Hi,
I've got a 3x3x3 set of points, and am trying to show all of the points
individually. My VTK file looks like
# vtk DataFile Version 2.0
Volume example
ASCII
DATASET STRUCTURED_POINTS
DIMENSIONS 3 3 3
ASPECT_RATIO 1 1 1
ORIGIN 0 0 0
POINT_DATA 27
SCALARS volume_scalars char 1
LOOKUP_TABLE
One possible idea would be:
Filters - Alphabetical - Glyphs
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 9:39 AM, n...@toothycat.net wrote:
Hi,
I've got a 3x3x3 set of points, and am trying to show all of the points
individually. My VTK file looks like
# vtk DataFile Version 2.0
Volume example
ASCII
Dear All,
I've still not resolved the issues I've been having with compiling external
filters (not just VTKEdge, although I haven't tried rev. 832 yet) with the
release version of ParaView 3.6.2. Oddly, the problem appears to lie just
with those that use external netCDF libraries and only the SM
Hi,
the same happens if you want to visualize an vtkImageData as points or
surface. Only the outer topological entities are displayed, because of the
mapper internal functionning. See thread unstructured grid + tetrahedrons
in the vtk-users mailing list.
In a nutshell, the outer geometrical
Dear All,
I've managed to get cpack working. I don't know what I did before, but
disabling the VTK_USE_RPATH flag remove the RPATH errors worked this time.
Also, I was receiving a FILES_MATCHING not found error, but removing this
piece of code from Applications/Client/CMakeLists.txt (I believe it
Eric,
If your application wants to install Qt libs, use the following:
#---
SET (qtliblist QTCORE QTGUI QTNETWORK QTXML QTSQL QTHELP QTWEBKIT
QTCLUCENE PHONON QTXMLPATTERNS)
# QTDBUS is Unix only
IF(NOT WIN32)
LIST(APPEND
Ah I think I know why your QT libs are not in the right spot. That being the
FUNCTION(install_qt_libs qtliblist componentname) Macro in
ParaViewBrandingCPack.cmake is using ${PV_INSTALL_LIB_DIR} which probably
isn't defined in your case. We'll get this fixed up.
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 11:11 AM,
Hi,
I have a custom unstructured grid and solution file that is in HDF5.
I was looking into reading this into ParaView and was planning on
using XDMF for this purpose. However, I have run into certain issues
which I am not sure how to address and hence this plea for help:
(1) I have the
FYI, I re-organized the images illustrating the bug, and made a
comparison of nvidia to mesa rendering on two cases 1) the artifacts 2)
the parallel inconsistency, and removed the older images.
1)
http://nashi-submaster.ucsd.edu/movies/PV/tube-filter-artifact/mesa-artifacts.png
Using the dataset below I can reproduce the issue on my workstation
using 4 processes and both hardware and mesa rendering.
burlen wrote:
Ken,
Here is a dataset that I am able to reproduce with:
http://nashi-submaster.ucsd.edu/movies/PV/holes.tar.gz
run with 96 procs. Set the view to +y. If
great. Thanks. I actually have the ParaView User Guide for ParaView 3,
could you point me in the general vicinity in the user guide where
this is explained? The index wasn't much help but I am probably not
looking up the correct terms.
Thanks
--
Mike Jackson www.bluequartz.net
On Jan 15,
woops my bad! I guess I was thinking of chapter 11 13 in the VTK user
guide...
Michael Jackson wrote:
great. Thanks. I actually have the ParaView User Guide for ParaView 3,
could you point me in the general vicinity in the user guide where
this is explained? The index wasn't much help but I
Thanks, that gets the Qt libraries in the proper place.
If you created a ThirdPartyRuntimes component would that automatically pick up
dependencies like the libaudio?
The Ubuntu I'm using has only been used to build ParaView CVS from source, and
so the only non-standard apt-get installs I've
Sree,
1) Make each separate Topology a separate Grid. Then encapsulate
all the grids into a collection :
Grid GridType=Collection CollectionType=Spatial ..
Grid
Grid
2)Use XdmfSet :
Set Name=Ids SetType=Node SetLength=4
DataItem Format=XML
Hey Utkarsh,
Am I pushing on the branding packaging a bit too soon? I had forgotten the
exchanges of last month with the cpack not adapted yet to branding commit?
thread.
I'm excited that it's getting so easy to supply my users with a customized
version of PV, but I can wait on this a bit if
Jerry,
Thanks for the quick answer. I had a follow up question: When I
used what you suggested in (1) below, I found that I had to repeat the
Geometry section for each of grids in the collection. How is this
handled memory wise? Is each of the subgrids going to have a copy of
all the
Hello,
Is there away to configure the client to accept reverse connections from the
entire IP range of a cluster? That is, I don't know which node on the cluster
will be assigned the job ahead of time so I don't know what to put in for Host
in the Configure New Server dialogue. As opposed to
Jerry,
When I am defining a Set as you have in (2) below, is it a
standalone entity or is it part of a Grid? If it is part of a Grid,
does it need to be defined at the "Collection" level or at the
individual "Topology Grid" levels [from (1) below].
I will try to explain my problem in a
I have identified those points which causes problems with the actual
/ParaView3/VTK/IO/vtkNetCDFCOARDSReader.cxx
- if a regular spacing coordinate variable decreases (90 to -90 for
example), you always get a vtkRectilinear grid.
It should reach, wth the computing choice made, to the creation of
This issue persists in Paraview 3.6.2, with which I've just viewed a
relatively small data set (one polysphere and about a 40 line segments).
However, after disconnecting the server, thereby unloading the data,
Paraview's memory consumption remains at 103Mb -- that's not right. Why
isn't
20 matches
Mail list logo