Re: [Paraview] wall shear stress

2016-10-21 Thread Fande Kong
Still have hard time on this. If anyone in this mail list knows how to do this, I will appreciate for any suggestions. It would be great, if these is a step-by-step example. Regards, Fande, On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 6:54 PM, Fande Kong wrote: > Hi David, > > Thanks very

Re: [Paraview] Any way to select nodes that are inside a volume

2016-10-21 Thread Moreland, Kenneth
Is there any feature of your data that distinguishes the rebar from the larger blob? Do you have a multiblock data with one or more blocks containing only rebar? Do you have field data that might be unique to the rebar such as material type or density? -Ken From: ParaView

[Paraview] Any way to select nodes that are inside a volume

2016-10-21 Thread Dennis Conklin
All, I have a solid blob of elements. Then I have a large cloud of embedded rebars that is much bigger than the solid blob. I only want rebars that are inside the blob.Is there anyway to select only the rebar (truss element) nodes that are inside the solid blob. Like if I extract

Re: [Paraview] ParaView 5.2 Release Candidate 2 available for download

2016-10-21 Thread Ben Boeckel
On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 10:31:00 -0400, David Thompson wrote: > Your attempt to set CMAKE_OSX_SDK=10.12 was probably on the superbuild > project, and it is not passed to the Qt subproject as QT_MAC_SDK. Try > passing the proper value to CMAKE_OSX_SDK (i.e., the full path which > is usually >

Re: [Paraview] ParaView 5.2 Release Candidate 2 available for download

2016-10-21 Thread Fabian Wein
Hi David, you are right, I apply the cmake option for superbuild. This was my first attempt. With an additional -verbose on configure I get Running configuration tests… Failed to process makespec for platform ‚macx-clang‘ Info: creating stash file

Re: [Paraview] ParaView 5.2 Release Candidate 2 available for download

2016-10-21 Thread Cory Quammen
Hi folks, Great discussion. Might I suggest creating an issue in the ParaView issue tracker ( https://gitlab.kitware.com/paraview/paraview/issues) to track progress on building Qt on Mac OS X 10.12 and continuing discussion there? I'd like to reserve this email thread for issues specific to

Re: [Paraview] ParaView 5.2 Release Candidate 2 available for download

2016-10-21 Thread David Thompson
Hi Fabian, Your attempt to set CMAKE_OSX_SDK=10.12 was probably on the superbuild project, and it is not passed to the Qt subproject as QT_MAC_SDK. Try passing the proper value to CMAKE_OSX_SDK (i.e., the full path which is usually

Re: [Paraview] ParaView 5.2 Release Candidate 2 available for download

2016-10-21 Thread Fabian Wein
But your guess was right: xcodebuild -showsdks iOS SDKs: iOS 10.0-sdk iphoneos10.0 iOS Simulator SDKs: Simulator - iOS 10.0-sdk iphonesimulator10.0 macOS SDKs: macOS 10.12 -sdk macosx10.12 tvOS SDKs: tvOS

Re: [Paraview] ParaView 5.2 Release Candidate 2 available for download

2016-10-21 Thread Fabian Wein
Did not work: -DCMAKE_OSX_SDK=macosx10.12 in cmake ../paraview-superbuild -DENABLE_cxx11=ON -DENABLE_hdf5=ON -DENABLE_qt5=ON -Dsuperbuild_download_location=~/tmp/pvsb_downloads -DCMAKE_OSX_ARCHITECTURES=x86_64 -DCMAKE_OSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET=10.12

Re: [Paraview] ParaView 5.2 Release Candidate 2 available for download

2016-10-21 Thread Shawn Waldon
Hi Fabian, CMAKE_OSX_SDK needs to be something like `macosx10.9`. I forget the command to make XCode list the valid sdk versions available. For your case I would guess `macosx10.12` is the correct value. Qt looks up the path to the SDK from that string. HTH, Shawn On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at

Re: [Paraview] ParaView 5.2 Release Candidate 2 available for download

2016-10-21 Thread Michael Jackson
Maybe they mean: /Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/Platforms/MacOSX.platform/Developer/SDKs/MacOSX10.11.sdk or what ever version of macOS works for 10.12? -- Mike Jackson [mike.jack...@bluequartz.net] Fabian Wein wrote: I added a lot of the stuff to the issue tracker. I’m

Re: [Paraview] 3D Unstructured CFD with symmetry plain

2016-10-21 Thread David E DeMarle
Would you mind posting an image or two of some areas where the reflect filters symmetry is not appropriate? That will help us understand the problem and suggest solutions. On Oct 20, 2016 11:54 PM, "Ben Orr" wrote: > Preview Community, > > I am new to the mailing list,