That is the standard behavior for a LX with bad batteries.
At 09:53 PM 9/21/03 +0200, you wrote:
Hi, Sid.
Could be depleted batteries.
The mirror movement is mechanical, as are the shutterspeeds from 1/2000 to
1/90.
In auto, however, the shutter is electronically controlled.
I remember the
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=1774996size=lg
Geez, you know, Marnie, I like that much much better! You're right, it
brings John (the
guy with the scowl - I was actually a participant, and brought my Spottie
along g) away
from the centre, which looks better, and it brings the
on 24.09.03 3:26, Amita Guha at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nate's 300D arrived today. So far I really like it. The ergonomics seem
fine to me. Yeah, it's a little plasticky, but that's ok. I'll have a
better idea of its capabilities once I get it outside, hopefully this
weekend. Let me know if
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=1774996size=lg
Geez, you know, Marnie, I like that much much better! You're right, it
brings John (the
guy with the scowl - I was actually a participant, and brought my Spottie
along g) away
from the centre, which
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
snip
Stone
by Dag Thrane
Oh my! Talk about capturing the moment! You caught the millisecond!
Thanks, it took some stones... :-)
snip
DagT
http://www.ebay.com/newsletter/Photo_information.html#dmiss1
Purely for your edification.
Peter
Dag T [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gianfranco Irlanda, Spaghetti Cat
I hate that straw above the cat, but nice shot.
Hi Dag,
Now that you point me that out, I figured that I didn't really
notice it before... and I hate that too, now.
:-(
I guess I should watch better my own pictures. Think that I
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Spaghetti Cat
by Gianfranco Irlanda
It's an interesting scene. I find the cat gets a bit lost in
the background
pattern. Wonder if a colour version would have solved that?
Well, maybe... At that moment I had with me the Z-1p too, loaded
with velvia (I almost
I'll be more interested in everybody's (and hopefully my) impressions after
living with their new camera for 6 months.
- Original Message -
From: tom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2003 11:16 PM
Subject: RE: 300D first impressions
-Original
Hi Thomas,
I haven't noticed the multisegment reading to adjust with the focus
distance. As for the flash, perhaps the P-TTL mode may consider the
distance but it's not likely for the older plain TTL flash mode. For
instance, the displayed range by the flash unit does not change with
on 24.09.03 12:45, Alin Flaider at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I haven't noticed the multisegment reading to adjust with the focus
distance. As for the flash, perhaps the P-TTL mode may consider the
distance but it's not likely for the older plain TTL flash mode. For
instance, the displayed
The photographer I work with (who skipped the AF generation of cameras) now
goes around at events with his 10D and a dumb grin, mumbling, This is too
easy.
BR
From: tom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Pretty much everyone loves their first DLSR. It's not that much of a
reflection of how good it is,
Fra: Gianfranco Irlanda [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dag T [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gianfranco Irlanda, Spaghetti Cat
I hate that straw above the cat, but nice shot.
Hi Dag,
Now that you point me that out, I figured that I didn't really
notice it before... and I hate that too, now.
:-(
Dag, you did a great job commenting on all the September submissions.
Thanks for your efforts.
As to your comments on my entry, you are right on the mark, IMHO. The
composition is not strong: it was my first attempt to use the macro
capabilities of my Optio S, and in the bright sunlight, it was
I don't have it in front of me, but the brochure for the Pentax PZ-1
(the first Pentax camera with multisegment metering) describes the
different situations the multisegment metering can adjust for.
A couple of them, like strong backlighting and sidelighting, are
compensated more, I believe,
Interesting. I see that Sonly made it into the top brands. Must be an
up-and-coming company... :)
chris
On Wed, 24 Sep 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.ebay.com/newsletter/Photo_information.html#dmiss1
Purely for your edification.
Peter
Had a play with a *istD in a local camera store today. I'd have to say I
was impressed.
I took along my CF card to grab some shots, and took a few RAW files to have
a peek at. For anyone who is interested in technical details, these are in
fact TIFF files with a .PEF extension.
Most TIFF
I've not done much portrait work, and I have a question about portrait
lenses.
Is the 'desirable' focal length of ~85mm to get a slightly flattened
perspective, in order to de-emphasise features on peoples faces etc? Or is
it to allow a good photographer to subject distance? Or both?
Just
on 24.09.03 15:24, Peter Loveday at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just curious about the ideal portrait lens on a *istD. Obviously the FOV
crop factor of 1.5 means that a 50mm lens has the same field of view as a
75mm lens, but, still being 50mm focal length has the same perspective on
any
OK, a glass of wine, 3 kids in bed, nothing better to do (well,
actually). Time to get unpopular:
David J Brooks, Blackwater River
Almost looks like a cold winter with frost from the morning fog still
on the trees, nice IR effect. I miss something in the composition,
some point
Can I hijack? I have taken about 5 pictures in my entire life but can
I?
On Tue, 23 Sep 2003, Dag T wrote:
Thomas Moraitis, Sunset with Drying octopusses
Sunsets are popularIt is not a bad one, but in this case I miss
something in the other end of the line. The composition is too
Well, they're really guidelines more than anything, but I don't mind
writing something a little clearer for a webpage. I don't have one of my
own, but if someone wants to host it, let me know.
chris
On Tue, 23 Sep 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Chris,
Could you put your critique
I like to hear both pro and con of the pictures i send in.This helps me in deciding if
i
need to change a
framing or lightinng for that particular style of subject matter,or keep things the way
they are for the
time being.I have pretty thick skin.although Shel came close to breaking it on
On 24/9/03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
I'll be more interested in everybody's (and hopefully my) impressions after
living with their new camera for 6 months.
Nearly one year on here with a D60 and my God It's still working!!!
Yup - right out of the box!!! I thought it would instantly stop
On 24/9/03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
Had a play with a *istD in a local camera store today. I'd have to say I
was impressed.
I took along my CF card to grab some shots, and took a few RAW files to have
a peek at. For anyone who is interested in technical details, these are in
fact TIFF
The real question for me on the balloon ride shot was to what degree to
make the balloon a silhouette, and you and W. Robb have both commented
on that aspect of the picture. Ideally, I wanted most of the balloon to
be a silhouette but some of the faces to be visible by the light of
flame.
All perspective is set by the camera to subject distance. Period.
Irrespective of the image format. If perspective is the driving factor
(natural noses, ears, etc. or a specific exaggeration), then the length of
the lens is selected for framing - to get the most out of the small 35mm or
digital
your self destruct mechanism is obviously as faulty as the AF then! ;-)
-Original Message-
From: Cotty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 24 September 2003 15:35
To: pentax list
Subject: Re: 300D first impressions
On 24/9/03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
I'll be more interested
Glad you found review all right, when I saw Dag's I kicked myself.
Why? Your suggestion was good.
Now why I can give responses/critiques/whatever in one or two lines? LOL.
Too
wordy by half.
:-) I had to, I was determined to comment them all, but some of the photos
would have deserved more
Nearly one year on here with a D60 and my God It's still working!!!
Yup - right out of the box!!! I thought it would instantly stop at 6
months + one day, for it would be entirely obsolete. But no, I can - do -
still shoot with it. Unbelievable.
Cheers,
Cotty
Well, of course it isn't set
Hi,
Does anybody have the above combination? I just bought the AF201SA
(thanks Eric) and I expected it to set the aperture and speed
automatically in the P mode; I tried it in near-darkness and, while
the flash worked, the mirror stayed open for a second, so... I don't
have a manual for the P30
er but did it take a nice shot?
But of course - yet another wonderful photo of the inside of a camera store.
It's amazing how many of those seem to accumulate over the years. :)
Love, Light and Peace,
- Peter Loveday
Director of Development, eyeon Software
Hi there, I'm new in the list.
My name is André, I'm brazilian and I own a MZ-M (ZX-M) and a K1000 (that I
use most of the time). Besides it's weight I worship that camera.
I hope I can learn a lot here.
P.S.: Sorry about my english, sometimes I think it sounds terrible.
André
Hallo
on
http://www.pentax.de/pentaxeurope/pentaxeurope_prod/pentaxeurope/v2/de/photo
/pricelist.html
is a new Pentax Preislist (starting from 15.9.2003)
In the list is a footnote that the FA*2.8/80-200 will not be available for
long anymore.
This is the same with the FA 35-80, which has already
Interesting. I see that Sonly made it into the top brands. Must be an
up-and-coming company... :)
Aah yes, that would be the search under ' it sonly a Praktica but golly does
it take nice pictures - the last time I used it
Peter
Quoth Marnie aka Doe
Although it is easier to say that one likes something, than
to say *why* one isn't wild about something.
More socially correct, too :-)
My photography professor had a firm rule for class critiques. You HAD to start
with a positive comment. Having made the positive
På onsdag, 24. september 2003, kl. 17:29, [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Glad you found review all right, when I saw Dag's I kicked myself.
Why? Your suggestion was good.
Now why I can give responses/critiques/whatever in one or two lines?
LOL.
Too
wordy by half.
:-) I had to, I was determined to comment
Stolen Fuji Digital apparently all from local burglaries although the police
report also notes that the majority of these things are not yet available in
the UK.and stranger still all boxed in perfect condition. How odd.
F401 # 2HL06032
# 23L04336
#23L04360
F402
#24L09689
#24L09684
F410s
Rüdiger wrote:
RN Will there be a replacement of the 2.8/80-200 ???
FAJ* 80-200/2.8 ? :oT
Servus, Alin
Hi, and welcome to the list. Don't worry about your English. It sounds
fine to me, and as long we can understand what you're saying it doesn't
matter how you say it.
The K1000 is a great simple camera, though I have to admit that I *like*
its heaviness. Feels more sturdy to me.
chris
On
På onsdag, 24. september 2003, kl. 18:25, skrev [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Quoth Marnie aka Doe
Although it is easier to say that one likes something, than
to say *why* one isn't wild about something.
More socially correct, too :-)
My photography professor had a firm rule for class critiques. You HAD
Actually, f-stop varies with focal length at all aperture settings. So
you only know the approximate f-stop at intermediate focal lengths.
These lenses are pretty worthless with manual exposure, and manual, or
on-the-strob-sensor flash. If you are using slide film. The varience is
only 1 stop
on 24.09.03 18:35, Alin Flaider at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FAJ* 80-200/2.8 ? :oT
Or worse DA 80-200/2.8 - suitable only for APS DSLR...
--
Best Regards
Sylwek
This makes a 80-200mm IS (or whatever) more plausable? Wishful thinking, i
know.
/Paul
From: Rüdiger Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Discontinue of the FA* 2.8/80-200
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2003 18:22:19 +0200
Hallo
on
In programmed AE mode the camera will be set to 1/100 and the aperture will
also be set according to where you have the switch - Red, Green or Yellow .
But this information applies to the AF200SA since the 201 was probably not
yet on the market at the time the P30 manual was written.
Don
Pentax.co.uk is back up.
Pentax officially launched its highly anticipated *ist D digital SLR at
Sandown races on the 29th August 2003. A number of the UK's leading
photographic editors attended the launch and put the *ist D through its
paces (although time was also taken by many to have a
I wonder if Pentax is big enough to absorb the inevitable losses that a price
war would necessitate? They need market share with the *ist D, and they need
it
now.
I'd be worried.
cheers,
frank
Yeah, but we're talking digicams here, not DSLRs, right? Although that
probably affects the market
Thanks for your comments.
I agree it would have been better if centered more. This flower was, however, four
inches off the ground in the middle of a patch of prickly pear cactus. I did get
some shots that were composed better, but did not as clearly portray the detail I
was looking for, such as
Hi!
Welcome. Your English is just fine, at least from my (Israeli born in
Russia) point of view. You're bound to have much fun with these
fellows.
Boris
On Wed, 24 Sep 2003 13:13:44 -0700
Andre Albano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi there, I'm new in the list.
My name is André, I'm brazilian
Hey, is anyone else going to Photo Plus Expo October 30-Nov. 1?
http://www.photoplusexpo.com/
Free code, for the exhibitor's floor, good until October 3: EDK10A0
Also, the Ansel Adams exhibit at MOMA ends on November 3...
Amita
Sigma - especially the 4-5.6/70-300 DL macro is quite good, the APO is only slightly
better and more expensive.
All the best!
Raimo
Personal photography homepage at http://www.uusikaupunki.fi/~raikorho
-Alkuperäinen viesti-
Lähettäjä: Herb Chong [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Vastaanottaja: [EMAIL
i plan to be there, but can only make Saturday.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: Amita Guha [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 1:18 PM
Subject: New York photo stuff
Hey, is anyone else going to Photo Plus Expo October 30-Nov. 1?
On Wed, 2003-09-24 at 09:49, Sylwester Pietrzyk wrote:
on 24.09.03 18:35, Alin Flaider at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FAJ* 80-200/2.8 ? :oT
Or worse DA 80-200/2.8 - suitable only for APS DSLR...
--
Best Regards
Sylwek
Or even Worse:
FAJ* 80-200/2.8 IS DA
To really spite those of
On 24/9/03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
your self destruct mechanism is obviously as faulty as the AF then! ;-)
Personally I have never had a problem with the AF - maybe I'm doing
something wrong? AFAIK, the AF is working fine. I only us it shooting
sporty things which is not often. I use
On 24/9/03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
Hi there, I'm new in the list.
My name is André, I'm brazilian and I own a MZ-M (ZX-M) and a K1000 (that I
use most of the time). Besides it's weight I worship that camera.
I hope I can learn a lot here.
Hi André,
Welcome to the list.
P.S.: Sorry
Kostas,
I had a period of noting down technical details of every shot I took.
I stopped doing that later, but it was (and in periods still is) a very
useful exercise.
A small notebook and a pencil is robust, convenient battery-independent, and
does not erase it's memory even if it gets wet. :-)
DOF is dependent on the set aperture and focal length of the lens only. This
is why a 50mm lens has the same DOF, for a given f-stop, on a film or partial
frame DSLR.
BR
From: Sylwester Pietrzyk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
FOV at the same magnification scale should be equal with 35mm and *istD when
Take notes on whatever you find most convenient, there's no definite
standard.
To subsequently free yourself from the note-taking, look for patterns in the
way you do different subjects. Judging from my own experience, I'd say that
for similar subjects, you will find that you will tend to use the
Now the the *istD is making its way through the sales process, those of
us with K and M lenses are going to have to make a choice: use a light
meter or modify the mount. Given that many of us, including myself,
will probably opt for the former, what light meter would be nice to have
in a kit and
RE: Favorite light meter?
First favorive : My brain.
Second favorite : Gossen Multi-Pro digital
Third favorite : Pentax Digital Spot
Fourth favorite : SL clip-on analog
Fifth favorite : Polaroids on my 4X5
LEAST FAVORITE : exposed and developed conventional film
That about does it
JCO
I'd be willing to bet money that Pentax leaves off the aperture ring on
the new f2.8 tele zoom. The AF cameras that people would use this lens on
either have crippled mounts or can set the aperture via the body, so why
encourage people to use old bodies when they could spend money upgrading
to
How do you account for the fact that ps digital cameras can still blur
the background for some portrait shots? With focal lengths around 7-12mm
or so, pretty much everything should be in focus, shouldn't it?
chris
On Wed, 24 Sep 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
DOF is dependent on the set
Cosina/Voigtlander makes a tiny averaging meter that will fit in the
accessory shoe of a camera. It's about an inch and a half square and an
inch tall. I use one with my screwmount Leica, and it's quite good.
Paul
Robert Gonzalez wrote:
Now the the *istD is making its way through the sales
high depth of field is not infinite depth of field. no, it shouldn'd all be
in focus.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: Chris Brogden [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 4:10 PM
Subject: Re: Portrait Lens Question
How do you account for the
På onsdag, 24. september 2003, kl. 15:42, skrev Kostas Kavoussanakis:
Can I hijack? I have taken about 5 pictures in my entire life but can
I?
Why not?
On Tue, 23 Sep 2003, Dag T wrote:
Thomas Moraitis, Sunset with Drying octopusses
Sunsets are popularIt is not a bad one, but in this
Anyone else getting duplicate messages, delayed messages -- i.e. repeated
messages? Weird never had the list do this to me before.
Marnie aka Doe
- Original Message -
From: Chris Brogden
Subject: Re: Portrait Lens Question
How do you account for the fact that ps digital cameras can still blur
the background for some portrait shots? With focal lengths around 7-12mm
or so, pretty much everything should be in focus,
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 2:42 PM
Subject: OT: Duplicate messages?
Anyone else getting duplicate messages, delayed messages -- i.e. repeated
messages? Weird never had the list do this to me before.
Happens
How do you account for the fact that ps digital cameras can still blur
the background for some portrait shots? With focal lengths around
7-12mm
or so, pretty much everything should be in focus, shouldn't it?
Depth of field is not focal length dependent.
William Robb
Isn't it a
I'm sure they are not selling that well at the price they are
listed... (in Italy 2500 euro, something like $2800...)
I too am hoping for a replacement, if they can make it lighter
and less expensive, and, better for me, for a FA* 70-200/4.
I saw that also the FA 85/2.8 Soft, the A 15/3.5 and the
From: Chris Brogden
Subject: Re: Portrait Lens Question
How do you account for the fact that ps digital cameras can still blur
the background for some portrait shots? With focal lengths around 7-12mm
or so, pretty much everything should be in focus, shouldn't it?
Depth of field is not
My E-10 has a 9-36 zoom, which for this sensor acts like a (roughly)
38-150 zoom in 35 mm. So at 9, it has the same perspective as a 38 and
so on, at least as far as I can tell.
Modern:
Sekonic L308B-II
Takes one common battery.
Does flash as well.
Everything but a spot.
Can be had used for way $100.
Classic:
Brockway-labelled old Sekonic.
Commonly $25.
Really nice reflected/incident.
--
--
Collin Brendemuehl
KC8TKA
Ron Santo deserves enshrinement in Cooperstown.
PS cameras and lenses can blur anything.
How do you account for the fact that ps digital cameras can still blur
the background for some portrait shots? With focal lengths around 7-12mm
or so, pretty much everything should be in focus, shouldn't it?
--
--
Collin Brendemuehl
KC8TKA
There has been some interest in the 20/21mm SLR
lenses here lately so I took posted a few shots using the
MAMIYA/SEKOR-SX 21mm F4 (M42) lens on this page:
http://www.jcoconnell.com/temp/ms21mm/ms21mm.htm
Later,
JCO
For anyone planning on being in the Detroit, Michigan (USA) area in the next
few months, the Detroit Zoo is once again hosting a travelling exhibit of
the BG Wildlife Photographer of the Year. This is the contest put on by BBC
Wildlife Magazine, displayed at the London Museum of Natural History,
Following the previous thread on this subject, I put the question to my 17
month old son upon the completion of his latest masterpiece.
Here's him pondering the question.
http://wwwstaff.murdoch.edu.au/~sking/pages/art.htm
Maybe it would be art if he was weeing in his nappy...
Simon
PS No
no, it's Bob. 8-)
Herb
- Original Message -
From: Simon King [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 6:00 PM
Subject: Is it Art?
Following the previous thread on this subject, I put the question to my 17
month old son upon the completion of his
Welcome aboard, Andre,
Your English is way better than my Portuguese! (That's because I don't speak
Portuguese at all) :-)
Besides, some of the worst English written here is from our members in
England. Try reading some of Cotty's posts some time... g
You'll have fun, and learn a lot too.
I plan on going, Probably on Thursday with a photographer buddy. Will post
when things are confirmed. Possibly a NYCPDML meeting? Lunch?
Butch
Each man had only one genuine vocation - to find the way to himself.
Hermann Hesse (Demian)
Hi, Kostas,
Thanks for taking the time to comment on my photograph. Yup, I was at the
demo, as a participant. That was back in my days as a radical. Then I
realized that there will be no revolution, and if there is one, it will
inevitably fail. But here I am, going off on a tangent.
As I
A favorite pro Outdoor Photographer friend of mine takes photo critiquing
very seriously and will almost always say something positive about an image
no matter what. He then goes on and comments on the hows and whys of an
aspect of the image that could improve the image.
He never has said he
http://cgi.ebay.ca/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=2952229482category=30075rd=1
After months of sniped frustration,i got something i wanted.Now i can get a bit closer
to
the fall colours
when i head up north for our ThanksGiving
As I understand it, Simon,
There's nothing to ponder. As the creator of the piece, your son need only
pronounce it to be art for it to be so. As a consequence of that
pronouncement, he will become an artist. It's that simple!
As far as the weeing in his nappy part, well, that won't affect the
Thanks Bill.
Also for anyone in the area, a local art center (Meadowbrook Art Center,
Novi, Michigan) has a small exhibition of Monte Nagler's work. Monte is one
of the better B+W photographer in the area if not the country. I believe it
runs through October 11th.
Kenneth Waller
- Original
LOL. Great shot. Looks exactly like one of those artistes standing
next to their work at a show.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 09/24/03 06:00PM
Following the previous thread on this subject, I put the question to my
17
month old son upon the completion of his latest masterpiece.
Here's him pondering the
Hi,
Saw one of these for sale at a reduced price at a local camera shop.
They were selling it for about $127 Cdn, which the Bank of Canada Quick
Currency Convertor tells me is $93.78 US.
Is that anywhere near a decent price (considering this is a reputable
shop, so I'll get a warranty and all)?
On 24/9/03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
So why the hell can I only find a hands on in an obscure digital
photography mag, but no mention anywhere of this day?
AP are reviewing this week and will publish this coming Saturday. I'll
precis when it arrives.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) |
On 24/9/03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
Now the the *istD is making its way through the sales process, those of
us with K and M lenses are going to have to make a choice: use a light
meter or modify the mount.
Surely an option exists to modify the camera? Seriously!
Cheers,
Cotty
On 24/9/03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
That being said, I find it inexplicably stupid for Pentax to remove the
aperture ring at this point in time. They're turning their great AF
lenses into crippled tools designed for people who can't be bothered to
use an aperture ring.
Out of context by
- Original Message -
From: frank theriault
Subject: M 1.4 50mm question
Hi,
Saw one of these for sale at a reduced price at a local camera shop.
They were selling it for about $127 Cdn, which the Bank of Canada Quick
Currency Convertor tells me is $93.78 US.
Is that anywhere
Thanks Bill, and everyone else who answered/commented on my post.
The concensus seems that it's a nice lens, but the price is a bit steepish.
I'll see if I can get them down a bit. If they won't, I know they're not a
rare lens, so I can wait.
thanks again,
frank
William Robb wrote:
I think
Hi Frank,
I think it's a very good lens. I have two of them and as far as I can tell,
they perform identical to each other. Both a bit worse wide open than
either the K50/1.4 or FA50/1.4 that I also own, but I prefer the bokeh of
the M50/1.4 and I think that it is quite sharp for impromptu
why not put it in manual and set shutter speed
approx what you think you will need.
Then fire test shots adjusting fstop until image
looks right on LCD?
JCO
J.C. O'Connell mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Indeed. We in Toronto know what the West thinks of us, and we really
don't care. In fact, we don't really care what the West thinks about
anything. But you guys already know that, don't you? vbg
Soon I'll be in Nova Scotia, and I'll get to go back to hating Toronto,
just like I did when I
Hey, I remember that shot, W in U! She's a real cutie, and that's one terrific
photo of her.
Funny (and I don't mean this as a criticism of your post), but I'm always amused
when I hear, I rarely use the lens wider than [insert an aperture here]. Why
buy a fast lens if you aren't going to use
hi.
thanks for commenting on my sept pug photograph.
(thanks for another thing - I had to check up on the word 'triptych')
:-)
Sridhar
G. Sridar, Terrace
Great idea, I like the lines and the repetitions in the windows, as
well as the picture in the middle. This is a natural triptych.
The big problem is finding a reputable site to look this up. Internet
searches bring up so many conflicting answers, even from the so-called
authoritative sites, that optical physics seems based more on opinion and
limited experience than optical laws. So I wasn't questioning the
validity of
Woo hoo indeed. Nice lens for a good price. Now all you need is a 45mm
and you're set to go. :)
chris
On Wed, 24 Sep 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://cgi.ebay.ca/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=2952229482category=30075rd=1
After months of sniped frustration,i got something i
Ease of focusing for one. Fast lens = brighter viewfinder. Not to
mention the coolness factor. I probably won't shoot my K50/1.2 at 1.2
*that* often, but focusing is super easy and I get to carry around a big
honkin' piece of glass. Please, no jokes about compensating... :)
chris
(P.S.
1 - 100 of 119 matches
Mail list logo
