Re: PESO: One More Tree #4

Thanks, Ann! Dan Matyola *https://tinyurl.com/DJM-Pentax-Gallery * On Mon, May 1, 2023 at 5:39 PM ann sanfedele wrote: > it's interesting... I had a hard time finding photos with just one tree > in my digital files.. both on my website and on my

Re: PESO: One More Tree #4

it's interesting... I had a hard time finding photos with just one tree in my digital files.. both on my website and on my computer - I have one more where one tree stands out but there is another next to it so I discounted it .. besides, it had been on PUG before and seen elsewhere  taken at

PESO: One More Tree #4

This is the fourth in my series of images fitting the May PUG theme of "One Tree." Lee refers to this type of tree as an "Overcoat palm," because of the thick layer of dead fronds around its shoulders. It sits on the Pacific shoreline, just South of the beach across from the condo where we

Re: Peso - one more lonely tree not submitted for May PUG

Now THAT is an image that defines the PDML! Well composed, as well as full of cormorants. Dan Matyola *https://tinyurl.com/DJM-Pentax-Gallery * On Mon, May 1, 2023 at 9:01 AM ann sanfedele wrote: > Mike... they are all here - :-) > > >

Re: Peso - one more lonely tree not submitted for May PUG

That is a superb image, Ann! I like the blue tint, the loneliness of the tree, and the position of the sun. Dan Matyola *https://tinyurl.com/DJM-Pentax-Gallery * On Mon, May 1, 2023 at 8:08 AM ann sanfedele wrote: > Ok, I'll play > > Decided this one

Re: Slide scanners

> On May 1, 2023, at 9:54 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote: > > I scan a few slides and negatives from time to time using a copy-camera > approach now, with very good quality results. That's a doable prospect, > rather than doing hundreds to thousands of slides. > On May 1, 2023, at 10:54 AM, Bob

Re: Slide scanners

I’ve been using a Pentax Slide Holder 1X K with Pentax K extension tube #3, a reversing adapter, and a Pentax-M 50mm macro attached to a MFT* digital camera, lit by a Kaiser light table. It’s very quick and the results are good, at least for use as proofs. Nikon has a setup like it, based

Re: Slide scanners

Rick - I have and Epson V500 that can only scan 4 slides at once and scan at 4800 like Paul.. However, what I did for organization's sake is projected the photos in my carousels (which had already been pruned to some extent) put my camera on a tri pod and photographed the projected images..

Re: Slide scanners

;No offense taken. But I do like the results at 4800. And with a 35mm transparency of neg, that gives me an image large enough to print a 12 x18 with some adjustment. Here’s a full res scan of a 50 year old BW negative that I scanned for publication.

Re: Slide scanners

Have you thought about paying a scanning service. I can’t say I have experience, but I looked into it once. And I may use it yet, though I don’t have anywhere near your number of slides. I don’t know about quality or cost. I do know that they let you decide after scanning which slides you

Re: Slide scanners

Am 01.05.23 um 18:06 schrieb Paul Stenquist: Perhaps, but I don’t scan charts. I scan photos, and I like the results I get at 4800 when printed, not pixel peeking. Sorry. Won't happen again. Ralf -- Ralf R. Radermacher - Köln/Cologne, Germany Blog : http://the-real-fotoralf.blogspot.com

Re: Slide scanners

I follow the recommendations on this page, with 300 for scanning of color prints. https://www.scantips.com/basics08.html Henk Op ma 1 mei 2023 om 18:06 schreef Paul Stenquist : > Perhaps, but I don’t scan charts. I scan photos, and I like the results I > get at 4800 when printed, not pixel

Re: Slide scanners

Hi Rick, In the past, I was been engaged to do such projects from time to time, the last time about a decade or so ago. It's very tedious work and takes forever. Since then, I recommend they have the scanning done by ScanCafe.com, who are well set up to do it efficiently. Plus you don't have

Re: Slide scanners

Perhaps, but I don’t scan charts. I scan photos, and I like the results I get at 4800 when printed, not pixel peeking. > On May 1, 2023, at 11:55 AM, Ralf R Radermacher wrote: > > Am 01.05.23 um 17:42 schrieb Paul Stenquist: >> I scan slides on my Epson V850 Pro flatbed scanner. ... The epson

Re: Slide scanners

Am 01.05.23 um 17:42 schrieb Paul Stenquist: I scan slides on my Epson V850 Pro flatbed scanner. ... The epson will scan them at 4900 dpi native, generating very nice hi-kres files. You might as well scan at 2400 instead of 4800 and save a lot of time. From the test report by

Re: Peso - one more lonely tree not submitted for May PUG

Am 01.05.23 um 14:08 schrieb ann sanfedele: Ok, I'll play Decided this one  had been seen in a PUG before and the file, scanned from a Kodachrome slide, had not been well processed going to digital .  Have lovely memories associated with it though .

Re: Slide scanners

I scan slides on my Epson V850 Pro flatbed scanner. It has slide holders that position the slides correctly and hold about a dozen at a time. I find that automating slide scanning isn’t very efficient as exposures vary. I have the same storage as you: binders with slide holder pages. But i scan

Slide scanners

Good day, all, I have 20-odd binders of 35mm slides in slide pages, plus some carousels. It’s time to digitize these. So, I’m looking for a scanner that can automatically feed and scan a stack of slides. Any recommendations (or warnings)? Rick -- %(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List To

Re: Peso - one more lonely tree not submitted for May PUG

That's better - a tree's not a tree without a cormorant. > On 01/05/2023 14:01 ann sanfedele wrote: > > > Mike... they are all here - :-) > > https://annsan.smugmug.com/Works-in-Print/Calendars-in-Print/2010-Nature-Calendar/i-b8CXkWP/A > > > On 5/1/2023 8:33 AM, mike wilson wrote: > > Seems

Re: Peso - one more lonely tree not submitted for May PUG

Behind every tree hides a cormorant. > On 1 May 2023, at 13:33, mike wilson wrote: > > Seems to be missing a cormorant. As I suspect most of this month's entries > will be. > >> On 01/05/2023 13:08 ann sanfedele wrote: >> >> >> Ok, I'll play >> >> Decided this one had been seen in a

Re: Peso - one more lonely tree not submitted for May PUG

Mike... they are all here - :-) https://annsan.smugmug.com/Works-in-Print/Calendars-in-Print/2010-Nature-Calendar/i-b8CXkWP/A On 5/1/2023 8:33 AM, mike wilson wrote: Seems to be missing a cormorant. As I suspect most of this month's entries will be. On 01/05/2023 13:08 ann sanfedele

Re: Peso - one more lonely tree not submitted for May PUG

Seems to be missing a cormorant. As I suspect most of this month's entries will be. > On 01/05/2023 13:08 ann sanfedele wrote: > > > Ok, I'll play > > Decided this one  had been seen in a PUG before and the file, scanned > from a Kodachrome slide, had > not been well processed going to

Peso - one more lonely tree not submitted for May PUG

Ok, I'll play Decided this one  had been seen in a PUG before and the file, scanned from a Kodachrome slide, had not been well processed going to digital .  Have lovely memories associated with it though .

Re: Last call - May PUG

Nicely seen and executed, Larry. The patterns and textures in that bark are fascinating, Dan Matyola *https://tinyurl.com/DJM-Pentax-Gallery * On Mon, May 1, 2023 at 2:44 AM Larry Colen wrote: > I finally got around to submitting a pug, when the theme

Re: Last call - May PUG

I finally got around to submitting a pug, when the theme was mentioned I knew exactly what photo I needed to post, then when I was looking for it, I found another one. Of course when I went to process it to the requested size, the jpeg was at 516 KB, just barely too big for the size limit. It