Re: [Paraview] Paraview crashes with netCDF

Thanks. I actually just created a ticket also, a few minutes after you did: https://gitlab.kitware.com/paraview/paraview/issues/17174 I’ll close mine since it is redundant with yours. -- Adam From: "Moreland, Kenneth" Date: Monday, February 13, 2017 at 4:01 PM To:

[Paraview] Automating contour isosurface values in parallel Catalyst Python script

Hello, I'm in the process of migrating some VTK scripts in the Code_Saturne (code- saturne.org) test suite to Catalyst Python scripts, and am having some difficulty automating some cases using contour plots: For time-dependent data, I do not know the value ranges in advance, and would like to

Re: [Paraview] Paraview crashes with netCDF

Adam, Was able to replicate your problem. It looks like there are minor issues with both gdalwarp and ParaView that together are causing the crash. The first problem is that gdalwarp is not writing the units attribute correctly when outputting the coordinates in feet. Instead, the units are

Re: [Paraview] ParaView 5.3.0 Release Candidate 1 binaries are available for download

There are a couple known issues in ParaView 5.3.0-RC1 that we plan to address in the next release candidate: * The Mac OS X binary was built and packaged with Qt4 instead of Qt5 * On Mac OS X, the included BDATReader, BDATSeriesReader, and GLGPUVortexFilter will not load (Issue 17170) * On Mac OS

Re: [Paraview] (no subject)

On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 14:16:03 -0500, Bishwajit Dutta wrote: > http://midas3.kitware.com/midas/api/rest?method=midas.bitstream.download=b10bd3f7136ef809f1df7ad5c94c553f=MD5 > ("Couldn't connect to server") > > http://www.paraview.org/files/ExternalData/MD5/b10bd3f7136ef809f1df7ad5c94c553f >

Re: [Paraview] (no subject) 5.0.0 Compilation issue

Adding subject On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 2:16 PM, Bishwajit Dutta wrote: > Hi All, > > I am trying to compile Paraview 5.0.0 on Ubuntu 14.04 but I am running > into the below compilation issue. My machine is connected to the network (I > tested it). > Is there something wrong with

[Paraview] (no subject)

Hi All, I am trying to compile Paraview 5.0.0 on Ubuntu 14.04 but I am running into the below compilation issue. My machine is connected to the network (I tested it). Is there something wrong with the kitware URLs? logs-- CMake Error at

Re: [Paraview] Object rendering problem on Windows 7 with Paraview 5.2

Awesome, thanks for the follow up, Bill. On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 12:36 PM, Bill Greene wrote: > Thanks for the suggestions! I downloaded the drivers directly from ATI > instead of letting Windows do the update and that appears to have > fixed the problem I was seeing in

Re: [Paraview] Object rendering problem on Windows 7 with Paraview 5.2

Thanks for the suggestions! I downloaded the drivers directly from ATI instead of letting Windows do the update and that appears to have fixed the problem I was seeing in Paraview 5.2. Thanks again for the help! Bill On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 11:54 AM, Ken Martin wrote: >

Re: [Paraview] Object rendering problem on Windows 7 with Paraview 5.2

That card should be fine. I have seen this type of bug before and updating the driver has fixed it. Specifically updating the driver to the latest from ATI (sometimes computer vendors stop updating their copies). Another way to check what the problem is, is to stick a polydata normals filter in

[Paraview] ParaView 5.3.0 Release Candidate 1 binaries are available for download

Folks, Binaries and source code zip files and tar balls for ParaView 5.3.0 Release Candidate 1 are now available for download from http://www.paraview.org/download/ Please let us know if you run into any problems with this release candidate. Sincerely, Cory -- Cory Quammen Staff R Engineer

Re: [Paraview] Object rendering problem on Windows 7 with Paraview 5.2

Hi Bill, Let's keep the discussion on the mailing list so others can benefit from and contribute to the conversation. Ken, Is the ATI Radeon HD 4200 too old for the OpenGL2 backend? It's circa 2010, I believe. It looks like it can support OpenGL 3.2 with Shader 4.1. I'm wondering if there is

Re: [Paraview] Cataylst pipeline not updating

Hi Tim, It's possible that there's something funky going on when the data set being passed through parts of the pipeline are empty. I'm hoping for the easy fix with passing in the time since I've know that has caused unexpected behavior before. If that doesn't solve your issue then I'll probably

Re: [Paraview] Paraview crashes with netCDF

I found a bit more information. When pareview crashes, here is part of the crash log: Application Specific Information: terminating with uncaught exception of type std::out_of_range: basic_string abort() called Thread 0 Crashed:: Dispatch queue: com.apple.main-thread 0 libsystem_kernel.dylib

Re: [Paraview] Object rendering problem on Windows 7 with Paraview 5.2

Hi Bill, It sounds like the rendering backend isn't fully supported on your graphics card/driver combo. What kind of card is it? Are you getting any error messages? Thanks, Cory On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 11:09 AM, Bill Greene wrote: > I have been using Paraview 4 on my

[Paraview] Object rendering problem on Windows 7 with Paraview 5.2

I have been using Paraview 4 on my windows 7 computer for quite a while now but wanted to upgrade to Paraview 5. Installation appeared to work fine but when I display a model I am seeing a rendering problem that I don't see in Paraview 4. If Representation=Surface and Coloring=Solid Color, the

Re: [Paraview] Cataylst pipeline not updating

The RequestDataDescription is the same as the default output from the script generator, so I didn't include it. The DoCoProcessing gets called every time step and the volumeIntegrals data is updated and written correctly every delta_t, so I'm confident in that part. I will add the calls you

Re: [Paraview] Cataylst pipeline not updating

Oops, datadescription.GetTime() instead of datadescription.GetCurrentTime(). On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 10:56 AM, Andy Bauer wrote: > Hi Tim, > > Try adding in the current time to the UpdatePipeline() calls, e.g. > *.UpdatePipeline(datadescription.GetCurrentTime()) > > It's

Re: [Paraview] Cataylst pipeline not updating

Hi Tim, Try adding in the current time to the UpdatePipeline() calls, e.g. *.UpdatePipeline(datadescription.GetCurrentTime()) It's tough to tell with RequestDataDescription() missing but I assume that DoCoProcessing() is getting called when you want, correct? Let me know if that doesn't solve

Re: [Paraview] PVSB 5.2: missing modules and plugins after "make install"

On Sat, Feb 11, 2017 at 17:48:27 -0500, Cory Quammen wrote: > Will updating to the current superbuild master address the missing > plugins issue Michel is seeing? It looks like there have been some > minor changes on plugin handling in linux since > 4ec37480a6f1ad39c9aa3168c2f0e6a1b0147b16. Yes,

Re: [Paraview] [Non-DoD Source] XDMF makes paraview crash with JOIN

In Xdmf3's reader, the assignment of variables occurs in XdmfArray::populateItem. The evaluation of the function occurs in XdmfFunction "|" denotes XdmfFunction::chunk (effectively concatenate). From there it should be a bunch of XdmfArray::insert calls. Xdmf3's source in Paraview is under

Re: [Paraview] what is the difference between OpenGL rendering backend and OpenGL2 rendering backend when they communicate with the X Window System?

OPenGL 4.4 is plenty and that card should support the new backend. My first thought would be to try updating the nvidia driver as it is pretty old. On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 5:23 AM, 张驭洲 wrote: > > > Hello, > > For a long time I have a problem using ParaView 5.2.0 in the

[Paraview] Cataylst pipeline not updating

Back with another question! I have a pipeline that has 1 input and 4 outputs. The simplest is a IntegrateVariables filter hooked up to the input. Another branch of the pipeline goes through several PythonCalculator filters and a CellDataToPointData filter and then arrives at the three

[Paraview] what is the difference between OpenGL rendering backend and OpenGL2 rendering backend when they communicate with the X Window System?

Hello, For a long time I have a problem using ParaView 5.2.0 in the client-server mode. However, at the same time, I can use ParaView 4.4.0 in this mode on the same machine. Recently I have built several different versions of ParaView, including 4.3.1, 4.4.0, 5.1.2, 5.2.0, on the same

[Paraview] Web3D 2017 ACM conference - Papers Deadline Extended to 27 Feb 2017

Dear All, Sorry for multiple postings. The deadline for scientific and technical communications to Web3D 2017 is extended to 27th February 2017. Scientific, medical visualization with VR and/or thanks/on the web are tremendous topics! Submissions of Papers, posters and proposals for workshops