Re: [Paraview] Segfault in ParaView 4.4 RC2

Bingo! My Catalyst-instrumented sample code now works like a charm on my VM as well. Thanks a lot for your help. Matthieu From: Utkarsh Ayachit [utkarsh.ayac...@kitware.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 15, 2015 3:21 PM To: Dorier, Matthieu Cc:

Re: [Paraview] Volume Rendering 17GB 8.5 billion cell volume

Thanks for the info – will try the new release with OSMESA next week. Still waiting to get an allocation on our Tesla K40 nodes to test the large dataset with OpenGL2 and hardware rendering. Thanks again, -- David Trudgian Ph.D. Computational Scientist, BioHPC UT Southwestern Medical Center

Re: [Paraview] /usr/bin/paraview not packaged with CPack in Paraview 4.3.1 Superbuild

On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 21:41:09 +, Anthony Crognale wrote: > Looks like building for release worked properly, the resulting > Paraview runs fine now. > > Thanks much for your help! Great! FYI, the release mode improvments are here:

Re: [Paraview] Segfault in ParaView 4.4 RC2

Thanks a lot Utkarsh! In the mean time I tried my code on the Blue Waters machine at NCSA and it works like a charm, so yes, it has to be the VM. I'll try with OSMesa. I don't need the ParaView GUI on the VM anyway. Thanks, Matthieu From: Utkarsh

Re: [Paraview] Plot over Line source

Hey Cory Thanks for the tip with the array [(0,0,0) (0,0,0), (x,y,time),(0,0,0)...(0,0,0)] While this was easy to do, I still get a point in Paraview at 0/0 for each time, or, if I choose to draw a line, one that starts at 0/0 - which is kind of understandable, when looking at my table,

Re: [Paraview] Volume Rendering 17GB 8.5 billion cell volume

Am currently using Mesa 10.5.4 as I’d seen that as a working config mentioned somewhere on the web, so will try newer. Any reason to avoid the 10.6 series? I guess I should also try moving to Paraview 4.4 now :-) -- David Trudgian Ph.D. Computational Scientist, BioHPC UT Southwestern Medical

Re: [Paraview] Volume Rendering 17GB 8.5 billion cell volume

I just realized you are on PV 4.3.1, that version is probably old enough that we did not have OpenGL2 working with Mesa back then. Updating to a more recent PV/VTK will be needed to use OpenGL2 with Mesa (I think we got it working three or four months ago). As far as I know the 10.6 versions of

Re: [Paraview] Volume Rendering 17GB 8.5 billion cell volume

Yes, unsigned short values. DT -- David Trudgian Ph.D. Computational Scientist, BioHPC UT Southwestern Medical Center Dallas, TX 75390-9039 Tel: (214) 648-4833 From: Berk Geveci [mailto:berk.gev...@kitware.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 15, 2015 2:43 PM To: David Trudgian

Re: [Paraview] Segfault in ParaView 4.4 RC2

Matthieu, Simply set the CMake variable OPENGL_glu_LIBRARY to empty. I think you're pointing it to non-existant /home/mdorier/local/mesa/lib/libGLU.so and hence the issue. If I am not mistaken, GLU is optional only required for certain tests. Utkarsh On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 3:26 PM, Dorier,

Re: [Paraview] Segfault in ParaView 4.4 RC2

I compiled and installed Mesa locally (Gallium llvmpipe state-tracker), but when compiling ParaView I get this error: make[2]: *** No rule to make target `/home/mdorier/local/mesa/lib/libGLU.so', needed by `lib/libIceTGL.so'. Stop. It appears that libGLU.so is not built by Mesa. Is this

Re: [Paraview] Volume Rendering 17GB 8.5 billion cell volume

Hey David, I am hoping to have some time to play around with volume rendering and hopefully tracking this issue, one thing that I wanted to clarify: it sounds from you description that you have a short (2 byte) value. Is that correct? Thanks, -berk On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 5:00 PM, David Trudgian

Re: [Paraview] Permissions issue with ParaView-4.4.0-Qt4-Linux-64bit.tar.gz

Thanks for reporting, Eric. I've reported a bug: http://www.paraview.org/Bug/view.php?id=15727 Utkarsh On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 9:36 AM, Eric Nodwell wrote: > Oops, correction to that previous post. The actual fix (bit of a > sledgehammer) is > > sudo chmod -R a+rx

Re: [Paraview] Plot over Line source

Richard, I understand. Sorry, I don't think there is a way to do this. Having an annotation mechanism for your use case might be something we can do in the future, but there are currently no plans to do this that I know of. Best, Cory On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 7:13 AM, no name

Re: [Paraview] Bugs with pvti and pvd

In an attempt to clear my bug backlog, I revisited this issue. I am happy to report that this is now fixed. I am even happier to report that I didn't have to do anything. It seems like our overhaul of the ghost information addressed it. The version I tested is several months all so this is

Re: [Paraview] Segfault in ParaView 4.4 RC2

Matthieu, Good news, I just saw the black window issue too on my build. I'll track it down and get back to you. Utkarsh On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 9:12 AM, Utkarsh Ayachit wrote: > Matthieu, > >> - If I run the application from the VM's graphical interface, it runs

Re: [Paraview] Segfault in ParaView 4.4 RC2

NVM...those were from your original tarball. I thought they were generated as an output from my run :). It's indeed an X issue in both cases. Couple of options: 1. Do a Mesa3D build locally on the VM. Then set LD_LIBRARY_PATH to point to the generated OpenGL libs and run ParaView/Catalyst.

Re: [Paraview] ANN: ParaView 4.4.0 is available for download

Duh, found it … -D Enable_qt4 …. Rick Angelini USArmy Research Laboratory CISD/HPC Architectures Team Phone: 410-278-6266 -Original Message- From: ParaView on behalf of Rick Angelini

[Paraview] Permissions issue with ParaView-4.4.0-Qt4-Linux-64bit.tar.gz

After unpacking ParaView-4.4.0-Qt4-Linux-64bit.tar.gz I was unable to launch it. Attempting to launch it from the command line resulted in: $ /opt/ParaView-4.4.0-Qt4-Linux-64bit/lib/paraview-4.4/paraview /opt/ParaView-4.4.0-Qt4-Linux-64bit/lib/paraview-4.4/paraview: error while loading shared

Re: [Paraview] Permissions issue with ParaView-4.4.0-Qt4-Linux-64bit.tar.gz

Oops, correction to that previous post. The actual fix (bit of a sledgehammer) is sudo chmod -R a+rx /opt/ParaView-4.4.0-Qt4-Linux-64bit/ On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 3:34 PM, Eric Nodwell wrote: > After unpacking ParaView-4.4.0-Qt4-Linux-64bit.tar.gz I was unable to >

Re: [Paraview] ANN: ParaView 4.4.0 is available for download

If I go to the download page , I can download something called '4.4 (Latest Stable)' which to me implies that’s still a development build and not the final production release? http://www.paraview.org/download/ Rick Angelini USArmy Research Laboratory CISD/HPC

Re: [Paraview] ANN: ParaView 4.4.0 is available for download

Hmm...I was using it to point to the "latest stable" release. I suppose I'll just remove the text to avoid confusion fixed. Utkarsh On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 8:27 AM, Angelini, Richard C (Rick) CIV USARMY RDECOM ARL (US) wrote: > If I go to the download page

Re: [Paraview] ANN: ParaView 4.4.0 is available for download

Thanks Utkarsh. That makes it consistent with other production releases are tagged for download …. 8-) Rick Angelini USArmy Research Laboratory CISD/HPC Architectures Team Phone: 410-278-6266 -Original Message- From: Utkarsh Ayachit

Re: [Paraview] ANN: ParaView 4.4.0 is available for download

How do I tell the superbuild to use QT4? Rick Angelini USArmy Research Laboratory CISD/HPC Architectures Team Phone: 410-278-6266 -Original Message- From: Utkarsh Ayachit Date: Tuesday, September 15, 2015 at 9:05 AM To:

Re: [Paraview] Segfault in ParaView 4.4 RC2

Matthieu, > - If I run the application from the VM's graphical interface, it runs fine. > It only gives me the OpenGL warning I mentioned before. BUT the generated > file has a big black area (see image_2.png attached). Also I see a window > appear for a brief moment with the correct (full)