On Fri, Apr 12, 2024 at 10:33 AM Dumitru Ceara wrote:
> On 4/11/24 10:32, Ales Musil wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 4, 2024 at 11:44 PM Ihar Hrachyshka
> wrote:
> >
> >> Strictly speaking, this is not *essential* to start from MIN and not
> >> MIN+1 (once the hint reaches max, it will wrap back to MIN
On 4/11/24 10:32, Ales Musil wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 4, 2024 at 11:44 PM Ihar Hrachyshka wrote:
>
>> Strictly speaking, this is not *essential* to start from MIN and not
>> MIN+1 (once the hint reaches max, it will wrap back to MIN anyway), but
>> this is inconsistent with how we handle datapath
On Thu, Apr 4, 2024 at 11:44 PM Ihar Hrachyshka wrote:
> Strictly speaking, this is not *essential* to start from MIN and not
> MIN+1 (once the hint reaches max, it will wrap back to MIN anyway), but
> this is inconsistent with how we handle datapath and port keys (we start
> with hint = 0
Strictly speaking, this is not *essential* to start from MIN and not
MIN+1 (once the hint reaches max, it will wrap back to MIN anyway), but
this is inconsistent with how we handle datapath and port keys (we start
with hint = 0 there).
Signed-off-by: Ihar Hrachyshka
---
northd/northd.c | 3 ++-
