Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v4] python: Politely handle misuse of table.condition

2022-04-26 Thread Ilya Maximets
On 4/13/22 15:52, Terry Wilson wrote: > Before 46d44cf3b, it was technically possible to assign a monitor > condition directly to Idl.tables[table_name].condition. If done > before the connection was established, it would successfully apply > the condition (where cond_change() actually would

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v4] python: Politely handle misuse of table.condition

2022-04-26 Thread Timothy Redaelli
On Wed, 13 Apr 2022 08:52:26 -0500 Terry Wilson wrote: > Before 46d44cf3b, it was technically possible to assign a monitor > condition directly to Idl.tables[table_name].condition. If done > before the connection was established, it would successfully apply > the condition (where cond_change()

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v4] python: Politely handle misuse of table.condition

2022-04-13 Thread Dumitru Ceara
On 4/13/22 15:52, Terry Wilson wrote: > Before 46d44cf3b, it was technically possible to assign a monitor > condition directly to Idl.tables[table_name].condition. If done > before the connection was established, it would successfully apply > the condition (where cond_change() actually would

[ovs-dev] [PATCH v4] python: Politely handle misuse of table.condition

2022-04-13 Thread Terry Wilson
Before 46d44cf3b, it was technically possible to assign a monitor condition directly to Idl.tables[table_name].condition. If done before the connection was established, it would successfully apply the condition (where cond_change() actually would fail). Although this wasn't meant to be supported,