Hi all,
I'm new to paraview. I try to run pvserver on a cluster. The problem is
that I need to ssh twice to get access to the cluster. To use pvserver I
submit a job on the cluster and then I run pvserver using the command
mpirun -np 12 pvserver
then I pick the name and port from terminal and use
Dear ParaView users,
I have created a custom catalyst edition (see attached manifest). It is
basically the same as the Extras-edition with some parts removed. I have
integrated a catalyst adaptor into my application. Everything builds and links
fine. Now I want to use a python coprocessing
Hi,
I will look at this a bit more but I'm wondering if you tried doing the
same with just a full ParaView build and if you did, how did it work?
Regards,
Andy
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 9:42 AM, Lars Bilke lars.bi...@ufz.de wrote:
Dear ParaView users,
I have created a custom catalyst edition
Andy,
I'll let you look into it, but I suspect it's due to the fact that
catalyst needs to tell exactly where the py (and other ParaView
shared libraries) are since the usual mechanism of determine their
locations based on the location of the executable don't apply to
Catalyst.
Utkarsh
On Mon,
This may be of help:
http://www.paraview.org/Wiki/Reverse_connection_and_port_forwarding
Utkarsh
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 5:52 AM, ehsan saei ehsan.s...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I'm new to paraview. I try to run pvserver on a cluster. The problem is that
I need to ssh twice to get access to
It does boil down to using reverse connection and setting up recursive
tunnels so that the pvserver and tunnel back to the client. See the
following on the need for portfwd and how it could potentially be
helpful here.
Hi Ehsan,
As Utkarsh says you need to use a reverse connection. I suggest ncat
http://nmap.org/ncat/ instead of portfwd because portfwd is a long
dead project with no support and it's failed to compile on some systems
I used. Here's a schematic of the setup
[work station] [
Good afternoon all,
I have built ParaView 4.1.0 using Superbuild. During testing I noticed that if
the Server Connection is highlighted in the Pipeline Browser when I click
Disconnect, I see four error messages in the Output Messages window like that
shown below:
ERROR: In
Hi Andy,
thanks for looking into it.
I further noticed that the same error occurs when I use the official
Extras-edition (plus Enable-Python). When using the Rendering-Base-Python
edition everything works.
Best,
Lars
Am 18.08.2014 um 16:26 schrieb Andy Bauer andy.ba...@kitware.com:
Hi,
Thanks Jim - I wrote it up. It is bug 14950.
Alan
From: ParaView [mailto:paraview-boun...@paraview.org] On Behalf Of
jim.el...@awe.co.uk
Sent: Monday, August 18, 2014 10:59 AM
To: paraview@paraview.org
Subject: [EXTERNAL] [Paraview] Error on server disconnect
Good afternoon all,
I have built
Hi Lars,
When you run pvpython can you create the XMLPPolyDataWriter ?
To test this just do:
from paraview.simple import *
w = XMLPPolyDataWriter()
The safest way to test this stuff is to try it with a normal ParaView
build with MPI and Python enabled. If you can link and run against this
then
Burlen,
Very cool. When you get the chance, mind updating the Wiki?
Thanks
Utkarsh
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 12:37 PM, Burlen Loring blor...@lbl.gov wrote:
Hi Ehsan,
As Utkarsh says you need to use a reverse connection. I suggest ncat instead
of portfwd because portfwd is a long dead project
Hi Utkarsh,
Sure I can do that.
Burlen
On 08/18/2014 01:36 PM, Utkarsh Ayachit wrote:
Burlen,
Very cool. When you get the chance, mind updating the Wiki?
Thanks
Utkarsh
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 12:37 PM, Burlen Loring blor...@lbl.gov wrote:
Hi Ehsan,
As Utkarsh says you need to use a
Dear Ehsan,
I use a similar setup as Burlen, tunneling twice over a login node to
our cluster's head node.
It also needs `GatewayPorts clientspecified` in the head node's
sshd_config to work with maximum comfort.
Feel free to check our wiki:
Very cool! Thanks for sharing, Axel. It will be nice to link this page
from the Wiki as a reference/example, if that's okay.
Utkarsh
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 6:12 PM, Huebl, Axel a.hu...@hzdr.de wrote:
Dear Ehsan,
I use a similar setup as Burlen, tunneling twice over a login node to
our
15 matches
Mail list logo
