Hi,
I just put up my Vivitar 100mm f:3.5 auto-focus macro lens for sale on
Ebay. Here's the link if you are interested.
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=2953740831
Gary J Sibio
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://home.earthlink.net/~garysibio/
You know you're having a bad day when
on 25.09.03 1:01, Bill Owens at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The latest issue arrived yesterday with a very thorough review of the film
*ist. According to them, it's a very nice camera for the money. Biggest
gripe was no flash confirmation.
Maybe there was no flash confirmation with built-in
Bill wrote:
BO The latest issue arrived yesterday with a very thorough review of the film
BO *ist. According to them, it's a very nice camera for the money.
The key word is indeed for the money.
To quote a friend: I peeked at the corners of the viewfinder and
there it was a jumbel of
Pentax published:
Its simple, functional design, coupled with the elimination of an
aperture ring, considerably improves the camera's operability.
Rob wrote:
RB So the elimination of the aperture lens actually improves operation?
Yeah, along this line we can expect the next step to be the
Hello,
b_rubenstein wrote:
DOF is dependent on the set aperture and focal length of the
lens only. This
is why a 50mm lens has the same DOF, for a given f-stop, on a
film or partial frame DSLR.
Not really...
DOF is only dependent on two things:
- actual aperture
- magnification ratio
Brendan wrote:
Doesn't it have flash confirmation? the lil flash
thing blinks alot to confirm it worked? right?
I don't know. To save batteries and have a more powerfull flash i've
never used the build in one. The external has got a flash conformation.
But let's take a look at the manual.
Fra: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: J. C. O'Connell
why not put it in manual and set shutter speed
approx what you think you will need.
Then fire test shots adjusting fstop until image
looks right on LCD?
So much for the concept of decisive
On 24/9/03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
PS: I really cannot understand why there's a bodycap for the
*Ist D listed on its own... is it any different from the usual K
mount one??
No aperture ring ;-)
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|
Really sorry to hear that, Mark. I have two of my own.
keith whaley
Mark Cassino wrote:
I'm bummed. A little before 3 this morning, I heard my cat cough and then
this 'thud'. Flipping on the lights, I found her laying on the floor,
unconscious. She died a few minutes later. Just a few
Sorry to hear that, Mark. She was a beautiful cat, and I'm sure, a great
companion to you and your family.
regards,
frank
Mark Cassino wrote:
I'm bummed. A little before 3 this morning, I heard my cat cough and then
this 'thud'. Flipping on the lights, I found her laying on the floor,
Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
As Frits and maybe others (I'm on digest) have mentioned, NiCad's
respond well to this sort of treatment. It keeps them at best
performance vs use, and prevents the dreaded 'memory' effect.
I think you mean the nonexistent memory effect. :-) There is an
Hi!
I am studying my new F 85/2.8 soft, thanks to Bruce Dayton. Here is a
picture which I think I just spoiled -
http://www.usefilm.com/image/212782.html
Some of the people who saw it really liked it, but I don't quite like
it. I think that there is too much light leaked through the trees.
I
I would suggest that it works the same way; that the aperture and speed will
be set automatically in AE mode. But if you have the shutter set below 1/100
it will not be changed - apparently. The P30 film speed is ISO 100 without a
film in the camera. But why not just put one in? Or an empty
That, or the 55mm, and the AF400 flash and bracket, and i should be set for quite a
while.
Dave
Woo hoo indeed. Nice lens for a good price. Now all you need is a 45mm
and you're set to go. :)
chris
On Wed, 24 Sep 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Johan wrote:
JUW Hmmm, didn't know that. What is a good picture to check the lens quality ?
Personally I would prefer a medium tone, fine shade, high detail
image. Your iguana in diffuse light would do fine. I learned some
time ago that saturation and high contrast tend to mask the
Perspicacious, eh? Sweaty? grin.
No one's mentioned photography's magic dirty little
secret: What you choose to show is vital. What percentage
of your shots would you show on PUG, for example?
For me, right now, selecting shots to scan/keep is
the real magic. I mean, you should see some of
- Original Message -
From:
Subject: Re: Favorite light meter?
Which reminds me of Cartier-Bresson, the real expert on decisive
moments, and who didn't have a light meter at all :-)
He must of been using some of that really long range film. There is no way
that a picture can work if
Thanks Frank.
If the weather fairy is on my side THIS year,i should have a few rolls of E100VS ,and i
liked what i saw
in the Fuji NPS 160 for neg's, to show.Hopefully we can all get together prior to your
move in the near
future.Should be free the majority of Oct now that show season has ground
Factor in the usual shipping and I think the lens you're looking
at is in the ballpark. You can spend wait too much time waiting for
bargains.
frank theriault wrote:
Thanks Bill, and everyone else who answered/commented on my post.
The concensus seems that it's a nice lens, but the price is a
Brother Bruce.
I sure will.Your been patient with all my quiries,this is the least i can dog
I was actually after a 165 f2.8 but saw this and his BIN was $249 US,fiqured he wanted
around 200-
225,did some checking on KEH and Henrys and the bin prices was even cheaper.
The seller has been around
Over a 1.4, eh? That's a tough one. You don't really gain that much in
terms of lens speed, and the size and weight goes up. I upgraded from a
1.4 because I felt like I was just missing handholdable speeds in low
light.
I'm ok with just lending it to you, so you don't need to send me anything
Sorry to hear that, Mark. I'm glad you have photos to remember her by.
chris
On Thu, 25 Sep 2003, Mark Cassino wrote:
I'm bummed. A little before 3 this morning, I heard my cat cough and then
this 'thud'. Flipping on the lights, I found her laying on the floor,
unconscious. She died a
Hi,
With all the enconia about the MX, and having seen one at a reasonable price
(around $100 for a mint-looking body), I put it on hold until the seller can
get a battery so that I can see how well the meter works. Thus far, it's
taking weeks for him to get the battery. Is the battery required
On 25 Sep 2003 at 19:18, Paul Ewins wrote:
Why? Which system do you think will retain aperture rings? Or is it the
DA lenses that worry you - as the Canon and Nikon equivalents probably
worry their users.
If I have to make the choice between systems without aperture rings (which it
looks
On 25 Sep 2003 at 9:36, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Which reminds me of Cartier-Bresson, the real expert on decisive moments, and
who didn't have a light meter at all :-)
Who by all accounts produced some pretty poor negs for the master printers he
employed.
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
on 25.09.03 12:54, Mark Cassino at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm bummed. A little before 3 this morning, I heard my cat cough and then
this 'thud'. Flipping on the lights, I found her laying on the floor,
unconscious. She died a few minutes later. Just a few hours before she was
running
They are about the most common you can get. It takes two 1,5 volt batteries.
Type S76 (silver oxide), but one CR-1/3N (3 volts) also does the job. Every
drugstore or fotoshop should have lots of them. So it's a little strange
that you must wait weeks! 5 minutes tops should be enough!
regards, Hans
The MX uses the very common 76-series battery (eg. S76, KS76, etc.) which
is used in most MF SLRs. Any camera store or Radio Shack should have them
in stock. Don't worry about availability.
chris
On Thu, 25 Sep 2003, Larry Levy wrote:
Hi,
With all the enconia about the MX, and having
On 23 Sep 2003 at 9:00, mike wilson wrote:
There are at least two forms of sticky mirror. There is the type
where it sticks to the bumper foam at the top of its stroke and the form
where it sticks to its rests at the bottom. Associated with the latter
is not focusing at
Sympathy from me and sad meows from Fuji and Dubbie.
Lewis
I'm bummed. A little before 3 this morning, I heard my cat cough and then
this 'thud'. Flipping on the lights, I found her laying on the floor,
unconscious. She died a few minutes later. Just a few hours before she was
running
Gary, I prefer to look for myself what I am interested to, than being
told to look at aunctions. In my book, this is close to spam.
Thanks,
Andre
i,
I just put up my Vivitar 100mm f:3.5 auto-focus macro lens for sale
on Ebay. Here's the link if you are interested.
Larry,
Could be. When I bought a used MX I had to replace the original battery
(1 piece) with two button batteries.
Unfortunately, I put them in with +/- reversed and burned out the meter.
taking weeks for him to get the battery. Is the battery required for the MX
difficult to get (and could
I saw a version of this exhibit in Kendal a couple of weeks ago and can
testify that it is definitely worth a visit.
There are some awesome shots there.
Peter
- Original Message -
From: Bill Sawyer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Mark Cassino [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Kenneth R.
My experience has been the same as Marks, on the few
times when I thought my mailed film was lost, it did
eventually appear. I don't mail process anymore but
over the years I've mail processed hundreds of rolls to
several processors and have never had one lost.
If your film is lost there's a good
On Thu, 25 Sep 2003, Dr E D F Williams wrote:
I would suggest that it works the same way; that the aperture and speed will
be set automatically in AE mode.
The P30 does not have AE, only P and Manual. In P (even without the
flash) the shutter setting is irrelevant; the camera does as it
Hello,
I think when I put in the batteries into my MX I put them in backwards
and killed the light meter.
Can anyone confirm this for me?
Thanks,
~jmb~
On Thu, 25 Sep 2003, Andre Langevin wrote:
Gary, I prefer to look for myself what I am interested to, than being
told to look at aunctions. In my book, this is close to spam.
Andre
I don't know how long you have been on this list, but for a while now
it's been considered quite acceptable
2 auctions of mine entering their last 24 hours shortly, last post on the
subject.
Tokina 28-70 f/2.8:
http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=2952021694
Leica CL:
http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=2952024579
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People,
On 25/9/03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
I'm bummed. A little before 3 this morning, I heard my cat cough and then
this 'thud'. Flipping on the lights, I found her laying on the floor,
unconscious. She died a few minutes later. Just a few hours before she was
running around playing like a
On 25/9/03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
I think you mean the nonexistent memory effect. :-) There is an
enormous amount of misinformation floating about concerning NiCd (and
NiMH) cells, but the low-down is this:
The memory effect has been demonstrated, but it's not easy to
achieve. You need
My condolences, Mark. It's always hard to lose a pet.
-Original Message-
From: Mark Cassino [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 6:54 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: R.I.P.
I'm bummed. A little before 3 this morning, I heard my cat
cough and then
Hi!
My co-worker is willing to sell me his MZ-5n camera. He bought it some
5 years ago, roughly one year after it was introduced. This one is
made in Japan. The only problem that this body seems to have is a
built-in flash spring. But I think I can live with this. Now he is
asking $250.
I
My MX, just like all of my other Pentaxen, has a 2L76 battery in it. Looks
like a pair of the button cells stacked on top of each other. $3.49 at the
local supermarket in the display of little batteries.
-Mat
They are about the most common you can get. It takes two 1,5 volt
batteries.
Type
you apparently weren't on the direct email list that Gary sent to a bunch of
people, myself included.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: Chris Stoddart [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 10:36 AM
Subject: Re: FS Vivitar 100mm/3.5 Macro on Ebay
On Thu, 25 Sep 2003, Herb Chong wrote:
you apparently weren't on the direct email list that Gary sent to a
bunch of people, myself included.
Herb
Ah... I wasn't :-) As you were then Andre!
Chris
Why not buy another ME Super in ugly condition from Ebay or wherever and use
it for parts?
I think $250 for a 5n with a problem is too high. I can't really remember
now but I think I got mine for that amount or less from an Australian PDML
member in great condition WITH a lens and shipping...
Really sad to hear this Mark. We here know how you feel,having lost 3 ourselves the
past
12 months.
Hope you have lots of pictures.They help.
Dave, Kelly, Liner, and Norman
I'm bummed. A little before 3 this morning, I
heard my cat cough and then
this
On Thu, 25 Sep 2003, Cotty wrote:
Leica CL:
http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=2952024579
hugely wistful sigh
But the missus wants a new sofa and the Beemer needs a new camshaft and
that's only this month.
/hugely wistful sigh
Chris
I really liked this photo when I first saw it on the PUG (I'm a cat
owner) and I will always think of that face with vigilant. It's hard
to lose animals. I lost 2 cats to FIP (one just wandered off and one
died in our room) and 2 to cars, so I understand how sad you are.
Steven Desjardins
putting them in backwards won't kill the meter.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: john bailey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 10:30 AM
Subject: MX battery misshap
I think when I put in the batteries into my MX I put them in backwards
and
i think after 5 years, it should be less unless prices are that much higher
in Israel. BH sold new for just over $300.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: PDML [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 10:54 AM
Subject: Question about MZ-5n
Mark,
Sorry to hear of your loss. They do become part of the family, don't they.
Butch, Panther, and Reboot (my 2 cats)
This is my experience with MZ-5n
I purchased my MZ-5n in 98. Recently its flash spring
broke.
Recently I found that its metering needs calibration.
Pentax asked $180 to fix this.
Thanks
Ramesh
--- Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
My co-worker is willing to sell me his MZ-5n
On Thu, 25 Sep 2003, Cotty wrote:
Leica CL:
http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=2952024579
hugely wistful sigh
But the missus wants a new sofa and the Beemer needs a new camshaft and
that's only this month.
/hugely wistful
Hi!
On Thu, 25 Sep 2003 11:12:33 -0400
Herb Chong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i think after 5 years, it should be less unless prices are that much
higher
in Israel. BH sold new for just over $300.
Herb
Normally prices in Israel are 1.5-2.0 times as much as prices in US of
A. This guy claims
I think I need to add, you want to use a tripod for these shots.
graywolf wrote:
Why a brick wall. The grid of bricks allows you to see barrel or
pincushion distortion very easily. You can see if all corners and the
center are in focus at the same time. The rough edges of the bricks show
how
a bunch of people got direct emails from you bypassing the mailing list.
however, you intended it, that is what happened.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: Gary Sibio [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 3:29 PM
Subject: Re: FS Vivitar 100mm/3.5
Boris wrote:
BL 1. What else can go wrong with MZ-5n after 5 years of moderate use?
Don't know really. In more than five years mine has seen some
climbing and skiing, went from -20 to almost 50 degrees, it even
held up to cave moisture and sea splashes and still has to let me
down. But I
There was a notice in the local post office last month saying that a
mail truck carrying express mail sent from that post office had been
involved in an accident and all the mail had been destroyed in the
resulting fire. So mail can certainly be permanently lost.
mike wilson wrote:
Hi,
Mark
Peter Loveday [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My only complaint is that the 12 bit data is padded to 16 bit. This makes
the raw file bigger than it needs to be; they are over 12MB, where they
should only need to be 9MB or so. This reduces storage on CF, and slows
write times, seemingly unnecesarily.
Takes two 357 batteries. You can get them at the watch department in
Wal-Marts for under $3 each.
Larry Levy wrote:
Hi,
With all the enconia about the MX, and having seen one at a reasonable price
(around $100 for a mint-looking body), I put it on hold until the seller can
get a battery so
I have only been getting doubles from certain people. So they are
probably subscribed twice. Anyone who is subscribed twice (or maybe
more) can fix it by unsubscribing over and over until the get a message
back that says they are not on the list. Then resubscribe once. If after
a short time
Putting them in backwards won't hurt the meter. It just won't work that
way, just take them out and put them in the other way around. They are
supposed to have the center terminal of the battery towards the battery
cover, that looks wrong at first glance.
The camera was designed to use two 357
-Original Message-
From: Mark Roberts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Peter Loveday [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My only complaint is that the 12 bit data is padded to 16
bit. This makes
the raw file bigger than it needs to be; they are over
12MB, where they
should only need to be 9MB or
Why not just buy a second ZX-L? I alway prefer to use two identical
bodies so that I do not have to think about how to use it when I change
between them. Problably just something left over from back when I have
to get it right or not get paid. Though to be honest back then one MX
was black and
On Thu, 25 Sep 2003, Herb Chong wrote:
a bunch of people got direct emails from you bypassing the mailing list.
however, you intended it, that is what happened.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: Gary Sibio [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 25,
tom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Mark Roberts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Peter Loveday [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My only complaint is that the 12 bit data is padded to 16
bit. This makes
the raw file bigger than it needs to be; they are over
12MB, where they
On Thu, 25 Sep 2003, Dr E D F Williams wrote:
'AE' mode with the P30 is attained by setting the lens to the 'A' position.
That's P mode, as you then have no control of the shutter either. In
the P30 you cannot put the shutter dial to the Program or Auto
position. Are you thinking of the P30t
Hi, Lon,
From a post of mine from last night, on another thread:
I'm gradually learning
that taking photographs is only a small part of this endeavor. Choosing what
to show is just as important.
Ha!!
Seriously, you're right. When one shoots a coupla rolls a week, the photos add up.
It's
Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
tom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
they're 6 megs. When converted to 8 bit tiff, they're 18 megs.
I thought a raw file was a sensor dump, and the size of the file
should correlate with the size of the sensor?
It should: 12 bits (1.5 bytes) per pixel for cameras
-Original Message-
From: graywolf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 3:38 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: M 1.4 50mm question
Can I ask a few questions? How do you know the history of your 30+ year
old lens?
At 03:42 PM 9/25/2003 -0400, you wrote:
a bunch of people got direct emails from you bypassing the mailing list.
however, you intended it, that is what happened.
It may not have shown that it was coming from the list because I put the
email addresses in the BCC field. However, I only mailed it to
I tried to respond to everyone off list, but I'd just like to publicly
thank all the folks who expressed condolences both on and off list. It
means a lot!
When I first found Pandora as a stray in the fall of 1988 the vet warned me
not to get too attached to her. He doubted that this four
If I recall, she had quite a history.. My cat is now 15 years old, and I'm
dreading when the time comes - most of us get so very attached to them. In
fact, she just hopped up on my desk as I was typing this...and
promptly knocked over the stack of unedited slides sitting here.
My guess
Hello,
is it possible that Pentax uses 16 bit because of the
new multi exposure feature?
To sum up the 12 bit data without loosing Information,
you need more then 12 bits.
If yes, it could be possible to reduce noise
with multi exposures on static subjects,
this is the same process which is used
On 26 Sep 2003 at 0:12, Martin Albrecht wrote:
Hello,
is it possible that Pentax uses 16 bit because of the
new multi exposure feature?
To sum up the 12 bit data without loosing Information,
you need more then 12 bits.
If yes, it could be possible to reduce noise
with multi exposures on
Does anyone know where I can maybe download an instruction manual for a
ZX-L? I just bought a used one from KEH in beautiful condition and I have no
clue how to set the Pentax functions. It's a neat little camera, although I
don't think I can bring myself to use the smiley face function - whatever
My only complaint is that the 12 bit data is padded to 16 bit. This makes
the raw file bigger than it needs to be; they are over 12MB, where they
should only need to be 9MB or so.
By my reading of it, the TIFF spec doesn't allow two 12-bit quantities
to be packed into three bytes. So it's
My guess would be that there's another Pandora out there, looking for a
chance to prove her mousing mettle...
Hundreds, unfortunately. I volunteer with a local adoption center, so
I get to see many wonderful cats in the course of a year. My experience
is in socialising semi-ferals; at
Hi Boris - love the idea, but I think there is too much softness. The
'blobs' of diffused light through the trees do dominate too much, IMO.
HTH
John Coyle
Brisbane, Australia
- Original Message -
From: Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: PDML [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday,
Mark, I'm truly sorry to hear of your loss. Our pets become members of our
family and they are missed when they depart. Be thankful it was quick.
I lost my Malamute Bear last year and I do miss him.
We're down to one cat at the moment but we anticipate the addition of a new
kitten soon.
Kenneth
Mark,
All I can do is to add my condolences to those expressed from
the other list members. We live with more than 20 cats here but
this doesn't ease the pain of a single loss. A couple of years
ago I found a kitten, a female, that lived with us only two
months. She got sick and almost suddenly
I have had 3 of this lenses. One was very sharp at all f-stops, one was
good wide open and excellent at all other stops, and one was absolutely
bad wide open and ok at the other stops. That means either that there
was quite a bit of difference lens to lens new, or that at least one of
the 3
I do not figure the dog M1.4 came from the factory that way. I do figure
the differences between #2 and #3 were sample to sample variation. On the
other hand many companies now seem to feel it is cheaper to use their
customers for the final quality control check.
No double, I am the authorized
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Treena) wrote:
Does anyone know where I can maybe download an instruction manual for a
ZX-L?
www.pentax.com, select USA, select Literature-download manuals, look for
it in the list.
---
John Dallman
With all the enconia about the MX, and having seen one at a reasonable
price
(around $100 for a mint-looking body), I put it on hold until the seller
can
get a battery so that I can see how well the meter works. Thus far, it's
taking weeks for him to get the battery. Is the battery required for
Could be. When I bought a used MX I had to replace the original battery (1
piece) with two button batteries.
Unfortunately, I put them in with +/- reversed and burned out the meter.
Really? I think I did that once too. :-)
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
I think when I put in the batteries into my MX I put them in backwards and
killed the light meter.
Can anyone confirm this for me?
I don't think it does, but I am not sure.
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
_
Tired of spam? Get
1. What else can go wrong with MZ-5n after 5 years of moderate use? This
camera never was CLA'ed, nor it was submitted to other procedures.
Dirty AF sensor maybe?
2. Is above a fair price?
Too expensive imo, and even for a perfectly fine MZ-5n.
Any other advise will be appreciated.
If the
Gary,
Posting your auction didn't bother me one bit.
Later,
Robert Woerner
- Original Message -
From: Gary Sibio [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 5:46 PM
Subject: Re: FS Vivitar 100mm/3.5 Macro on Ebay
At 03:42 PM 9/25/2003 -0400, you wrote:
At 01:17 PM 9/25/2003 -0700, you wrote:
It looked like a BCC to the list, hence bypassing any filters that were
based on the to/cc feilds, that probably why it looks like a direct
message to you. If you take a look at the Reply-To: feild, you will likely
see [EMAIL PROTECTED]
That's exactly what
Hi All,
It may seem like a silly question, but can the MZ-6/ZX-L do daylight fill
flash with its built in flash? If so, how?
I almost always use an external flash and so have only just thought of this
after owning the camera for over a year.
The instructions are, as usual, pretty useless.
Cheers,
92 matches
Mail list logo
