Thanks for the quick responses, Cory
I've created a bugreport: http://www.paraview.org/Bug/view.php?id=15928
On 01/11/2016 06:39 PM, Cory Quammen wrote:
OK, that state file fails for me. Yeah, seems it might be a bug when a
multiblock dataset is used as the Input.
On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at
ULSTEIN GROUP ASA
P.O Box 158, NO-6067 Ulsteinvik, Norway
Tel: +47 7000 8000
www.ulstein.com
-Original Message-
From: Utkarsh Ayachit [mailto:utkarsh.ayac...@kitware.com]
Sent: 11. januar 2016 15:58
To: Thomas Førde
Cc: paraview@paraview.org
Subject: Re:
I am not entire sure what that is, maybe some else on the mailing list
has some ideas.
Utkarsh
On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 8:42 AM, Thomas Førde wrote:
>
> ULSTEIN GROUP ASA
> P.O Box 158, NO-6067 Ulsteinvik, Norway
> Tel: +47 7000 8000
> www.ulstein.com
> -Original
-- Forwarded message --
From: Wes Bethel
Date: Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 5:35 PM
Subject: [hpdav-pc] extended submission deadline: IPDPS workshop High
Performance Data Analysis and Visualization 2016
To: hpdav...@lists.lbl.gov
Apologies if you receive multiple
Dear All!
Sorry for the delay in the reply, but I had a very long Christmas break and I
just came back a few days ago. I managed to compile OpenSWR with Osmesa support
using the autotools but it was not much faster than any of the OSMesa versions
I tried, i.e. v10.5.5 and 11.0.7. I compiled
Hi to all,
I would execute a script on a local machine without on screen rendering.
I have traced the operations with paraview, edited the script and launched with
pvpython. The script generate 200 slices on a volume and save them.
All works as expected, but I would eliminate the on screen
Folks,
ParaView 5.0.0 is now available for download[1]. Checkout the release
notes on the Kitware blog [2]. As always, we look forward to your
feedback [3].
Also stay tuned to the Kitware Blog [4] for upcoming features and
enhancements to ParaView, ParaView Catalyst, ParaViewWeb and much
more!