Re: [gluster-packaging] Fwd: Bug#873878: glusterfs-client: mount.glusterfs needs bash as /bin/sh

2017-09-01 Thread Kaleb Keithley
I'd prefer to remove the bashisms. - Original Message - > From: "Patrick Matthäi" > To: packaging@gluster.org > Sent: Friday, September 1, 2017 3:36:16 AM > Subject: [gluster-packaging] Fwd: Bug#873878: glusterfs-client: > mount.glusterfs needs bash as /bin/sh >

Re: [gluster-packaging] Fwd: Bug#873878: glusterfs-client: mount.glusterfs needs bash as /bin/sh

2017-09-01 Thread Niels de Vos
On Fri, Sep 01, 2017 at 09:36:16AM +0200, Patrick Matthäi wrote: > Hi, > > how should it be fixed for glusterfs now? Better shell code without > bashishm or do you want /bin/bash as shebang? Do you have a preference? I do not know how much work is it is to rewrite the mount.glusterfs script to

[gluster-packaging] Fwd: Bug#873878: glusterfs-client: mount.glusterfs needs bash as /bin/sh

2017-09-01 Thread Patrick Matthäi
Hi, how should it be fixed for glusterfs now? Better shell code without bashishm or do you want /bin/bash as shebang? Weitergeleitete Nachricht Betreff:Bug#873878: glusterfs-client: mount.glusterfs needs bash as /bin/sh Weitersenden-Datum: Thu, 31 Aug 2017