Mark,
Can you share the data (feel free to do it off the mailing list, if
needed)? That will make it easier to understand your problem.
Utkarsh
On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 10:01 AM, Messner, Mark Christian
wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> This is a basic question but I wasn't able to find
Did you type this in a text editor? The first thing I notice is that many of
the quotes are the fancy open/close characters. Many text editors use a “smart
quotes” feature that replaces the straight quote to a bent open or closed
quote. The VTK reader only accepts the straight quotes (ASCII
Hey Guys,
So I understand how to utilize the selection display inspector to visualize
a cell id number. However, is there a way to have the labels associated
with the polydata (or all inside of an vtkAppendPolyData) so that when I
load my .vtp, I automatically see the Cell Ids?
--
This email
Hi,
I am a new user of paraview and try to understand .vtu file format.
Just as a simple test I wanted to create two pieces one solely defines 4 points
and a cell with no attributes, hence forming geometry only. And the second
piece defines only points with point attributes.
However, it seems
I've tested this with the latest ParaView and it does seem to run much
faster.
I am having a problem when running in parallel though. If one processor
does not have anything to display, the rendering hangs.
Related to that, what routine actually calls
vtkCompositeLICHelper::RenderPiece?
The
Hi Shawn,
Thanks for the quick reply. The confusion is indeed unfortunately and might be
cause to consider different names before this becomes a FAQ.
Beyond that, it is a pleasant surprise to see that the 'old' ruler has improved
functionality compared to the 5.0.1 version. The additional
Hi,
Can you share a data set that you are having an issue with?
On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 10:12 AM, sinan shabib
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I apologize,I didn´t explain it well.
>
> I´m using: *Paraview 5.2.0-RC1 , 64 bit.*
>
> All fields data are being read but not visualized, that
Thanks for confirming what I assumed but was not able to fully verify
myself!
With that first smart pointer I would not have "dared" to go because I
would now know whether the output data is already managed by some smart
pointer inside the filter. Meaning that the memory would be released once
Hi Mark,
So the confusion is that there are now two rulers in ParaView. The one
under the filters menu is the one you are seeing. It was added so that the
user could measure the dataset in each dimension (and possibly it could be
extended to selecting other measurements). The older behavior is
Maybe I didn't understand what you were trying to do. Can you be a bit more
specific?
On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 5:46 AM, sinan shabib wrote:
> Hi Andy,
>
> Thanks for your reply.
>
> I think you've mixed my question up with someone else´s.
> I still have the problem with
I don't know if this is a regression or change of feature or what exactly.
Using paraview 5.2.0-g332666c (64bit, linux) and the 'ruler' filter only seems
to have the following properties:
* x/y/z axis enumeration.
That's all. In a previous version (5.0.1) there was also the ability to specify
In general (unless I missed something), it looks fine. A couple of notes:
1. You don't need to even shallow copy, you can simply save the output from
any of the internal filters (I typically use a vtkSmartPointer to hold on
to the reference). e.g.
vtkSmartPointer intermediaResult =
Actually, the feature is slated for 5.4, not 5.3.
ParaView 5.4 is scheduled to come out in June 2017.
Thanks,
Cory
On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 9:05 AM, Cory Quammen wrote:
> Separate axes per filter are not possible in ParaView 5.1.2 or 5.2.0,
> but are slated to be be
Separate axes per filter are not possible in ParaView 5.1.2 or 5.2.0,
but are slated to be be brought back in 5.3:
https://gitlab.kitware.com/paraview/paraview/issues/16878
Cory
On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 12:22 AM, Sundaresan G wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> In paraview, there is
Jean,
(sorry for the delay)
You're of course right :). I created the Python script after the fact,
rather then as I was setting up the filter.
You can add something like the following to the end of the script to update
the timesteps in the UI. (Note, if you use Python Trace to open an data
Dear all,
Would the following construct be safe in terms of proper data handling
inside a filter or would I generate some "unpredictable results", like data
being copied over other data that is still being used?
My purpose is of course to copy data only if it is absolutely required. And
I assume
Hi Anxo,
I don't what the capabilities of the Paraview Ansys reader are, but I don't
think it can read results data, but that may have changed since I last
looked.
Try writing the cdb file as "unblocked" and then renaming the extension as
*.inp. This may get the mesh in to Paraview but not the
Hi Andy,
Thanks for your reply.
I think you've mixed my question up with someone else´s.I still have the
problem with data-visualization (data are read but not visualized).
Andy Bauer schrieb am 19:02 Dienstag, 31.Januar
2017:
Hi,
Please keep the discussion
18 matches
Mail list logo