Hmm, I had tested it on XP with PV 3.8.1 and didn't have any problems.
sorry about that, I'll have to try again.
Burlen
On 04/14/2011 07:54 PM, David Partyka wrote:
Hi Burlen, I had to revert your patch as it doesn't compile on Windows..
You will have to make sure it compiles there as well
Hey Burlen, David Gobbi just made some fixes to this and checked it into VTK
moments ago.
http://vtk.org/gitweb?p=VTK.git;a=commitdiff;h=d2a1fb9c5dd99830ad3cdfb753dcdd0e77268799
http://vtk.org/gitweb?p=VTK.git;a=commitdiff;h=d2a1fb9c5dd99830ad3cdfb753dcdd0e77268799
That would be great! Thanks Daves.
On 04/15/2011 11:46 AM, David Partyka wrote:
Hey Burlen, David Gobbi just made some fixes to this and checked it
into VTK moments ago.
http://vtk.org/gitweb?p=VTK.git;a=commitdiff;h=d2a1fb9c5dd99830ad3cdfb753dcdd0e77268799
Looks like David Gobbi's change did the trick. I'll merge that into release
so it will be part of the next releases of ParaView/VTK.
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 2:56 PM, Burlen Loring blor...@lbl.gov wrote:
That would be great! Thanks Daves.
On 04/15/2011 11:46 AM, David Partyka wrote:
Hey
Thanks Burlen, This is applied for 3.10.2.
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 2:11 PM, Burlen Loring blor...@lbl.gov wrote:
Thanks Dave,
Filed the bug report http://www.paraview.org/Bug/view.php?id=12087
I updated the patch for 3.10.0 as well (attached here and on the bug
report).
Burlen
On
Hi Burlen, I had to revert your patch as it doesn't compile on Windows..
You will have to make sure it compiles there as well and resubmit your
patch. If you need any help please let me know. Thanks.
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 3:51 PM, David Partyka david.part...@kitware.comwrote:
Thanks Burlen,
Hi Dave,
What is the status on this?
Burlen
On 02/27/2011 02:53 PM, David Partyka wrote:
Thanks Burlen, We'll take a look.
On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 5:18 PM, Burlen Loring blor...@lbl.gov
mailto:blor...@lbl.gov wrote:
Hi,
While installing ParaView on Nautilus,
Humm, I forgot all about this email. I'll stick it in right now for 3.10.2.
If you don't mind please file a bug so that it isn't forgotten.
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 2:17 PM, Burlen Loring blor...@lbl.gov wrote:
Hi Dave,
What is the status on this?
Burlen
On 02/27/2011 02:53 PM, David
