Re: [Paraview] Suggested format for open unstructured CFD including surface geometry?

Hi BastiL, It isn't going very far at the moment due to other work commitments taking priority. I'll keep you posted on any progress. Regards, Adriano === Adriano Gagliardi MEng PhD Project Scientist Computational Aerodynamics Aircraft Research Association

[Paraview] ParaView 3.6.2

Dear Kitware, Do you have a date set for when there will be a cvs branch for ParaView 3.6.2? Regards, Adriano === Adriano Gagliardi MEng PhD Project Scientist Computational Aerodynamics Aircraft Research Association Ltd. Manton Lane Bedford Tel: 01234 32 4644

Re: [Paraview] How to interpret timer log

Hi all, thanks for the reply below. my friend and i each run parallel rendering using our own notebook as client, but we use the same data, same servers and same version of ParaView, CMake, QT, MPI. We use same settings and did the same thing, however our timer log results are a

Re: [Paraview] ParaView 3.6.2

Adriano, The 3.6.2 release candidate was tagged yesterday. The CVS tag is ParaView-3-6-2-rc1 Utkarsh On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 6:36 AM, Adriano Gagliardi agaglia...@ara.co.uk wrote: Dear Kitware, Do you have a date set for when there will be a cvs branch for ParaView 3.6.2? Regards,

[Paraview] Current state of LiveData

Hi, we have own reader implemented which I want to extend for live data. I found the comment from 2008 that support for live data ist was planned. What is the current state, what do I have to do to implement live data by myself? I plan to read my data by myself via a thread (a good idea) and

Re: [Paraview] Current state of LiveData

This topic has been coming up more and more frequently. This link is to the most recent discussion about it: http://markmail.org/message/734wfelphy3uepjr (search markmail's paraview archive for in-situ, realtime, and/or live data) David E DeMarle Kitware, Inc. RD Engineer 28 Corporate Drive

Re: [Paraview] How to interpret timer log

The only reason why the two systems should give different results is if they are loading different data or the settings do not match up, which you claim is not the case. If you want to ensure that the settings are the same, you can launch ParaView with the -dr flag, which will ignore your

[Paraview] In which version are the Python GUI tools?

Hi, I found http://www.itk.org/Wiki/Python_GUI_Tools and also the In-Situ talk. I just don't have the trace/... buttons in my pathon console for my Paraview 3.6.1 (Linux, 64-bit) ??? Thanks, Fabian ___ Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware

Re: [Paraview] In which version are the Python GUI tools?

The trace functionality is in Paraview 3.6.2, which Uktarsh just informed the list is now available from a cvs branch. See below: Adriano, The 3.6.2 release candidate was tagged yesterday. The CVS tag is ParaView-3-6-2-rc1 Utkarsh === Adriano Gagliardi MEng

[Paraview] Issue with PV 3.7 python bindings: bug or feature?

Hi, in short: When using the 'label' keyword in server manager XML and its value contains parentheses, the according object is missing in python. Is this a bug or a feature? longer version including recipe: Consider ParaView3/Examples/Plugins/Writer, replace its CMakeLists.txt with the

Re: [Paraview] inquiries on parallel pvserver nodes

Hi Ken, Thanks for the swift reply, and for the reminder. forgot to try out the mpirun before trying it out in pvserver. tried a very simple hello world mpi job today. (to no avail) at first, i thought it was because of the difference of 192 and 202 domain which causes the pause, then i applied

Re: [Paraview] Issue with PV 3.7 python bindings: bug or feature?

In recent versions, paraview uses the xml label attribute as the property name in python. It converts the label string to a valid python identifier by calling paraview.make_new_valid(str). The problem is that make_name_valid returns None for names with parentheses. When None is detected the