Hi everyone,
On Mon, May 13, 2024 at 03:05:47PM +0200, Paolo Valerio wrote:
> Hi Peng,
>
> Peng He writes:
>
> > To seperate into N cmaps, why not use hash value divided by N?
> >
>
> FWIW, I think it makes sense to discuss the potential benefits of other
> approaches as well.
i just
Hi Peng,
Peng He writes:
> To seperate into N cmaps, why not use hash value divided by N?
>
FWIW, I think it makes sense to discuss the potential benefits of other
approaches as well.
They may even end up not being as performant as this one, but also some
points to consider here are:
- the
To seperate into N cmaps, why not use hash value divided by N?
Simon Horman 于2024年5月1日周三 19:06写道：
> On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 02:44:54PM +0200, Felix Huettner via dev wrote:
> > Currently conntrack uses a single large cmap for all connections stored.
> > This cmap contains all connections for all
On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 02:44:54PM +0200, Felix Huettner via dev wrote:
> Currently conntrack uses a single large cmap for all connections stored.
> This cmap contains all connections for all conntrack zones which are
> completely separate from each other. By separating each zone to its own
> cmap
Currently conntrack uses a single large cmap for all connections stored.
This cmap contains all connections for all conntrack zones which are
completely separate from each other. By separating each zone to its own
cmap we can significantly optimize the performance when using multiple
zones.
The
