On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 06:45:47 +0100, Christoph Grüninger wrote:
let me rephrase my question:
Is it save to add /usr/share/cmake/hdf5/ within the ParaView package? Or
would it affect a HDF5 package?
It would likely conflict with a native HDF5 package. Is there a reason
the system HDF5 isn't
Hi Ben,
let me rephrase my question:
Is it save to add /usr/share/cmake/hdf5/ within the ParaView package? Or
would it affect a HDF5 package?
I am unsure, whether /usr/share/paraview/hdf5.setting wouldn't be safer.
But I am alien to HDF5 and might be wrong.
Bye
Christoph
Hi Christoph,
How are you building the packages?
I'm building packages for paraview 4.2.0 and 4.3.1 on the openSUSE
Build Service. If you want to compile ParaView with specific options
you can copy my spec file and start from there:
Hi Armin,
How are you building the packages?
with openSuse's buildservice. I branched the official ParaView
package which is still ParaView 4.2 and tried to update it. After
I replaced the sources and adjusted the spec file, I got the
mentioned error.
By quickly scanning your spec file, I
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 13:10:01 +0100, Christoph Grüninger wrote:
How are you building the packages?
with openSuse's buildservice. I branched the official ParaView
package which is still ParaView 4.2 and tried to update it. After
I replaced the sources and adjusted the spec file, I got the
Hi ParaView devs,
I tried to build a openSuse RPM for ParaView 4.3.1 but I get the
following error. I guess it is related to ParaView's CPack scripts:
[ 6390s] Checking for unpackaged file(s): /usr/lib/rpm/check-files
/home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/paraview-4.3.1-30.1.x86_64
[ 6390s] error:
