[Paraview] 550 Neither MX nor MTA found for domain:paraview.org

I get: Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently: paraview@paraview.org Technical details of permanent failure: Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the relay outbounds200.obsmtp.com by ou tbounds200.obsmtp.com. [207.126.147.11]. The error that the

Re: [Paraview] [Paraview-developers] Question on programmable filter

Hi Josh, I've noticed that the default programmable filters does not advertise that it handle time. To properly do that you can use the attached XML plugin. Let us know if that fix the problem. Seb On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 8:48 PM, Joshua Murphy joshua.mur...@lasp.colorado.edu wrote: Hi all,

Re: [Paraview] [Paraview-developers] Question on programmable filter

The Programmable Filter can handle time but it has to be done explicitly. You'll need to do the proper calls in RequestUpdateExtentScript, RequestInformationScript and Script. (i.e. RequestData). You can use inInfo and outInfo to set the required information objections like UPDATE_TIME_STEP,

Re: [Paraview] ParaView Superbuild - changing default Paraciew cmake option

Simon, I am joining a little late to this conversation -- is this addressed yet? Utkarsh On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 11:57 AM, Su, Simon M CTR USARMY ARL (US) simon.m.su@mail.mil wrote: Ben, Unfortunately, when I checked the CMakeCache.txt in the directory paraview/src/paraview-build after

Re: [Paraview] paraview performance

That'd work. You can use the benchmark module [1] too to give you info at a finer granularity. Utkarsh [1] http://www.paraview.org/ParaView3/Doc/Nightly/www/py-doc/paraview.benchmark.html On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 12:12 PM, R C Bording cbord...@ivec.org wrote: Hi, Is there a rendering model

Re: [Paraview] ParaView Superbuild - changing default Paraciew cmake option

Hi Utkarsh, unfortunately I am still not able to pass both argument into ParaView superbuild cmake line using the -DPV_EXTRA_CMAKE_ARGS option that Ben suggested. Any help on this is much appreciated thanks -simon From: Utkarsh Ayachit

[Paraview] [Help!] Paraview GUI does not start (closes automatically)

Hi all, I started using Paraview (4.2.0) about a couple months ago and it was working normally. I don't know exactly when this problem begin because I don't use Paraview everyday but now when I double click on Paraview.exe, no window pops up anymore. Using process monitor, I could see that

Re: [Paraview] [Help!] Paraview GUI does not start (closes automatically)

Try removing your paraview settings. On windows this should be at: %APPDATA%\ParaView\ParaView4.2.0.ini Elsewhere it is at: ~/.config/Paraview/ParaView4.2.0.ini David E DeMarle Kitware, Inc. RD Engineer 21 Corporate Drive Clifton Park, NY 12065-8662 Phone: 518-881-4909 On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at

Re: [Paraview] ParaView Superbuild - changing default Paraciew cmake option

On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 15:57:26 +, Su, Simon M CTR USARMY ARL (US) wrote: Unfortunately, when I checked the CMakeCache.txt in the directory paraview/src/paraview-build after the cmake ran, I am still finding Sorry, this email went under my radar. //Request building vtkIOXdmf3

Re: [Paraview] [Help!] Paraview GUI does not start (closes automatically)

Thanks for the response, David. What you suggested did change the symptom a bit. After I remove the ini file, I was able to see the Paraview logo appear after I execute it, which I did not see prior to the removal. However, the window still doesn't show up. Is there anything else I can do?

Re: [Paraview] 550 Neither MX nor MTA found for domain:paraview.org

On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 12:36:35 +, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently: paraview@paraview.org Technical details of permanent failure: Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the relay outbounds200.obsmtp.com by ou

[Paraview] 4.2.0 stereo interlace problem

Hi. I have not been able to get PV 4.2.0 to work in stereo interlace mode on my Windows 7 64 bit system. Default mode seems to be red-blue, and that works fine, but I get this error on startup when I specify -stereo-type=Interlace ERROR: In

[Paraview] PV 4.2.0 Color legend disappearing

In ParaView 4.2.0, I have found a few cases where the color legend disappears, and I can't get it back. Has anyone else seen this, and found a way to replicate it? Mind passing the voodoo on how to replicate this bug? Thanks, Alan ___ Powered by

Re: [Paraview] [EXTERNAL] 4.2.0 stereo interlace problem

Jean, I just tried with PV 4.2.0, Linux Mesa (local server), Linux hardware rendering, and my local Windows 7 box (Kitware download), and they all worked with -stereo-type=Interlaced. At least I believe they worked, nothing crashed and the image looked good. (Note that the command is

Re: [Paraview] [Help!] Paraview GUI does not start (closes automatically)

David, The problem is now solved. It appears that ParaView does not work with Python 3? Is this true? While I tried calling ParaView from Maltab, I got error message like this: File C:\Python34\Lib\site.py, line 176 file = sys.stderr) ^ SyntaxError:

Re: [Paraview] [Help!] Paraview GUI does not start (closes automatically)

Glad you got it working. And yes it is true that ParaView does not yet support Python 3. David E DeMarle Kitware, Inc. RD Engineer 21 Corporate Drive Clifton Park, NY 12065-8662 Phone: 518-881-4909 On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 10:27 PM, Joe chaoy...@yahoo.com wrote: David, The problem is now

Re: [Paraview] HPC paraview

HI Burlen, Thanks again. Is there and easy way to verify that Paraview is using the GPU ours are TESLA C2075? Should I need to change the MOD(?) setting so it is rendering rather than compute? R. Christopher Bording Supercomputing Team-iVEC@UWA E: cbord...@ivec.org T: +61 8 6488 6905 26

Re: [Paraview] paraview performance

Hi Utkarsh, Is there simple way to see if my installation of ParaView done using the ParaViewSuperbuild is configure with the correct gl libs to run on the GPUs. Should I need to install a version with Mesa to benchmark against or is there a way to that without installing a second version?