Re: [Paraview] Improving vtkDataArraySelection ... and a question of the general philosophy

2009-11-10 Thread Olesen, Mark
It seems that this might apply more to ParaView than I originally suspected. I've modified my usage of vtkDataArraySelection to use vtkDataArraySelection::SetArraysWithDefault(const char *const * ...), which is a fairly roundabout means of adding new items to a list without this-Modified()

Re: [Paraview] Improving vtkDataArraySelection ... and a question of the general philosophy

2009-11-09 Thread Utkarsh Ayachit
Forwarding this to the vtk-developer's list. Utkarsh -- Forwarded message -- From: Mark Olesen mark.ole...@emcontechnologies.com Date: Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 10:21 AM Subject: [Paraview] Improving vtkDataArraySelection ... and a question of the general philosophy To: ParaView

Re: [Paraview] Improving vtkDataArraySelection ... and a question of the general philosophy

2009-11-09 Thread Olesen, Mark
Forwarding this to the vtk-developer's list. Utkarsh Thanks, does this mean that I should subscribe and post there, or just cross-post from here (Paraview)? /mark -- Forwarded message -- From: Mark Olesen mark.ole...@emcontechnologies.com Date: Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 10:21

[Paraview] Improving vtkDataArraySelection ... and a question of the general philosophy

2009-11-04 Thread Mark Olesen
I was looking at making some minor tweaks to vtkDataArraySelection and started wondering why some things are being done the way they are. First off I'll explain what I wanted. I'd like an additional method int AddArray(const char* name, int defaultStatus); The behaviour is as per