Re: [Paraview] Surface LIC contrast enhancement invalid range

Andy, Surface LIC is now supported with 5.1.2 . Can you try it out and let us know if you see the same issue? Thanks, Utkarsh On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 1:22 PM, Andy Smith wrote: > A colleague of mine is having an issue using Surface LIC in ParaView 4.4: > > > I am having

[Paraview] pvbatch hangs when enabling OSPRay

Hello, I've compiled Paraview 5.1 with multithreaded mpi and ospray (with OpenMP) support using the next modules: 1) gcc/4.8.25) xalt/0.5.3 9) szip/2.1 13) boost/1.61.0 2) openmpi/1.8.4_mtm6) DefApps 10) hdf5/1.8.11 14) libtool/2.4.2 3)

Re: [Paraview] capability of ParaView, Catalyst in distributed computing environment ...

Hi Andy, Thanks for your help. You can find the Python script as attachment. BTW, the "coprocessorinitializewithpython" method is called by subset of processors that are supposed to do co-processing. I think that the usage of vtkCPPythonScriptPipeline is correct in this case. It is weird but it

[Paraview] Surface LIC contrast enhancement invalid range

A colleague of mine is having an issue using Surface LIC in ParaView 4.4: I am having issues while running a Python script in batch mode on a server with software rendering. While rendering a surface LIC image I receive the following error message: ERROR: In

Re: [Paraview] vtkHashSource-pv5.1 binary disappearing during ParaView 'make install'

Sorry, no luck producing on Ubuntu 16.04 with CMake 3.5.1. On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 11:32 AM, Utkarsh Ayachit wrote: > That's odd. Trying to see if I can reproduce this with your command > line. I'll report back once the build is done. > > On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 4:22

Re: [Paraview] Hover Point bug with multiblock dataset

Hello Indeed, there is a bug here. I will report it on the bug tracker asap. Thanks for reporting. Regards, On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 8:00 PM, Bob Flandard wrote: > Hello, > > Please see attached state file that demonstrates possible bug when using > Hover Points to query

Re: [Paraview] vtkHashSource-pv5.1 binary disappearing during ParaView 'make install'

That's odd. Trying to see if I can reproduce this with your command line. I'll report back once the build is done. On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 4:22 PM, Christopher Neal wrote: > Hi All, > > > > I’m seeing something strange when I try to compile ParaView 5.1 from the > source.

Re: [Paraview] Save Animation Bug (possibly)

Clayton, I could not reproduce this. What was the size of the images you're saving? I wonder if that matters. Utkarsh On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 12:13 AM, Clayton C wrote: > I will try to make this short: > > -Running Paraview 5.1.0 on Windows > -Layout with vertically

Re: [Paraview] capability of ParaView, Catalyst in distributed computing environment ...

Can you share your Python script? Another thought is that your Python script was added to each process instead of the subset of processes that are supposed to do the calculation on it. For example, the Python script that is supposed to generate the image should only be added through a

Re: [Paraview] Depth rendering issues on ParaView Desktop 5.1.0

This looks like the front faces of the surface have been culled. In the properties tab, enable advanced properties (the gear button) and locate the "Backface representation" setting. It's usually set to "Follow Frontface", but "Cull Frontface" will give results like you're seeing. Does changing

[Paraview] ParaView Visualization Workshop in Hamburg, Germany ...

Dear ParaView Users, in September DKRZ, the German Climate Computing Centre, hosts a visualization workshop for ParaView dedicated to the visualization and analysis of climate simulation data. If you're interested and a DKRZ user, please register, if you're not a DKRZ user and are still

Re: [Paraview] capability of ParaView, Catalyst in distributed computing environment ...

Hi, After getting help from the list, i finished the initial implementation of the code but in this case i have a strange experience with Catalyst. The prototype code is working with allinputsgridwriter.py script and could write multi-piece dataset in VTK format without any problem. In this