Btw, we may drop the support for Carbon once we fix all issues related
to the Cocoa build. I don't see why we would support both.
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 3:44 PM, Michael Wild them...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all
I managed to build ParaView CVS with the binary distribution of Qt 4.5.3
(Carbon
Agreed, I just figured until then it would be safer to use the Carbon
version. But I might give Cocoa a try again pretty soon.
Michael
On 22. Oct, 2009, at 1:12 PM, Berk Geveci wrote:
Btw, we may drop the support for Carbon once we fix all issues related
to the Cocoa build. I don't see why
Just compiled with your patch, and it works. There is still the issue
with CFLAGS and CXXFLAGS of course, but that is only a problem for
Carbon builds. However, does the patch for Qt/CMakeLists.txt also work
for older Qt versions?
On 21. Oct, 2009, at 10:35 PM, Clinton Stimpson wrote:
for instance to group all classes developped by myself in a single group?
_
Nouveau! Découvrez le Windows phone Samsung Omnia II disponible chez SFR.
For those interested in subscribing to the developers list:
http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview-developers
-berk
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 3:41 PM, pat marion pat.mar...@kitware.com wrote:
Hi David,
The paraview devel list is paraview-develop...@paraview.org. It used
to be
Hi, y'all -
According to some web pages I found (e.g.
https://visualization.hpc.mil/wiki/Paraview_Tiled-Display_Mode) PV uses
sort-last rendering for tiled displays. If thats true, does it support
displays of 8K width?
Thanks,
Greg
Gregory D. Abram
Texas Advanced Computing Center
JJ Pickle
Hi folks,
The latest edition of the Kitware Source is now available online. The
Kitware Software Developer’s Quarterly Newsletter contains articles
related to the development of Kitware projects in addition to a myriad
of software updates, news and other content relevant to the open
source
You mean each tile has 8K or the whole display is 8K? Ken Moreland
is the Ice-T expert here but I don't think there is any hard-coded
limitation on either sizes. Are you running into a problem?
-berk
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 9:56 AM, Greg Abram g...@tacc.utexas.edu wrote:
Hi, y'all -
According
No, I mean the whole display. I was just wondering since (I think) cards don't
generally support 8K windows, and naively, a simple sort-last algorithm uses
full-size targets for rendering. We have a 15x5 tiled display, and I'm
thinking about running to the whole thing.
Gregory D. Abram
Texas
Ok and is there a place where I could find how to proceed?
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 11:15:04 -0400
Subject: Re: [Paraview] Is it possible to add a new proxy group?
From: berk.gev...@kitware.com
To: stan1...@hotmail.fr
CC: paraview@paraview.org
Yes. But somethings may not work 100% since
What are you trying to do? These classes will be brought into ParaView
under a plugin? If yes, what sort of plugin (simple vs. custom GUI)?
-berk
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 11:20 AM, Fred Fred stan1...@hotmail.fr wrote:
Ok and is there a place where I could find how to proceed?
Date: Thu, 22 Oct
Greg Abram wrote:
We have a 15x5 tiled display, and I'm thinking about running to the whole
thing.
If you do, can you keep us informed if you run into
http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=8464 ?
If not, I'd be very interested to know how your setup differs from mine,
as it seems that
On a related tangent to the rendering issue:
What method is needed to get the 3d view window to refresh.
I have a customized reader panel with a few Qt checkboxes.
When I select, for example, Add Labels, the slot sends it to the server
manager and it is correctly updated.
However, the text labels
Hello,
I've been working with a Maya animator with no success to visualize adcp
data from the Congo River. It's the most amazing dataset, and I want to
share it with others through visualization
I'd like to represent my x,y,z and velocity fields (delta-x, delta-y,
delta-z) in paraview.
The data
Hi all,
i have been trying to combine 2 network's computer to start up pvserver.
to make it simple, let's say i have 3 desktops,
*A* has 2 ehternet cards which are connecting to both 192.168.0 domain and
202.185.77 domain.
*B* from 202.185.77 domain
and *C* from 192.168.0 domain.
while starting
15 matches
Mail list logo
