I'd prefer to remove the bashisms.
- Original Message -
> From: "Patrick Matthäi"
> To: packaging@gluster.org
> Sent: Friday, September 1, 2017 3:36:16 AM
> Subject: [gluster-packaging] Fwd: Bug#873878: glusterfs-client:
> mount.glusterfs needs bash as /bin/sh
>
On Fri, Sep 01, 2017 at 09:36:16AM +0200, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> how should it be fixed for glusterfs now? Better shell code without
> bashishm or do you want /bin/bash as shebang?
Do you have a preference? I do not know how much work is it is to
rewrite the mount.glusterfs script to
Hi,
how should it be fixed for glusterfs now? Better shell code without
bashishm or do you want /bin/bash as shebang?
Weitergeleitete Nachricht
Betreff:Bug#873878: glusterfs-client: mount.glusterfs needs bash as
/bin/sh
Weitersenden-Datum: Thu, 31 Aug 2017