Is there anything special about the USB cable that comes with the *istD?
I have bought a second cable from a third party source, to use with a
second computer, but the camera and the computer never recognize each
other. Do I have to get a Pentax brand cable?
This is the cable I bought:
On Mon, 7 Mar 2005, Scott Loveless wrote:
According to Pentax, the interface is USB 1.1. This is a standard and
shouldn't need a Pentax branded camera.
It's standard USB at the computer end, but I wasn't sure that it was
standard at the camera end as well. All those different B connectors...
On Wed, 23 Feb 2005, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Putting the files in alphabetical order seems to work pretty well ...
Sort by colour, is my suggestion.
anders
-
http://anders.hultman.nu/
med dagens bild och allt!
On Thu, 24 Feb 2005, Tom C wrote:
Recently I've noticed substantial (by that I mean someone as careless as
myself can notice and do a double take) color shifts when I save images as
.jpgs using the 'Save for Web' feature. I don't see the color shifts when I
create a .jpg using 'Save As'.
On Thu, 24 Feb 2005, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Putting the files in alphabetical order seems to work pretty well ...
Sort by colour, is my suggestion.
Color of what?
Sort by colour is my standard suggestion whenever people ask how they
should sort their record collection, their book shelf
On Tue, 22 Feb 2005, Mark Cassino wrote:
The only problem with the X's Drive is the battery - after a year's use my
X's Drive II can't hold a charge long enough to dump a 1 gig card. I
contacted the place where I bought the drive, who basically said they
recommended sending the drive in
On Mon, 21 Feb 2005, John Francis wrote:
Doesn't fit the symptoms.
1) She doesn't have a router
2) The cable modem is working just fine, as she can
get to the internet on her primary (desktop) machine.
Ok, but how is the laptop connected to the Internet then? Is it connected
at
Michael Heim:
Does anybody of you know a program (or some lines of DOS-Code) to change
file attributes of picture files (like the title or the author of a
picture)?
I often have lots of files with only the exif-information an need to set
some attibutes when giving the files to our image editor.
I'm considering bying a flash for my *istD. Which one is best of the 500
and the 360? It seems to me that both have functions that the other do
not. Which functions are more useful, and which functions are less
important?
Advantages of the AF 500 FTZ
* more powerful (higher GN)
* possible to
On Thu, 11 Nov 2004, Peter Loveday wrote:
As another note, every time I've had my *istD do something odd, (...)
Half the time, re-inserting the same batteries will fix it
Yesterday my *istD did a quite odd thing. It got stuck. The display
continued to show what it previuosly was showing,
On Thu, 11 Nov 2004, Haynes, Grady (PPC) wrote:
At the risk of starting a heated discussion (really really please that's
not what I want!!), it seems to me that most people on this list that
talk about going to the dark side use that phrase to mean switch to
Canon. Is there any particular
Bob W:
5) Don't disturb a dog at it's mealtime.
6) In Romania, carry a big stick.
There sure are some scary dogs roaming the streets of Bucarest. And
we didn't exactly got less scared of our guide's reassuring words
that only quite few of them has rabies...
anders
-
On Mon, 1 Nov 2004, Jim Apilado wrote:
2-Have you previously owned other digital cameras,either PS or DSLR
Yes, a little tiny Sony U30.
I have a Sony U60. You can operate this one with just one hand, unlike the
U30.
What? I operate my U30 with one hand most of the time, actually. It's
1-Why did you buy a Pentax *istD.
I had a long time wanted to have a digital SLR compatible with my old
lenses, but when the *istD came I hesitated. High cost and I wasn't
sure of the quality, this being Pentax' fist model and all. But when
I borrowed a Canon 10D to shoot some seals I realized
On Wed, 27 Oct 2004, Mark Roberts wrote:
A change from one shade to the next, say from level #240 to #241 is
very small in percent, but if you go from shade #1 to #2 it's a 100
percent increase.
Only if you're using a linear scale.
Yes, the exact values I quoted are based on a linear
On Wed, 27 Oct 2004, Tom C wrote:
A change from one shade to the next, say from level #240 to #241 is very
small in percent, but if you go from shade #1 to #2 it's a 100 percent
increase.
Is this true? That a 256-grade grayscale is non-linear? I thought a 100%
change would be going from
On Thu, 28 Oct 2004, Graywolf wrote:
Surely the moon is at infinity. I can not even begin to see how you
could have a focus problem. Autofocus problem yes, focus no.
Long lenses don't always are set to infinity at the end of the scale. If
getting the moon in focus only had required to turn the
Shel Belinkoff:
What are quantization effects?
The effect that comes from that you only have distinct levels to play
with, and that subtle changes have to be either on or off.
Assume 8 bit gray scale. That means 256 distinct shades of gray from
0 (full black) to 255 (full white).
A change from
On Wed, 27 Oct 2004, Mark Roberts wrote:
Absolutely clear skies and a great view of the moon from my bedroom
window!
ist-D, Sigma EX 300/2.8 and 2x teleconverter in operation here.
:-)
This is from Stockholm, Sweden:
http://anders.hultman.nu/dagens/041028-043855
*ist D, Vivitar 400/5.6
Leon Altoff:
My wife brought home a digital camera from her work the other day. A
Kodak DC-50. It uses PCMCIA cards (still work), doesn't even manage 1
megapixel and has no preview screen.
Oh, I had one of those at my work back then. Not a pleasurable
experience. a totally bizarre shutter lag
On Fri, 15 Oct 2004, Rob Studdert wrote:
when a disc is spinning at 52x (ie 52x500RPM on the outside edge)
52 x 200 rpm actually. 200 rpm is the slowest speed a standard audio CD
spins at (when reading the outermost track) and it is that speed that is
used when quoting modern day large speed
On Fri, 15 Oct 2004, John Francis wrote:
All the DSLRs I know retain the 3:2 aspect ratio of 35mm film,
as do many of the PS digitals. The only 4:3 aspect ratio
I've found has been on the low end, with the 640x480 cameras
All DSLRs Ive seen use 3:2 (Canon, Nikon, Pentax) but all other
On Wed, 13 Oct 2004, Mishka wrote:
Get an auto flash, and it will be as easy as TTL (esp. with
aperture-priority: you set the aperture on the flash and just shoot).
Well, almost. Used Vivitars and Sunpaks are pretty cheap.
I have a Sunpak flash from 1990. Is it possible to use it with the
On Thu, 14 Oct 2004, Chris Stoddart wrote:
If you are a pro you just charge for post-production work. If you spend
2 hours shooting a job, then 6 hours at the computer, and only charge
for 2 hours you are a fool and deserve to be paid poorly.
Of course that's what any pro will do, but
On Mon, 11 Oct 2004, John Francis wrote:
That suggests 2048-bit keys should be secure for maybe the next 20 years.
Adding two bits per year to the key length should more than keep up with
the increases in processor speed, if you're really being paranoid.
Still, this whole discussion is based
There have been a discussion on another list about what the f in the
aperture value means, like when one say f2.8 or such.
Different theories have been put forward. Anyone here who has an
authoritive answer?
anders
-
http://anders.hultman.nu/
med dagens bild och allt!
On Wed, 22 Sep 2004, Peter J. Alling wrote:
Could people please put Antonio's name in the subject if they respond to
him. I'd like my filter to catch it so I don't have to even see his
spew.
You won't be able to make people comply with that. I'll give you another
tip, though. Most mail
On Thu, 16 Sep 2004, Graywolf wrote:
reindeer meat? Humm...? Me thinks you have your tribal lore mixed.
Tribal lore? Over here you can buy reindeer meat at the supermarket.
anders
-
http://anders.hultman.nu/
med dagens bild och allt!
Ryan:
You'd be able to have so much fun with those sorta people!
You have to eat the reindeer if not they eat you, really. Their teeth are
much sharper in real life..
Another friend of mine used to tell those sorta people that she
attended not only the car wash but also the reindeer wash when she
On Thu, 16 Sep 2004, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Once the exposure has been set and the aperture chosen, is it
necessary to use the green button for subsequent exposures if they are
all going to be at the same aperture and exp value?
No.
A press on the green button does a light metering that takes
On Mon, 13 Sep 2004, frank theriault wrote:
I have never captured the flash of another camera before. This was
an istD DA16-45 at 40mm 1/45 at f4 existing light.
http://www.cmstringer.com/peso/annette_anne.jpg
Odd enough to be supernatural(?) or a sign, (christening, mother's
best
graywolf:
there is no direct requirement that a cradle connect the camera to
anything more than a battery charger. Docking Station definately
implies a connection to the computer.
...but not nessecarily to a charger, right?
--
anders
-
http://anders.hultman.nu/
med dagens
Shel Belinkoff:
What, BTW, is the difference between software and firmware?
Firmware is software in an embedded system, placed so far inside a
gadget so you need some kind of tool to remove or replace it. Every
time you switch the gadget on, the firmware is there, and there is
room inside for
Don Sanderson:
Hey Frank, how did you sign up for gmail?
When I try it says it's only in a test phase, no way to sign up.
You'd have to get an invitation from another user. People with gmail
accounts occasionally get invitations that they can hand out. I
currently have two unused. Mail me if you
Anders Hultman wrote:
Turned out good for 9x13 and 9x15 cm prints.
Correction: 10x13 and 10x15 cm prints. The former from my Sony PS with
4:3 ratio and the latter from my *istD with 3:2 ratio. Fotolabo has a
special upload application where you can choose a paper format that fits
the original
Toralf Lund:
They give decent results on prints, though. I have twice ordered prints
from digital cameras, transfered them via the Internet and gotten them
in the mail.
Do you know anything about their film development service?
Nope. The only contact I have had with them is remote printing of
On Thu, 26 Aug 2004, Don Sanderson wrote:
Jostein what's the size in MM (or inches) of A2/A3?
A4210 x 297 mm 8.3 x 11.7 in
A3297 x 420 mm11.7 x 16.5 in
A2420 x 594 mm16.5 x 23.4 in
A4 is the standard sheet of writing, copy etc paper in this part of the
world. A3 is the
On Tue, 24 Aug 2004, frank theriault wrote:
I've always liked the French term for reversal
films: Diapositif.
In Swedish we usually call it dia but diapositiv is understood too.
anders
-
http://anders.hultman.nu/
med dagens bild och allt!
On Tue, 24 Aug 2004, frank theriault wrote:
Can't afford it. For what I'd get for my film stuff,
I'd not be able to afford the DSLR and peripheral
equipment, plus the computer and peripheral upgrades
I'd need. I think someone here said to expect to
spend at least what you spent on your
Rob Studdert:
I suspect people don't realize just how low resolution video (even HD) is
compared to even the most basic digicams.
American TV: 0,3 Mpix.
European TV: 0,4 Mpix.
I think HDTV is somewhere about 2 Mpix, but I'm not sure of that.
--
anders
-
Kevin Waterson:
Of course, every time an improvement has come along, picture
quality has suffered,
Some think this is the case, some think not, so I don't really think
you should say of course here.
there is further savings here also. There is an increasing amount of image
editting
Typo here.
Rob Brigham:
Does the CRT display its data from the sensor, or does it read back what
has been written to the tape/media?
It has to be data from the sensor, or else the tape player must have
separate playback heads after the record heads. I don't think that is
the case in either Betacam SP or
ERN:
Didn't some of the prosumer Olympus digitals (SLR-style but with
permanently
attached lenses) have optical viewfinders?
Yes, the 2020 and the 5060 both have it that way.
Are those SLR-like models? I was thinking E-10, E-20, but only what I remember
reading about them as I've never
Is there a button cell inside the camera that keeps the clock
working ?
This is the way it works on the *istD.
There's even a special battery lid for this cell.
It's possible. However, it's also quite possible that there's a
capacitor that stores enough of a charge to keep the clock working
ERN:
Now that would be an interesting discussion. For the moment they're about
same price same size, with the prosumers having fixed lens and high
sensor noise as main disadvantages. But there's a conceptual difference
there. Electronic viewfinders vs. optical with mirror and pentaprism. ...
J. C. O'Connell:
I think the question was 50 or 100mm. Go go the 100 if you can afford it
the working distance for the same results makes all the difference in
the world... Vic
It will not give the same results as the 50mm, it is a 100mm after all
now isnt it? Once you get near 1:1 the 100mm has
William Robb:
Through the magic of thread drift, we have lost track of one of the
original poster's parameters, which was maximum magnification on a
bellows.
For this, the 50 will be the better choice, since it will give more
magnification than the 100 at any given extension.
You mean if I both
Rob Studdert:
In order to show the visible (but sometimes subtle) differences that
FL makes I
set up a semi-scientific macro test (2:1) using 50, 125 and 200 macro lenses.
(...)
The easiest way to compare the images is to DL them and use an image browser
with sync capabilities like ThumbsPlus,
Exciting with the new lenses. Could someone please explain what the
difference in focal length will mean for macro shots? I fully
understand what difference it makes in regular shooting conditions,
but wouldn't life size 1:1 magnification become 1:1 regardless?
What difference does it make
J. C. O'Connell:
Focal length differences are the same for macro as
for regular shooting: a 100mm is going to give only
half the angle of view as a 50mm, but there is one
thing you have to keep in mind though and that is
the effective focal length DOUBLES by the time you
get to 1:1 vs. infinity,
Mark Roberts:
Exciting with the new lenses. Could someone please explain what the
difference in focal length will mean for macro shots? I fully
understand what difference it makes in regular shooting conditions,
but wouldn't life size 1:1 magnification become 1:1 regardless?
What difference does
http://www.chalkak.co.kr/board1/view.html?bID=Breviewnumber=433
Is this a joke?
The zxD logo seems very photoshopped to me.
--
anders
-
http://anders.hultman.nu/
med dagens bild och allt!
Don Sanderson:
In that article Mike says:
quote
All-purpose 28-200mm zoom lenses:
Bad snapshots. Also great for making five rolls of
film last a whole year. All-purpose = no purpose
end quote
Do you folks agree or disagree with this?
I've been thinking this range would make a good
graywolf:
How often do you use a 200? Oh, then why would you want to carry the thing
around all the time?
I use 200 all the time. Outdoors I constantly change between wide
angle to get the big picture and long tele to get detail. So for me,
a 28-200 makes a very suitable walk around lens as Don
So after some days of hacking, I now present my own MakerNote removal tool:
http://anders.hultman.nu/data/makernote/
I found and corrected a coding error yesterday, so now there is a new
version on the above page. In the old version (0.9.0) I didn't adjust
the offset value to the thumbnail
John Francis:
I'm back to my occasional hobby of peering into the Pentax
digital image file format. My latest discovery has been to
identify where Pentax hide the code to identify the lens
(which isn't available in the standard EXIF information).
This is interesting. I just wrote a program to
When I publish pictures on my web site I usually scale them down to
500 pixels in width. The files typically become 20 to 60 kbytes each.
When I started to publish pictures from my *istD i noticed that they
were significantly larger, often in excess of 100 kbytes. After a
while I found out
Joseph Tainter:
Great, Anders.
However, I haven't worked with raw code in nearly 30 years. Please,
some instructions on how to put this to use.
The program is written in Perl. Maybe not the best choice, but it's
the only programming language that I know well enough to accomplish
such a thing.
Ryan Lee:
Anyone have a good software, which reads camera orientation info in EXIF
tags and does an automatic, lossless batch rotation, to recommend? A friend
of mine was telling me about his C***n ixus s400 having an orientation
sensor, which I thought was pretty spiffy. He also mentioned
On examining the JPEG files that the *istD produce, I have found that
they contain an unusually large entry in the EXIF data called
MakerNote. This entry is in excess of 50 Kbytes. Does anyone know
what kind of data it contains?
It feels quite silly to keep it in the file when I have resized
Henri:
Specifically, in Sweden a pastor was recently sentenced to 30 days in
jail for simiply reading Bible passages which dealt with a Christian
view of homosexuality.
What's more fascinating is that I haven't heard of this said pastor.
And I _live_ in Sweden.
The story is true, and have gotten
Tom C:
2. Morals have declined significantly in the past 100 or so years.
I don't agree. Morals have changed, for certain, but I'd say that
most of these changes have been for the better. My assessment is that
people on average are more happy now than a hundred years ago, and
that is partly due
Antonio Aparicio:
So, is anyone gonna let me in on what the rules are? I have asked before
but they seem to be some sort of secret or something as nothing then
materialized. From my experience so far with this group, the rules seem
to change depending on who is involved and how long you have been
This M lens, however, kinda does work, but not really as expected:
Cosinon-T 135/3.5
Metering with the green button works, but only at full aperture. The
lens don't ever stop down, not at metering nor exposure.
alex wetmore:
Look to see if there is anything unusual on the mount around where
Mark Roberts:
There are plenty of (poorly designed) web sites that won't work if you
have scripting (JavaScript) turned off, but I can't remember ever
finding one that wouldn't work because I had Active-X turned off.
Some webmail systems.
anders
-
http://anders.hultman.nu/
On Thu, 1 Jul 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Er det ønskelig med flere språk nå, eller blir det bare sært med
norske bokstaver?
De norska tecknen ser helt okej ut härifrån, men jag är kanske partisk :-)
anders
-
http://anders.hultman.nu/
med dagens bild och allt!
On Mon, 28 Jun 2004, frank theriault wrote:
I hate Hotmail. I guess ya gets what ya pays for, eh?
I can recommend Gmail, Google's new web mail service.
Makes mailing lists very easy to follow, too.
anders
-
http://anders.hultman.nu/
med dagens bild och allt!
Completely disagree. There are time I like to shoot very chose to the
subject for some interesting effect. The background will appear very
out-of-focus.
Like this one, for example:
http://anders.hultman.nu/album/en/pride-2003?13
anders
-
http://anders.hultman.nu/
On Thu, 24 Jun 2004, Frantisek Vlcek wrote:
ND Actually, I was right the first time because ISO goes to 3200 (4 digits) and
ND remaining number recordable images display only has 3 digits - so it can't
ND be done.
Ugh Ogh. How about 1.6K or 3.2K ? Is it too hard to understand ? ;-)
Or
On Thu, 24 Jun 2004, keller.schaefer wrote:
1.6K and 3.2K still are four symbols, but 1K6 and 3K2 may fit. If the
display isn't figures only, and actually can show a K at all...
16h and 32h would work fine for me...
Ah. Excellent solution! Three symbols and possible to show on a 7-segment
Malcolm Smith:
Now come on, every one likes flying - it's crashing that people don't like.
What other form of travel could bang on about how safe it is and insist that
people depart from something called a 'terminal'?
Bus terminals, ferry terminals and even train terminals have already
been
On Tue, 22 Jun 2004, Michel Carrère-Gée wrote:
Does the cable remote have some additional functions that
warrant purchasing it rather than the wireless one?
Remote IR is only operable from front of the body !
I suppose that cable generally is more reliable than IR, especially in
bright
On Fri, 18 Jun 2004, Jens Bladt wrote:
Vivitar 400mm 5.6, K-mount (MF)
Anyone know this lens?
I have one. What do you want to know?
It's a Vivitar 400mm f/5.6 with a K-mount, at least.
Not sure of what you mean by (MF) though.
anders
-
http://anders.hultman.nu/
med
On Fri, 18 Jun 2004, Tom C wrote:
I think it's stupid but no more than any other Official this or that.
MM's the offical candy of the WInter Olympics. I could have that slightly
wrong but the same for Coca-Cola, Subaru, you name it.
Yes, but the thing is that MM have been appointed that
Tom C:
I realize everything you said... I know there's no official internet
organization... PENTAX did not say there is... they are simply using
this slogan like any other advertiser...
But if they don't say that there is an official internet
organization, who appointed them then? If they are
On Tue, 15 Jun 2004, Bob W wrote:
1. Is photography officially allowed inside the airport buildings?
That varies from country to country. (...)
2. Is photography officially allowed on the planes?
I have never had any problems with this.
That would probably also vary from contry to
On Wed, 16 Jun 2004, Tanya Mayer Photography wrote:
BTW, it totally sucks shooting on commercial airline. The windows are two
layers, and made of this plasticky stuff. There is usually fingerprints and
scratches and stuff all over them.
The figerprints and scratches would be so totally out
On Thu, 10 Jun 2004, Shawn K. wrote:
PLONK (whatever the hell that means)
http://www.clueless.com/jargon3.0.0/plonk.html
anders
-
http://anders.hultman.nu/
med dagens bild och allt!
On Fri, 11 Jun 2004, Cesar Matamoros II wrote:
Graffiti in the Stockholm Underground:
http://anders.hultman.nu/pickup/DSC04321_(031127)_.JPG
Your first photo brings to mind the proposed ban on photography in the New
York City subway system. I read where about 100 photographers protested
On Wed, 9 Jun 2004, William M Kane wrote:
Idea is this. Everyone posts there x-numbered picture from their *ist
D . . . say maybe their 4321st picture? The number shouldn't be too
high to start with, since some people don't have THAT many pictures . .
With my Sony PS I have rolled over
On Tue, 8 Jun 2004, Kevin Waterson wrote:
Will anyone here try to photograph the Transit of Venus that will take
place in some eight hours? (05:19 to 11:22 GMT)
I was curious as to what methods people are using to photograph
the sun like this. My 1,000,000X ND filter is missing.
I have a
On Tue, 8 Jun 2004, Henri Toivonen wrote:
I managed to see it too, after all. Took one roll of b/w and one roll of
color neg film with a 400mm lens.
Damn, we had a really cloudy day up here in Haparanda. Was it nice?
It was raining heavily in Stockholm so at 6:30 it was time to think of a
On Mon, 7 Jun 2004, Tom C wrote:
No, not intending to debate the chicken or egg. It's obvious the chicken
came first.
If you accept the evolution theory, the answer would actually be that the
egg came first. It was laid by an animal that was nearly, but not quite, a
hen.
anders
Will anyone here try to photograph the Transit of Venus that will take
place in some eight hours? (05:19 to 11:22 GMT)
The weather forecast here in Stockholm doesn't look to good, so I may well
miss it, but if the sky is clear tomorrow, I will set up a tripod and a
400 mm lens with proper
On Mon, 7 Jun 2004, Steve Sharpe wrote:
I'm going to try through my Celestron 5...though it is raining here
right now...
It's raining here too, but I have just gotten access to a fast car and a
driver, and will soon ride some 100 miles west to try to catch it there.
anders
Classic MF camera maker Hasselblad has been taken by surprise by the
quick shift from film to digital. Half a year ago they let 25
employees go, and now they've given notice to another 50 -- of
currently 180.
The market is weak, especially in Europe, says managing director
Lars Pappila. The
Steve Jolly:
Lars Pappila talks about a dramatic change that gives extra effect
for the production side, since digital cameras don't require the
same amount of manufacturing work as the old film technology.
Huh?
Well I don't know. That's what the managing director says in the
newspaper anyway.
Shaun Canning:
Check out the auctions at:
http://cgi6.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewSellersOtherItemsuserid=scann
i01include=0since=-1sort=3rows=50
Sorry if the link truncatees. I can't set my page width any higher.
A handy tip is to place long links between and marks. Several
e-mail programs
J. C. O'Connell:
there is a web site called tinyurl.com that converts long links
into little ones, havent tried it but I have seen and used the
tinyurl redirection links.
Competitor shorl.com makes even shorter links.
It's also run by a couple of friends of mine :-)
anders
On Fri, 21 May 2004, Henri Toivonen wrote:
I wasn't allowed to, during my brief encouter with the Swedish
military. I'd have to register my camera with the higher officers and
have every picture approved for security reasons.
Was it a while ago?
Yes, it was in 1990. Fourteen years
On Wed, 19 May 2004, frank theriault wrote:
Rob,
I know you meant well, but now you've gone and ruined it. I had no idea
that Badger is a phone company, and they just want to get me to buy one.
A phone company? From here it looks like the badgerphone.co.uk web site is
a personal web site
On Tue, 18 May 2004, Yefei He wrote:
I live in Iowa too and I don't raise hogs or corn. I do run
over badgers from time to time:-)
http://www.badgerbadgerbadger.com/
anders
-
http://anders.hultman.nu/
med dagens bild och allt!
On Tue, 18 May 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You really want to get into an argument about whether people should eat beef
at all? Because cattle are laying waste to large areas of land with their
grazing?
Oh, the cattle are laying waste to large areas of land with their grazing?
Good thing
On Fri, 14 May 2004, Ryan Lee wrote:
What about Åland?
Autonomous part of Finland, with mostly Swedish-speaking population.
anders
-
http://anders.hultman.nu/
med dagens bild och allt!
On Thu, 13 May 2004, Ryan Lee wrote:
German users, what's the difference between AntWort and Svar?
Antwort means answer in German.
Svar means answer in Danish and Swedish.
Svar is, as far as I know, not a German word at all.
However, it is very silly of Microsoft to have translated the Re:
On Thu, 13 May 2004, Frantisek Vlcek wrote:
I am curious, does any maker of the image tanks give important
information like the make of the hdd inside (some cheap crap or
what?), vibration/impact it can stand (normalised for peak impact and
long vibration, both in standby and operation) and
1 have you ever made self portraits ?
Yes, several times.
2 If yes , serious ore funny ones, did you choose a theme ?
Both serious and funny. And once in a while even a theme.
3 If no, why not?
4 How did you do it, with a remote control or the build in self timer ?
*
John Forbes:
What does strumpbyxor? Sounds interesting.
Stretch tights; panty hose.
She has two pairs on at the same time.
anders
-
http://anders.hultman.nu/
med dagens bild och allt!
What does strumpbyxor? Sounds interesting.
Stretch tights; panty hose.
It sounds much more interesting in English than it is...
I checked my dictionary; I didn't know the word strumpet before,
actually. But now I see what you mean.
However, in Swedish, strump- doesn't bring up those thoughts
On Fri, 23 Apr 2004, J. C. O'Connell wrote:
What he did forget was to burn at the slowest possible
burn speed your burner will allow. Makes for most reliable
playback.
Not always true. Some claim that there is a smear effect when burning
too slow. The laser heats up the disc where the beam
1 - 100 of 203 matches
Mail list logo
