Re: [Paraview] building code as part of paraview

2009-01-21 Thread Natalie Happenhofer
I´m sorry, I didn´t really understand. You made a subdirectory named Plugins in the -in my case - Paraview/build/bin directory, you put libMyPlugin.so there and then the Plugin loaded without using the plugin manager? greetings, Natalie Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 10:53:25 +0100 From:

Re: [Paraview] building code as part of paraview

2009-01-21 Thread Jérôme
Yes, that is exactly the case with Windows XP. I didn't try yet with my Linux. Regards, Jerome 2009/1/21 Natalie Happenhofer natalieh...@hotmail.com: I´m sorry, I didn´t really understand. You made a subdirectory named Plugins in the -in my case - Paraview/build/bin directory, you put

[Paraview] Cmake and RPATH

2009-01-21 Thread Jacques Papper
Hi all, I'm having a problem running paraview when compiling it with a new version of my compiler. The compiler I am using is installed in a non common directory. The compilation goes through without a problem, but when I run ParaView I get the following : /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6: version

[Paraview] pvpython problem

2009-01-21 Thread Michael Buchmayr
Hallo! Paraview is completely new for me, and I'm struggling with the CreateRepresentation Proxy in pvpython... I did the same thing as written in a paraview manual but it just won't work. Does someone of you know why? from paraview import servermanager connect=servermanager.Connect()

Re: [Paraview] building code as part of paraview

2009-01-21 Thread Michael Jackson
That should also work on Linux. For OS X the Plugins should be in the ParaView.app bundle at ParaView.app/Contents/Plugins. At least that is what I remember. --- Mike Jackson www.bluequartz.net On Jan 21, 2009, at 6:25 AM, Jérôme wrote: Yes, that is exactly the case with

Re: [Paraview] pvpython problem

2009-01-21 Thread John Biddiscombe
Michael This is a problem specifi to pv-meshless and should not be sent to this list. pv-meshless is not supported outside of CSCS and our selected 'friends'. The error you are receiving is because the CSCSCommon plugin is not being loaded. If you fix that, it should go away. JB

Re: [Paraview] Cmake and RPATH

2009-01-21 Thread Berk Geveci
Hi Jacques, You should set VTK_USE_RPATH to OFF. -berk On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 7:18 AM, Jacques Papper jpap...@ara.co.uk wrote: Hi all, I'm having a problem running paraview when compiling it with a new version of my compiler. The compiler I am using is installed in a non common directory.

Re: [Paraview] 3.4.0 compilation broken due to xdfm / old hdf5

2009-01-21 Thread Berk Geveci
Dominik, What is your compiler version? I couldn't duplicate this on the cvs head but I have feeling that's because I am using gcc 4.0. -berk On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 3:40 PM, Dominik Szczerba domi...@itis.ethz.ch wrote: Below is a fix, fedora 10, hdf5-1.6.8 -- Dominik --- XdmfObject.h.orig

Re: [Paraview] building code as part of paraview

2009-01-21 Thread Clinton Stimpson
I've updated the wiki http://paraview.org/Wiki/Plugin_HowTo#Using_Plugins with the information of where you can place plugins for paraview to pick them up automatically without setting PV_PLUGIN_PATH. There's a system-wide location (if paraview is installed that way), and a user specific

Re: [Paraview] 3.4.0 compilation broken due to xdfm / old hdf5

2009-01-21 Thread Dominik Szczerba
Hi Berk, Below full version info. -- Dominik $ g++ -v Using built-in specs. Target: i386-redhat-linux Configured with: ../configure --prefix=/usr --mandir=/usr/share/man --infodir=/usr/share/info --with-bugurl=http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla --enable-bootstrap --enable-shared

Re: [Paraview] Cmake and RPATH

2009-01-21 Thread Jacques Papper
Thank you Berk, I was looking for a flag like SKIP_RPATH_INSTALL not a specific VTK flag... Do you know if there is a way of manually setting the RPATH ? I would like to use RPATH so that I can create releases that do not need the LD_LIBRARY_PATH but as I explained in my previous mail the wrong

Re: [Paraview] Isosurface

2009-01-21 Thread Moreland, Kenneth
Yes, you need cells to create an isosurface. The cells specify how the scalar field should be interpolated between points. The easiest way to impose cells on your points is to run the Delaunay 3D filter on them. -Ken On 1/20/09 8:17 PM, Mare Libero marelibe...@yahoo.com wrote: Hi, I am

Re: [Paraview] Isosurface

2009-01-21 Thread Berk Geveci
If this is a regular, cartesian grid, you can use image data. If rectilinear, use rectilinear grid. If this is curvilinear grid, you can use structured grid. Otherwise, you have to create cells somehow. -berk On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 10:17 PM, Mare Libero marelibe...@yahoo.com wrote: Hi, I am

Re: [Paraview] Cmake and RPATH

2009-01-21 Thread Berk Geveci
Not that I know of. You may need to ask the CMake list. -berk On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 10:12 AM, Jacques Papper jpap...@ara.co.uk wrote: Thank you Berk, I was looking for a flag like SKIP_RPATH_INSTALL not a specific VTK flag... Do you know if there is a way of manually setting the RPATH ? I

Re: [Paraview] 3.4.0 compilation broken due to xdfm / old hdf5

2009-01-21 Thread Berk Geveci
I fixed the cvs head so that it compiles with 4.3 after ParaView 3.4 release. I am wondering if the issue Dominik is running into is still there on cvs head though. If hdf5 was pulling in some headers, and now it doesn't, some things may still be broken. Dominik, how hard is it for you to try cvs

Re: [Paraview] 3.4.0 compilation broken due to xdfm / old hdf5

2009-01-21 Thread Jean Favre
Berk Geveci wrote: I fixed the cvs head so that it compiles with 4.3 after ParaView 3.4 release. I am wondering if the issue Dominik is running into is still there on cvs head though. If hdf5 was pulling in some headers, and now it doesn't, some things may still be broken. I have a clean

[Paraview] animation with changing visibility

2009-01-21 Thread Jared Hawkins
To All, I have searched around a bit for some documentation on this (including this mailing list), so my apologizes if it has been discussed before. I am trying to create a simple animation using Paraview 3.4.0. The animation desired is: a 3D cube rotates for 5 seconds, becomes invisible

Re: [Paraview] animation with changing visibility

2009-01-21 Thread Moreland, Kenneth
Animating the visibility is the right thing to do. If you have not already, try changing the interpolation from ramp to step. That might be the problem. -Ken On 1/21/09 10:39 AM, Jared Hawkins jared.hawk...@tufts.edu wrote: To All, I have searched around a bit for some documentation on

Re: [Paraview] animation with changing visibility

2009-01-21 Thread Jared Hawkins
Ken, Thanks for the quick feedback. I have tried this, with no luck yet. Using this approach, how do you toggle visibility?? Does a value of 0 turn visibility off? If so, what value turns it back on?? Thanks again. -jared Moreland, Kenneth wrote: Animating the visibility is the right

Re: [Paraview] animation with changing visibility

2009-01-21 Thread Moreland, Kenneth
0 turns visibility off. 1 turns visibility on. -Ken On 1/21/09 11:20 AM, Jared Hawkins jared.hawk...@tufts.edu wrote: Ken, Thanks for the quick feedback. I have tried this, with no luck yet. Using this approach, how do you toggle visibility?? Does a value of 0 turn visibility off? If

Re: [Paraview] 3.4.0 compilation broken due to xdfm / old hdf5

2009-01-21 Thread Dominik Szczerba
OK I will try CVS now and report back. -- Dominik Berk Geveci wrote: I fixed the cvs head so that it compiles with 4.3 after ParaView 3.4 release. I am wondering if the issue Dominik is running into is still there on cvs head though. If hdf5 was pulling in some headers, and now it doesn't,