Thanks, I would really appreciate this feature.
I'm looking forward to 5.2 then. :)
-Armin
On Wed Jun 22 23:42:11 2016 GMT+0300, Utkarsh Ayachit wrote:
> Currently, it's not exposed to Python. It's on the TODO list to get
> that fixed for 5.2.
>
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 12:03 PM, Armin
Hello,
I have a file with certani values of p and T. I want to export to a .e file
that data, but also the boundaries of my mesh (keeping the names and the
definition).
Does anyone know how to do this?
My .e file contain all the data but not the boundaries. I need the boundaries
to start
thank you Utkarsh. Your fix works like a charm.
Regards,
Dean
On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 11:56 AM, Utkarsh Ayachit <
utkarsh.ayac...@kitware.com> wrote:
> Attached a fixed version. I've also change the "Script" to just print
> the value for sFields which is a array of selected array names. You'll
This patch fixes the remote-rendering issue in the new peeling
implementation:
https://gitlab.kitware.com/vtk/vtk/merge_requests/1589
Cheers,
Dave
On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 6:06 AM, Paluszek, Lukasz <
lukasz.palus...@airbus.com> wrote:
> Switching to the old peeling implementation did the trick,
Attached a fixed version. I've also change the "Script" to just print
the value for sFields which is a array of selected array names. You'll
need to update your code accordingly. Note, if the user selected
nothing then sFields will not be defined. So you may want to handle
that in your code as
Fellas, can someone please point me to examples (current as of v5.0.1) of
how a PythonProgrammableFilter accesses the values of properties entered
via a DropDownList on the filter's Properties panel
I have written a Python programmable filter which extracts user-specified
field arrays from
Paul,
Can you try this:
1. Connect to pvserver started with --use-offscreen-rendering
2. From Edit | Settings, Render View tab, set "Remote Render
Threshold" to 0. Accept the change using OK.
3. Interact with render view.
Do you get the same segfault? If so, it's independent of what you're
On 06/27/2016 05:29 PM, Paul Melis wrote:
On 04/19/2016 01:04 PM, Paul Melis wrote:
Hi Utkarsh,
On 18-04-16 20:04, Utkarsh Ayachit wrote:
This has always worked for me with earlier versions of
ParaView, but something seems to have changed. It could be the
newer NVidia
driver we use since a
On 04/19/2016 01:04 PM, Paul Melis wrote:
Hi Utkarsh,
On 18-04-16 20:04, Utkarsh Ayachit wrote:
This has always worked for me with earlier versions of
ParaView, but something seems to have changed. It could be the newer
NVidia
driver we use since a few weeks, but like I said, I don't see
Stephen,
Does not ParaView's Extract Surface filter give what you are
looking to obtain?
The result of the Extract Surface filter can also be trimmed
visa the Clip filter.
Sam
On 6/27/2016 2:14 AM, Stephen Wornom
wrote:
Do you have a sample dataset to share to reproduce this issue? Also
what version of ParaView are you trying this with?
On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 4:32 PM, Jim wrote:
> I can import (raw binary) a 3D file (1178x1202x1000x1float), extract a
> subset and display it using
Switching to the old peeling implementation did the trick, no more issues and
yes I am using remote rendering via pvserver.
[Beschreibung: Beschreibung: Description : cid:image001.png@01CF0B8F.DB7831F0]
Łukasz Paluszek
Airbus Helicopters
Aerodynamics Department (ETGA)
86607 Donauwörth
Germany
The mesh is 3D unstructured about a 3D cylinder. I would like to extract the
surface of the cylinder.
I have experience extracting surfaces with another code where the surfaces are
defined by a variable (-3= cylinder surface).
I do it like this:
1-select extract surface
2-select
13 matches
Mail list logo