On Thu, Jan 11, 2024 at 7:28 AM wrote:
>
> From: Numan Siddique
>
> This patch series adds incremental processing in the lflow engine
> node to handle changes to northd and other engine nodes.
> Changed related to load balancers and NAT are mainly handled in
> this patch series.
>
> This patch
On Thu, Jan 11, 2024 at 7:33 AM wrote:
>
> From: Numan Siddique
>
> Since northd tracked data has the changed lb data, northd
> engine handler for lflow engine now handles the lb changes
> incrementally. All the lflows generated for each lb is
> stored in the ovn_lb_datapaths->lflow_ref and
On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 10:07 PM Han Zhou wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 11, 2024 at 7:32 AM wrote:
> >
> > From: Numan Siddique
> >
> > ovn_lflow_add() and other related functions/macros are now moved
> > into a separate module - lflow-mgr.c. This module maintains a
> > table 'struct lflow_table'
On Thu, Jan 11, 2024 at 7:32 AM wrote:
>
> From: Numan Siddique
>
> ovn_lflow_add() and other related functions/macros are now moved
> into a separate module - lflow-mgr.c. This module maintains a
> table 'struct lflow_table' for the logical flows. lflow table
> maintains a hmap to store the
On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 8:39 PM Numan Siddique wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 10:53 PM Han Zhou wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 4:23 AM Dumitru Ceara wrote:
> > >
> > > On 1/24/24 06:01, Han Zhou wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Jan 19, 2024 at 2:50 AM Dumitru Ceara
wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>
On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 1:42 AM Ales Musil wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 17, 2024 at 9:13 PM wrote:
>
> > From: Aliasgar Ginwala
> >
> > To avoid invalidating existing certs setup by old version of ovs pki.
> > openssl supports setting ciphers but it fails with ovn as below
> > ovn-controller
On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 10:53 PM Han Zhou wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 4:23 AM Dumitru Ceara wrote:
> >
> > On 1/24/24 06:01, Han Zhou wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jan 19, 2024 at 2:50 AM Dumitru Ceara wrote:
> > >>
> > >> On 1/11/24 16:31, num...@ovn.org wrote:
> > >>> +
> > >>> +void
> > >>>
On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 4:23 AM Dumitru Ceara wrote:
>
> On 1/24/24 06:01, Han Zhou wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 19, 2024 at 2:50 AM Dumitru Ceara wrote:
> >>
> >> On 1/11/24 16:31, num...@ovn.org wrote:
> >>> +
> >>> +void
> >>> +lflow_table_add_lflow(struct lflow_table *lflow_table,
> >>> +
Hi Mohammad,
I'm having a hard time with this one, and mainly it's because of what
the intended semantics of being "paused" are. I could see it argued that
pausing ovn-controller should have the existing behavior. I could see
someone writing a test where they pause ovn-controller specifically
On Fri, Jan 19, 2024 at 6:57 AM Dumitru Ceara wrote:
>
> On 1/11/24 16:33, num...@ovn.org wrote:
> > From: Numan Siddique
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Numan Siddique
> > ---
>
> Hi Numan,
>
> > diff --git a/northd/inc-proc-northd.c b/northd/inc-proc-northd.c
> > index dcce79510a..f7c3d2bcf5 100644
>
Hi Ales,
Acked-by: Mark Michelson
I was ready to point out this doesn't have an accompanying change to
ovn-northd.8.xml . However, looking at the existing documentation, the
match on the LB VIP is already documented. Apparently this was planned
from the beginning but didn't actually make it
On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 1:14 PM Mike Pattrick wrote:
>
> When sending packets that are flagged as requiring segmentation to an
> interface that doens't support this feature, send the packet to the TSO
> software fallback instead of dropping it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mike Pattrick
For some reason,
On 1/24/24 17:39, Aaron Conole wrote:
> Dumitru Ceara writes:
>
>> On 1/23/24 00:11, Mike Pattrick wrote:
>>> The OVN test suite identified a bug in dp_packet_ol_send_prepare() where
>>> a BFD packet flagged as double encapsulated would trigger a seg fault.
>>> The problem surfaced because
On 1/23/24 14:31, Mike Pattrick wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 7:41 AM Ilya Maximets wrote:
>>
>> On 1/22/24 23:24, Mike Pattrick wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 4:10 PM Ilya Maximets wrote:
On 1/22/24 21:33, Mike Pattrick wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 1:47 PM Ilya Maximets
When sending packets that are flagged as requiring segmentation to an
interface that doens't support this feature, send the packet to the TSO
software fallback instead of dropping it.
Signed-off-by: Mike Pattrick
---
lib/dp-packet-gso.c | 73 +
On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 11:14 AM Lorenzo Bianconi
wrote:
>
> Introduce specif flows for E/W ICMPv{4,6} packets if tunnelled packets
> do not fit path MTU. This patch enable PMTUD for East/West Geneve traffic.
>
> Reported-at: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2241711
> Tested-at:
>
Dumitru Ceara writes:
> On 1/23/24 00:11, Mike Pattrick wrote:
>> The OVN test suite identified a bug in dp_packet_ol_send_prepare() where
>> a BFD packet flagged as double encapsulated would trigger a seg fault.
>> The problem surfaced because bfd_put_packet was reusing a packet
>> allocated on
On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 3:28 PM Mohammad Heib wrote:
> add unit test that check validate that sync command
> sync ISB properly
>
> Signed-off-by: Mohammad Heib
> ---
> tests/ovn-ic.at | 43 +++
> 1 file changed, 43 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git
On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 3:28 PM Mohammad Heib wrote:
> This patch implements a basic sequence number protocol
> that can be used by CMS to determine if the changes
> applied to INB are successfully propagated to ISB.
>
> The implementation of this patch relies on OVN-ICs
> instances to update
On 1/23/24 22:47, Mark Michelson wrote:
> Hi Dumitru.
>
Hi Mark,
> Two questions:
>
> 1) Did you mean to title this as "additional additional records?" Or did
> you just mean "additional records?"
>
Well, no, I didn't I just expanded AR without thinking. :)
> 2) Should this include a test?
Bleep bloop. Greetings Mohammad Heib, I am a robot and I have tried out your
patch.
Thanks for your contribution.
I encountered some error that I wasn't expecting. See the details below.
checkpatch:
WARNING: Line lacks whitespace around operator
WARNING: Line lacks whitespace around operator
Hi Ales,
On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 11:12 AM Ales Musil wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 9, 2024 at 2:29 PM Mohammad Heib wrote:
>
>> add unit test that check validate that sync command
>> sync ISB properly
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Mohammad Heib
>> ---
>>
>
> Hi Mohammad,
>
> I have a few comments down
Until now, there has been no reliable for the CMS to detect when
changes made to the INB configuration have been passed through
to the ISB, This commit adds this feature to the system,
by adding sequence numbers to the INB and ISB and adding code
in ovn-ic-nbctl, ovn-ic to keep those sequence
add unit test that check validate that sync command
sync ISB properly
Signed-off-by: Mohammad Heib
---
tests/ovn-ic.at | 43 +++
1 file changed, 43 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tests/ovn-ic.at b/tests/ovn-ic.at
index d4c436f84..535aba7da 100644
---
This patch implements a basic sequence number protocol
that can be used by CMS to determine if the changes
applied to INB are successfully propagated to ISB.
The implementation of this patch relies on OVN-ICs
instances to update the ISB by adding a per AZ a nb_ic_cfg
counter that will be updated
Add basic flow columns to interconnect northbound DB and
interconnect Southbound DB.
Those columns will be used by future patches to add basic
support for Information Flow in OVN interconnect.
Signed-off-by: Mohammad Heib
Acked-by: Mark Michelson
Acked-by: Ales Musil
---
NEWS
Currently, OVN-IC doesn't support a way to tell the end-user when their changes
to the IC-NB database have propagated successfully to the IC-SB Database.
This patch series adds basic support for the sequence number status protocol
that is implemented on the native OVN, with this patch series the
> On 24-Jan-2024, at 8:59 AM, Numan Siddique wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 8:02 PM Naveen Yerramneni
> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> On 16-Jan-2024, at 2:30 AM, Numan Siddique wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 1:05 PM Naveen Yerramneni
>>> wrote:
This patch contains changes
On 1/24/24 06:01, Han Zhou wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 19, 2024 at 2:50 AM Dumitru Ceara wrote:
>>
>> On 1/11/24 16:31, num...@ovn.org wrote:
>>> +
>>> +void
>>> +lflow_table_add_lflow(struct lflow_table *lflow_table,
>>> + const struct ovn_datapath *od,
>>> +
On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 9:44 AM Mohammad Heib wrote:
> Hi Ales,
>
> Yes sure that's what I'm planning to do next, i first wanted to make those
> patches accepted upstream and then update the test case to use
> the sync command, i guess it will be easier to review if send the test
> cases change
Hi Ales,
Yes sure that's what I'm planning to do next, i first wanted to make those
patches accepted upstream and then update the test case to use
the sync command, i guess it will be easier to review if send the test
cases change as a separate patch, what do you think?
On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at
31 matches
Mail list logo
