I´m sorry, I didn´t really understand.
You made a subdirectory named Plugins in the -in my case - Paraview/build/bin
directory, you put libMyPlugin.so there and then the Plugin loaded without
using the plugin manager?
greetings,
Natalie
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 10:53:25 +0100
From:
Yes, that is exactly the case with Windows XP. I didn't try yet with my Linux.
Regards,
Jerome
2009/1/21 Natalie Happenhofer natalieh...@hotmail.com:
I´m sorry, I didn´t really understand.
You made a subdirectory named Plugins in the -in my case -
Paraview/build/bin directory, you put
Hi all,
I'm having a problem running paraview when compiling it with a new version
of my compiler.
The compiler I am using is installed in a non common directory. The
compilation goes through without a problem, but when I run ParaView I get
the following :
/usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6: version
Hallo!
Paraview is completely new for me, and I'm struggling with the
CreateRepresentation Proxy in
pvpython...
I did the same thing as written in a paraview manual but it just won't work.
Does someone of you
know why?
from paraview import servermanager connect=servermanager.Connect()
That should also work on Linux. For OS X the Plugins should be in the
ParaView.app bundle at ParaView.app/Contents/Plugins. At least that is
what I remember.
---
Mike Jackson www.bluequartz.net
On Jan 21, 2009, at 6:25 AM, Jérôme wrote:
Yes, that is exactly the case with
Michael
This is a problem specifi to pv-meshless and should not be sent to this
list. pv-meshless is not supported outside of CSCS and our selected
'friends'.
The error you are receiving is because the CSCSCommon plugin is not
being loaded. If you fix that, it should go away.
JB
Hi Jacques,
You should set VTK_USE_RPATH to OFF.
-berk
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 7:18 AM, Jacques Papper jpap...@ara.co.uk wrote:
Hi all,
I'm having a problem running paraview when compiling it with a new version
of my compiler.
The compiler I am using is installed in a non common directory.
Dominik,
What is your compiler version? I couldn't duplicate this on the cvs
head but I have feeling that's because I am using gcc 4.0.
-berk
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 3:40 PM, Dominik Szczerba domi...@itis.ethz.ch wrote:
Below is a fix, fedora 10, hdf5-1.6.8
-- Dominik
--- XdmfObject.h.orig
I've updated the wiki
http://paraview.org/Wiki/Plugin_HowTo#Using_Plugins with the
information of where you can place plugins for paraview to pick them up
automatically without setting PV_PLUGIN_PATH. There's a system-wide
location (if paraview is installed that way), and a user specific
Hi Berk,
Below full version info.
-- Dominik
$ g++ -v
Using built-in specs.
Target: i386-redhat-linux
Configured with: ../configure --prefix=/usr --mandir=/usr/share/man
--infodir=/usr/share/info
--with-bugurl=http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla --enable-bootstrap
--enable-shared
Thank you Berk,
I was looking for a flag like SKIP_RPATH_INSTALL not a specific VTK flag...
Do you know if there is a way of manually setting the RPATH ?
I would like to use RPATH so that I can create releases that do not need the
LD_LIBRARY_PATH but as I explained in my previous mail the wrong
Yes, you need cells to create an isosurface. The cells specify how the scalar
field should be interpolated between points.
The easiest way to impose cells on your points is to run the Delaunay 3D filter
on them.
-Ken
On 1/20/09 8:17 PM, Mare Libero marelibe...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi,
I am
If this is a regular, cartesian grid, you can use image data. If
rectilinear, use rectilinear grid. If this is curvilinear grid, you
can use structured grid. Otherwise, you have to create cells somehow.
-berk
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 10:17 PM, Mare Libero marelibe...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi,
I am
Not that I know of. You may need to ask the CMake list.
-berk
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 10:12 AM, Jacques Papper jpap...@ara.co.uk wrote:
Thank you Berk,
I was looking for a flag like SKIP_RPATH_INSTALL not a specific VTK flag...
Do you know if there is a way of manually setting the RPATH ?
I
I fixed the cvs head so that it compiles with 4.3 after ParaView 3.4
release. I am wondering if the issue Dominik is running into is still
there on cvs head though. If hdf5 was pulling in some headers, and now
it doesn't, some things may still be broken. Dominik, how hard is it
for you to try cvs
Berk Geveci wrote:
I fixed the cvs head so that it compiles with 4.3 after ParaView 3.4
release. I am wondering if the issue Dominik is running into is still
there on cvs head though. If hdf5 was pulling in some headers, and now
it doesn't, some things may still be broken.
I have a clean
To All,
I have searched around a bit for some documentation on this (including
this mailing list), so my apologizes if it has been discussed before.
I am trying to create a simple animation using Paraview 3.4.0. The
animation desired is: a 3D cube rotates for 5 seconds, becomes invisible
Animating the visibility is the right thing to do. If you have not already,
try changing the interpolation from ramp to step. That might be the problem.
-Ken
On 1/21/09 10:39 AM, Jared Hawkins jared.hawk...@tufts.edu wrote:
To All,
I have searched around a bit for some documentation on
Ken,
Thanks for the quick feedback. I have tried this, with no luck yet.
Using this approach, how do you toggle visibility?? Does a value of 0
turn visibility off? If so, what value turns it back on??
Thanks again.
-jared
Moreland, Kenneth wrote:
Animating the visibility is the right
0 turns visibility off. 1 turns visibility on.
-Ken
On 1/21/09 11:20 AM, Jared Hawkins jared.hawk...@tufts.edu wrote:
Ken,
Thanks for the quick feedback. I have tried this, with no luck yet. Using this
approach, how do you toggle visibility?? Does a value of 0 turn visibility
off? If
OK I will try CVS now and report back.
-- Dominik
Berk Geveci wrote:
I fixed the cvs head so that it compiles with 4.3 after ParaView 3.4
release. I am wondering if the issue Dominik is running into is still
there on cvs head though. If hdf5 was pulling in some headers, and now
it doesn't,
21 matches
Mail list logo