Re: [OPSAWG] Proposed Liaison Response to SG11

2024-03-11 Thread Joe Clarke (jclarke)
' , opsawg-cha...@ietf.org , ops-...@ietf.org , rtg-...@ietf.org Subject: Proposed Liaison Response to SG11 Hi OPSAWG, The MPLS working group is discussing sending a liaison to ITU-T SG11 in response to their liaison (https://datatracker.ietf.org/liaison/1869/) originally targeted at OPSAWG

Re: [OPSAWG] Proposed Liaison Response to SG11

2024-03-10 Thread Michael Richardson
Adrian Farrel wrote: > The MPLS working group is discussing sending a liaison to ITU-T SG11 in > response to their liaison (https://datatracker.ietf.org/liaison/1869/) > originally targeted at OPSAWG. I'm not an MPLS person, and I don't do ITU-T, but: > If you feel: > -

[OPSAWG] Proposed Liaison Response to SG11

2024-03-09 Thread Adrian Farrel
Hi OPSAWG, The MPLS working group is discussing sending a liaison to ITU-T SG11 in response to their liaison (https://datatracker.ietf.org/liaison/1869/) originally targeted at OPSAWG. If you feel: - OPSAWG should co-sign - MPLS should butt out - edits are needed Please respond to the MPLS