On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 5:22 PM Yi-Hung Wei wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 11, 2019 at 12:30 PM Darrell Ball wrote:
> >
> > I did some further testing and ran into another issue; in this case,
> one, I did not expect.
> >
> > I added an additional sending of packets at the end of the test after
> this
On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 5:15 PM Yi-Hung Wei wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 11, 2019 at 12:30 PM Darrell Ball wrote:
> >
> > I did some further testing and ran into another issue; in this case,
> one, I did not expect.
> >
> > I added an additional sending of packets at the end of the test after
> this
On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 5:22 PM Yi-Hung Wei wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 11, 2019 at 12:30 PM Darrell Ball wrote:
> >
> > I did some further testing and ran into another issue; in this case,
> one, I did not expect.
> >
> > I added an additional sending of packets at the end of the test after
> this
On Sun, Aug 11, 2019 at 12:30 PM Darrell Ball wrote:
>
> I did some further testing and ran into another issue; in this case, one, I
> did not expect.
>
> I added an additional sending of packets at the end of the test after this
> check:
>
> AT_CHECK([ovs-appctl dpctl/dump-conntrack |
On Sun, Aug 11, 2019 at 12:30 PM Darrell Ball wrote:
>
> I did some further testing and ran into another issue; in this case, one, I
> did not expect.
>
> I added an additional sending of packets at the end of the test after this
> check:
>
> AT_CHECK([ovs-appctl dpctl/dump-conntrack |
I did some further testing and ran into another issue; in this case, one, I
did not expect.
I added an additional sending of packets at the end of the test after this
check:
AT_CHECK([ovs-appctl dpctl/dump-conntrack | FORMAT_CT(10.1.1.2)], [0], [dnl
])
Below is new code
dnl Do it again
dnl
On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 11:07 AM Yi-Hung Wei wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 10:21 AM Darrell Ball wrote:
> >
> >
> > I did some more testing and found a similar problem as in V1.
> >
> > This test can be run successfully once and then fails after that.
> > Maybe you want to look into that. It
On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 10:21 AM Darrell Ball wrote:
>
>
> I did some more testing and found a similar problem as in V1.
>
> This test can be run successfully once and then fails after that.
> Maybe you want to look into that. It is probably related to:
>
> dball@ubuntu:~/openvswitch/ovs$ lsmod |
On Mon, Aug 5, 2019 at 9:03 PM Darrell Ball wrote:
> Thanks for the patch
>
> I see the test is much improved now from V1 and passes - thanks
>
> Ideally, tests should be associated with some code for context
> It could be folded into patch 8
>
I did some more testing and found a similar
Thanks for the patch
I see the test is much improved now from V1 and passes - thanks
Ideally, tests should be associated with some code for context
It could be folded into patch 8
On Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 3:12 PM Yi-Hung Wei wrote:
> This patch adds a system traffic test to verify the
This patch adds a system traffic test to verify the zone-based conntrack
timeout feature. The test uses ovs-vsctl commands to configure
the customized ICMP and UDP timeout on zone 5 to a shorter period.
It then injects ICMP and UDP traffic to conntrack, and checks if the
corresponding conntrack
11 matches
Mail list logo
