That's great, thanks for the note.
On Tue, Aug 08, 2017 at 05:13:41PM -0700, Kevin Lin wrote:
> Hi Ben,
>
> I’ve confirmed that the patch fixed my issue.
>
> —Kevin
>
> > On Aug 3, 2017, at 1:57 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 03, 2017 at 01:35:50PM -0700, Andy Zhou
Hi Ben,
I’ve confirmed that the patch fixed my issue.
—Kevin
> On Aug 3, 2017, at 1:57 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>
> On Thu, Aug 03, 2017 at 01:35:50PM -0700, Andy Zhou wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 2:13 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>>> This bug fix still needs a review.
On Thu, Aug 03, 2017 at 01:35:50PM -0700, Andy Zhou wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 2:13 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> > This bug fix still needs a review. Also, Kevin, if you can verify that
> > it fixes the behavior you see, that would also be helpful.
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 06, 2017 at
On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 2:13 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> This bug fix still needs a review. Also, Kevin, if you can verify that
> it fixes the behavior you see, that would also be helpful.
>
> On Thu, Jul 06, 2017 at 04:40:30PM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>> The ovs-ofctl "diff-flows" and
This bug fix still needs a review. Also, Kevin, if you can verify that
it fixes the behavior you see, that would also be helpful.
On Thu, Jul 06, 2017 at 04:40:30PM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> The ovs-ofctl "diff-flows" and "replace-flows" command compare the flows
> in two flow tables. Until
The ovs-ofctl "diff-flows" and "replace-flows" command compare the flows
in two flow tables. Until now, the "replace-flows" command has considered
certain almost meaningless differences related to the version of OpenFlow
used to add a flow as significant, which caused it to replace a flow by an