Hi David,
Thank you for your attention. All your comments were really helpful and we
definitely narrowed the location of the bug further. Given that 5.x.x works
well in your Arch Linux, we are for sure talking about driver-related
issues. I don't know to what extent these drivers are being used,
On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 9:55 PM, Júlio Hoffimann
wrote:
> According to the Arch Linux documentation
> (https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/xorg#Driver_installation), the Intel
> driver has priority over the others, is it being picked up in the log?
I'm afraid this is
Hi David,
On my laptop, the command pkgfile doesn't find any repo for the drivers
i965_dri.so and swrast_dri.so.
*This is what I have installed from the list of open-source drivers:*
extra/xf86-video-fbdev 0.4.4-5 (xorg-drivers xorg) [installed]
X.org framebuffer video driver
Hi Julio,
On Sun, Aug 7, 2016 at 2:01 PM, Júlio Hoffimann
wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> I downloaded all 4.x.x releases and everything works as expected. I
> downloaded ParaView 5.0.1 and ParaView 5.1.2, both give me the following
> error message about the driver:
>
> libGL
Hi David,
I downloaded all 4.x.x releases and everything works as expected. I
downloaded ParaView 5.0.1 and ParaView 5.1.2, both give me the following
error message about the driver:
libGL error: unable to load driver: i965_dri.so
libGL error: driver pointer missing
libGL error: failed to load
Thank you David, soon I have access to my workstation I'll try the other
versions and report the results here.
-Júlio
___
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Please
The only other thing I can think of is that it might be an issue with
the new depth peeling code, which is used to blend layers of
translucent geometry. However, from the look of the screenshots, it
appears that all of the geometry is opaque, in which case depth
peeling wouldn't be used.
Still,
Thank you David, I tried with Mesa and the result is the same. I'm gonna
try the newer release, but I suspect it won't solve the issue.
Any information that I can export and that can help figure out the root of
the problem?
-Júlio
___
Powered by
That is very odd. I use arch linux as well and don't see this here.
I'm suspecting a graphics driver issue at this point. Try running paraview
with the "--mesa-llvm" command line argument and see if it fares better.
That will force paraview to use a software-based OpenGL implementation and
bypass
This looks like the front faces of the surface have been culled. In the
properties tab, enable advanced properties (the gear button) and locate the
"Backface representation" setting. It's usually set to "Follow Frontface",
but "Cull Frontface" will give results like you're seeing.
Does changing
10 matches
Mail list logo