On 04/09/2015 08:49 AM, Ben Boeckel wrote:
On Thu, Apr 09, 2015 at 09:40:16 -0400, Ben Boeckel wrote:
Doesn't seem so. Looks like ParaView will need changes for 2.6.0.
Searching around, seems like the changes necessary for it are probably
minor[1].
An attempt at this:
On Thu, Apr 09, 2015 at 09:40:16 -0400, Ben Boeckel wrote:
Doesn't seem so. Looks like ParaView will need changes for 2.6.0.
Searching around, seems like the changes necessary for it are probably
minor[1].
An attempt at this:
https://gitlab.kitware.com/paraview/paraview/merge_requests/52
On Wed, Apr 08, 2015 at 19:36:28 -0700, Kevin Dean wrote:
vtkPVMessage.proto:65:14: Message extensions cannot have required fields.
vtkPVMessage.proto:68:14: Message extensions cannot have required fields.
vtkPVMessage.proto:103:14: Message extensions cannot have required fields.
hey, my name is Kevin.
I am currently running into a problem with building against my system's
protobuf libraries for 2.6.0. I have been able to successfully build
against 2.4.1.
However, I now receive this:
vtkPVMessage.proto:65:14: Message extensions cannot have required fields.
