Hello,
I recently tried to create a large animation using parallel paraview with 40
cores, but I received this error:
"ERROR: In paraview/paraview-v5.4.1/VTK/Common/Core/vtkGenericDataArray.txx,
line 442
vtkIdTypeArray(0x2aaabc66a8e0): Unable to allocate 131071 elements of size 8
bytes."
Sounds like a network issue. Try telnetting to the port 1 on
nef066 to see if you can indeed connect to that port.
Utkarsh
On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 8:35 AM, Stephen Wornom stephen.wor...@inria.fr wrote:
I launch the paraview server on nef using 32 xeon cores. I am using the
64-bit PV.
The
I launch the paraview server on nef using 32 xeon cores. I am using the
64-bit PV.
The server is listening on nef066. Paraview 3.14.1 has been install from
the source and has been used successfully until now.
Next I start paraview 3.14.1 (binary version) on my workstation.
When I connect I get
Hello,
I have compiled paraview from the git repo with MPI support on my Linux
64-bit machine (openmpi 1.5.4). I can start Paraview with multiple
processors, but when I try to open one of my result files I get the
following error and Paraview is closed automatically:
ERROR: In
John,
Thanks for responding. I have not tried any of the previous releases,
but I'll see what I can do. I'll also try running in a debugger.
In the meantime, on a few of my crashes, I got a stack trace. I've
included it, below. Any thoughts?
-Paul
Biddiscombe, John A. wrote:
Paul
Any
What version of Mesa is this? For newer versions, make sure you follow
these instructions carefully:
http://www.paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView_And_Mesa_3D
Utkarsh
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 12:26 PM, Paul Urbanczyk urbancz...@llnl.gov wrote:
John,
Thanks for responding. I have not tried any of the
Paul
Any help is greatly appreciated!!
Your only real chance is to attach a debugger to the pvservers and see where it
is crashing (and why). Without knowing that, it could be caused by any number
of things.
Did the same data work in previous releases?
JB
Hello,
I've been having trouble using parallel paraview to process EnSight
data, and am hoping someone on this list might help. I've done a lot of
searching through the archives, and seen similar problems, but have not
been able to track down how they were solved or what the cause was.
My
not understand why this should confuse D3, at least I would
expect any confusion to be the same in either case ?
Martin Ausnkjaer
--- Den tors 24/9/09 skrev Moreland, Kenneth kmo...@sandia.gov:
Fra: Moreland, Kenneth kmo...@sandia.gov
Emne: Re: [Paraview] Parallel ParaView: inexplicable results
IDs. Therefore, I swapped the order of the
filters thinking this would correct matters. But it only did so in case 1.
-Martin
--- Den man 28/9/09 skrev Moreland, Kenneth kmo...@sandia.gov:
Fra: Moreland, Kenneth kmo...@sandia.gov
Emne: Re: [Paraview] Parallel ParaView: inexplicable results
I am getting the infamous warning
Display is not accessible on the server side.
Remote rendering will be disabled.
whenever I start PV in client/server mode. This is because the remote pvservers
cannot connect to the local X servers. The only way I have been able to get rid
of it is to
Moreland, Kenneth wrote:
Actually, timestep does support floating point values. If you just
change the “time” parameters to “timestep”, it should work.
-Ken
Thanks yours and Utkarsh's help.
Stephen
On 9/14/09 8:59 AM, Utkarsh Ayachit utkarsh.ayac...@kitware.com wrote:
PVD file does
Actually, timestep does support floating point values. If you just change the
time parameters to timestep, it should work.
-Ken
On 9/14/09 8:59 AM, Utkarsh Ayachit utkarsh.ayac...@kitware.com wrote:
PVD file does not support time attribute, only timestep which has
to be an integer. Try
PVD file does not support time attribute, only timestep which has
to be an integer. Try replacing time with timestep and change the
values to 0,1,2 resp. Does that help?
Utkarsh
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 10:25 AM, Stephen Wornom
stephen.wor...@sophia.inria.fr wrote:
I regularly use paraview in
processor specified?
thx a lot,
Natalie
Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2009 10:49:49 -0500
Subject: Re: [Paraview] Parallel Paraview
From: dave.dema...@kitware.com
To: natalieh...@hotmail.com
CC: paraview@paraview.org
Slightly less briefly than what Ken said:
In parallel, the end of the pipeline on each
Natalie Happenhofer wrote:
Ok, thanks a lot, I believe I understand..
But that brings me to another question:
I´m running paraview on 8 nodes, and my data is sliced into 8 pieces,
which I can see when it´s rendering or with the ProcessId-Filter. In
my case, its a cuboid and it´s divided into
processor, i.e I want to
slice the data into 8 pieces, but slicing it 7 times in the xy-layer. How
can I achieve this, where are the domains for each processor specified?
thx a lot,
Natalie
Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2009 10:49:49 -0500
Subject: Re: [Paraview] Parallel Paraview
From: dave.dema...@kitware.com
In brief, the cells of the data are distributed amongst the processes, and each
process runs your algorithm on its local piece. Algorithms that perform
per-cell or per-point operations usually work without any communication
(assuming the request and receive any necessary ghost cells).
You can
Slightly less briefly than what Ken said:
In parallel, the end of the pipeline on each processor is told to
process piece i out of j. Where i is the local processor's rank and j
is the number of processors. See
vtkStreamingDemandDrivenPipeline::SetUpdatePiece() and
SetNumberOfPieces(). That
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Biao She
Sent: Monday, August 18, 2008 5:35 PM
To: paraview@paraview.org
Subject: [Paraview] Parallel Paraview
Hi there.
I successfully installed paraview with MPI support and managed to connect to
the server. But the speed is strangely slow.
I got the following
20 matches
Mail list logo
