' , opsawg-cha...@ietf.org
, ops-...@ietf.org , rtg-...@ietf.org
Subject: Proposed Liaison Response to SG11
Hi OPSAWG,
The MPLS working group is discussing sending a liaison to ITU-T SG11 in
response to their liaison (https://datatracker.ietf.org/liaison/1869/)
originally targeted at OPSAWG
Adrian Farrel wrote:
> The MPLS working group is discussing sending a liaison to ITU-T SG11 in
> response to their liaison (https://datatracker.ietf.org/liaison/1869/)
> originally targeted at OPSAWG.
I'm not an MPLS person, and I don't do ITU-T, but:
> If you feel:
> -
Hi OPSAWG,
The MPLS working group is discussing sending a liaison to ITU-T SG11 in
response to their liaison (https://datatracker.ietf.org/liaison/1869/)
originally targeted at OPSAWG.
If you feel:
- OPSAWG should co-sign
- MPLS should butt out
- edits are needed
Please respond to the MPLS