particular inetnum: object SHOULD have, at most, one geofeed
>reference, whether a remarks: or a proper geofeed: attribute when it
>is implemented. If there is more than one, the geofeed: attribute
>
Hi Authors, OPSAWG,
Please see my AD review comments for draft-ietf-opsawg-9092-update-08. My
focus was on the diff between the latest draft and RFC 9092. I only have some
relatively minor comments.
Minor level comments:
(1) p 4, sec 3. inetnum: Class
Any particular inetnum
