Ken and Richardson CFD;
Mapping data from a 3-D mesh to a 2-D surface that transects the
3-D mesh is very much of interest to me, particularly, with
respect to STL 2-D surface definitions in 3-space. (My
concern is with unstructured mesh simulations of
That should work. Is it possible that the physical space of the two geometries
do not overlap? Go to the information panel and look at the Bounds for the
scalar field and the surface geometry. The bounds should overlap. If they do
not, then you can use the Transform filter to move/scale one or
(Responding back to the group.)
Well, that's strange. That should work.
I notice that you originally said your scalars are in a structured grid, but
the top of your data file says it is an unstructured grid. An unstructured grid
can represent anything, so is there a possibility it does not
