I installed Enfuse and tried a macro focus stack but the result is
awful. Now I'm not sure if I should pay something or give up on it. Is
Enfuse better suited to larger scenes like landscapes?
What is the customary donation for this type of thing?
is there a better way to focus stack macros in
Matthew Hunt wrote:
There's also File Scripts Load Files into Stack within Photoshop.
This is how I (actually Susan while I watched) did it. She as
Photoshop on her Mac. I however don't have it on my Windows machine.
I'll have to go through 2 learning curves simultaneously to focus
stack in
this is how I (Susan) did it.
I would have preferred to do this in Lightroom because I don't have
Photoshop. My SO does have it but it's on a Mac and I'm using Windows.
I'll have to use her machine and go through two learning curves
simultaneously to focus stack with Photoshop. Please just kill
Tom,
Both Zerene Stacker and Helicon Focus have trial versions. There is some
functionality built into Photoshop too, starting (I think) with version CS.
Have a go at the first two an see if you're more comfortable with the
workflow in those. It's probably a good idea to view the tutorials too
very well executed Ken. I like it a lot. Terrific use of lines. The
color of the one brown line on the very left side of the frame is
possibly a bit too saturated for the rest of the elements in the
image. Or maybe you wanted it that way.
Great work.
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 4:17 AM, Brian
that's a quadrawingus flyaboutia
On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 3:37 PM, Ken Waller kwal...@peoplepc.com wrote:
Captured this unnamed dragonfly last June in the Upper Peninsula of
Michigan.
Any idea as to it scientific name is appreciated - for now I'm calling it
Fred.
Registration is still open at 10:53 PM EST on 01 Apr 15. Su Wilson
and I are registered.
On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 10:14 AM, Stanley Halpin
s...@stans-photography.info wrote:
Thanks for the reminder. I just signed up.
stan
On Apr 1, 2015, at 9:48 AM, John sesso...@earthlink.net wrote:
I'm
hi Larry, interesting project. You might want to put some kind of
compressible material between the wood and the mirrors. With your
current design, the mirrors could break if the wood shrinks during a
period of low humidity. You could eliminate the problem if you rotate
the wood so the grain runs
I agree with Paul. That fog picture is really good.
On Sat, Mar 28, 2015 at 1:15 PM, Paul pentax1...@gmail.com wrote:
I'd vote for the third one down of the trees in the fog. For me it's the
most moody, with the tree silhouettes receding into the fog.
-p
On 3/24/2015 9:56 PM, Mark C wrote:
thanks for the replies folks
On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 2:45 AM, Malcolm Smith rrve...@virginmedia.com wrote:
Tom Reese wrote:
A scan of a slide I shot with my MZ-S after I got home from the Tony
Sweet class at Grandfather Mountain. Shot by double exposing the frame
with one shot slightly out
you got enough of the people in the frame to show the relative size of
the beast and a sense of the menace it presents.
On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 11:20 PM, David Mann dmann...@gmail.com wrote:
It's surprising how little a large croc needs to eat... but it's not
surprising how much care they need
swim with the crocs? that's a sneaky way to get them fed.
On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 11:13 PM, David Mann dmann...@gmail.com wrote:
A sign I liked at Crocosaurus Cove in Darwin...
http://gallery.multi.net.nz/photo/893/#peso
Cheers,
Dave
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
A scan of a slide I shot with my MZ-S after I got home from the Tony
Sweet class at Grandfather Mountain. Shot by double exposing the frame
with one shot slightly out of focus.
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=17993552
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
I already told the story that I now have a Canon digital slr. My other
photography items:
an infrared wildlife camera that I sometimes set up in the backyard.
I've captured foxes, raccoons, opossums and deer with it. No coyotes
yet though I have heard them howl in the woods behind the house.
a
no wonder my cuneiform always looks like crap. I've been trying to do
it in the dark.
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 3:54 PM, Mark Roberts
postmas...@robertstech.com wrote:
Darren Addy wrote:
Your smart phone or tablet is a portable light table for viewing
negatives and slides.
Also makes a great
in special to fix registration
problems at midnight they should just delay the start of registration
until the staff got to work in the morning.
Looks like that's what they're doing this year.
On 3/22/2015 5:35 PM, Tom Reese wrote:
thanks for the heads up. This event used to sell out
as a person of (partial) Welsh heritage I have mutton to say except sheep lie.
On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 4:44 PM, Bob W-PDML p...@web-options.com wrote:
On 22 Mar 2015, at 20:31, Toine to...@repiuk.nl wrote:
Hi Mike
I'm already at home ;) This brand of cattle is called Scottish
Highlanders
yeah I miss my old Mustang. That was real easy to work on. I guess I'm
pining for the Ford.
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 5:17 PM, John sesso...@earthlink.net wrote:
I pine for the days when you didn't have to remove half the engine bay
just to change a headlamp.
--
Science - Questions we may
grits are okay if served infrequently in small quantities
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 1:52 PM, Alan C c...@lantic.net wrote:
An interesting discussion. I had never heard the term grits before. Here,
mieliepap is the staple diet of the masses and a popular side dish with
tomato relish at a
smells like fraud to me. My guess is that they're looking for people
to send them an email. They'll reply and offer a lower price if the
sale is conducted privately then never ship the item. I doubt that the
supposed seller even has the stuff.
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 6:42 PM, steve harley
I think it comes from the period right after Kodak invented color in
the mid 1950's. We here in the US had it long before the rest of the
world and at least 10 years before it reached Europe. I can vaguely
remember waking up one morning and finding that the trees had turned
from gray to green. We
I dunno Rick. Crop that distracting stuff off the top and the OOF
leaves off the bottom and you have an interesting contrast of life and
death with the emerging flowers and the pumpkin.
On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 5:13 PM, Rick Womer rickpic...@gmail.com wrote:
If you leave your Jack-o-lantern out
not a Pulitzer prize winner but interesting
On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 5:27 PM, Rick Womer rickpic...@gmail.com wrote:
Tom,
Here it is, Past-It Pumpkin Panorama:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=17991298
Still not ooh-aah material.
Rick
On Mar 22, 2015, at 5:16 PM, Tom Reese wrote
thanks for the heads up. This event used to sell out in a couple
hours. My perception is that it now takes a few days. Is that correct?
On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 5:16 PM, John sesso...@earthlink.net wrote:
I got an email from Grandfather Mountain about the Nature Photography
Weekend.
Most of
it's interesting how these internet forums and anonymity bring out the
worst in those with personality disorders. These people seem normal
(based on the fact that they're apparently still running around loose)
but they turn into raving lunatics when they get behind a keyboard.
On Sun, Mar 22,
interesting reading. I've been wanting to try some of those
astrophotography shots if I ever find a dark enough place on a clear
night. That focus issue has me a little stumped.
I found this particularly interesting: ...as Canon points out, many
of today's wide-angle zooms are simply inverted
excellent work Ann. Congratulations on your exhibit.
On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 8:19 PM, Ann Sanfedele ann...@nyc.rr.com wrote:
Especially to the attention, Rick and Dan - who a close enough to get
there..
I announced this on facebook earlier today
Save the date! Saturday, April 4th - Opening
wow quite a transformation makes me wonder if the old boat in the
first pic is still afloat
thanks for taking the time to hunt that one down
On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 8:20 PM, Ann Sanfedele ann...@nyc.rr.com wrote:
For Tom - who wanted to see what's there now -
This is pretty close
awesome shot. I was going to ask if it was a stitched panorama or
cropped but I see you already answered that it's cropped.
terrific image
On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 4:32 PM, Daniel J. Matyola danmaty...@gmail.com wrote:
A telephoto view of Mauna Kea, on the Big Island of Hawaii, taken from
the
Ann, I like the shot just fine as is but would still like to see what
it looks like today
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 5:03 PM, Ann Sanfedele ann...@nyc.rr.com wrote:
On 3/20/2015 15:11, John wrote:
Shouldn't that have been if my piers find it interesting?
May have to dock you for that groaner
yeah this thread has gone to hull
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 10:05 PM, Rick Womer rickpic...@gmail.com wrote:
Please! No moor puns!
http://photo.net/photos/RickW
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 5:03 PM, Ann Sanfedele ann...@nyc.rr.com wrote:
On 3/20/2015 15:11, John wrote:
Shouldn't that have been
probably nothing new to some of you but I learned quite a bit from this:
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/explora/photography/tips-and-solutions/how-focus-works?BI=4906
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please
I thought this was a photo of the PDML Canadian contingent while they
were still in hibernation?
Well spotted Rick. A nice bit of whimsy.
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 2:12 PM, Alan C c...@lantic.net wrote:
I always wondered what happened to the Triffids.
Alan C
-Original Message- From:
to reduce the slide:
remember that rudeness turns people off (not aimed at anyone at all -
a general observation from many forums over many years)
try to help when people ask for it
people participate because the list is informative, entertaining and
it provides social interaction - any others?
, crop when needed and convert to jpg.
That's it. No levels, no sharpening, no anything.
It's very good to know that the PDML is still going. I'll contribute
when I can but there's not much I can offer.
Tom Reese
edit sorry if this is a duplicate post the first one doesn't seem to
have reached
directly to caka...@gmail.com
Thanks for looking.
Tom
http://boise.craigslist.org/sys/4576058268.html
http://boise.craigslist.org/pho/4575670434.html
http://boise.craigslist.org/pho/4575626519.html
http://boise.craigslist.org/clt/4575286033.html
http://boise.craigslist.org/ele/4575269558
One other item. I excluded earlier because I thought I may have a
local buyer, but no additional contact as of yet.
A Sony NEX-5 with 2 lenses.
Asking $350.
http://boise.craigslist.org/pho/4574042602.html
The 3 legacy lenses and the DVD recorder are sold.
Thanks.
Tom
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss
And one more I forgot:
Garmin GPSMAP 60CSx Receiver - NIB - $200
http://boise.craigslist.org/spo/4576711227.html
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the
From: Mark Roberts postmas...@robertstech.com
Bruce wrote:
I couldn't have said it better myself Tom. The entire concept of photography
is to create an image from the mind/concept/perspective of the photographer.
To think that any photograph represents the unaltered truth is ridiculous.
That's
(I hate when I forget to edit the subject. Sorry for the double post)
From: Mark Roberts postmas...@robertstech.com
Bruce wrote:
I couldn't have said it better myself Tom. The entire concept of photography
is to create an image from the mind/concept/perspective of the photographer.
To think
one
can.
Tom C.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
of things though... ?
Tom C.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
I'd say (and have said) is that to believe that an
unaltered image is any more truthful or objective than an unaltered
image, in the context of reporting, and stopping there, thinking the
rules of integrity are satisfied or broken based on that criteria
alone, is IMO, incorrect.
Tom C.
--
PDML
. You're totally correct.
I'll be back after I go fire myself.
Tom
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
, if words can be edited and changed, to craft the
story, then the same standard should apply to images.
Misleading with an image is obviously wrong.
Photos are not truth and never were.
Tom C.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE
Inventory.
Tom C.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
this is a publicity stunt on the part of the photographer. I
wonder how many job offers he's been receiving since that.
Tom C.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
.
Tom C.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
in question, the superfluous video camera was never part of the
intended message to begin with.
Tom C.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
On 23/01/2014 9:49 PM, Tom C wrote:
The problem I see is that there's a basic assumption that the photons
entering the lens and recorded on the media somehow represent THE
TRUTH. I believe that assumption is flawed.
---
That's because your basic assumption
can't purchase a new Pentax camera.
Tom C.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
. It would be easy to do at less than 1/2 the price.
On the other hand it's 83% of the price of a D800E, so giving up 20MP
at that price is a bit hard to swallow.
Tom C.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please
, if not a necessity.
I hope that was clear to all by my responses on the subject, and that
I was addressing the subject of getting good shots in a more generic
sense.
As Stan summed up, quality vs. quantity. And of course quantity if the
subject dictates.
Tom C.
I shoot a lot of shows along side other
'. I can see I
possibly approached the subject starting off on the wrong foot. My
intent was not to insult. I'm sorry if anyone felt that way.
Tom C.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link
From: Eric Weir eew...@bellsouth.net
My understanding is that the secret to getting good shots is taking a lot of
them.
Really? Is that the way you think most people get 'good shots'?
To get good shots, one must take shots, but the secret isn't taking a
lot of them.
Tom C.
--
PDML Pentax
From: Alan C c...@lantic.net
Why do fashion photographers take so many shots then?
Alan
Why don't you ask them or read up on the subject? See if they agree
with such a simplistic approach to creating good imagery.
Tom C.
-Original Message-
From: Tom C
Sent: Wednesday, October
From: Bob Sullivan rf.sulli...@gmail.com
Tom,
In the film days, each shot was $.25 and only pros took lots of shots.
Now the cost per shot is almost zero, and the tyros 'spray and pray'.
I enjoy taking more shots now, trying to work things out and saving
money on film.
I hope it's
. That's the smartest answer I can give.
Tom C.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
Darren wrote:
It is unfortunate that this thread has devolved into the crapfest that
one can now (apparently) expect whenever Tom decides to post something
to this list.
ad hominem
Tom C.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Darren you're a blowhard.
Tom C.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
beginner.
Tom C.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
a FF camera for less
than the A, considering economies of scale. Just putting a FF sensor
in a K-3 and adding the additional cost would bring it close, not to
mention additional likely changes to shutter, stabilization, and more.
Well, I have to disagree with you here, Tom. Pentax is not forced
, or examined the output image
quality produced, since they won't be released to the public until
December.
Tom C.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
to afford them at the moment goes to my
first point .
Tom C.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
have you got a chance to listen to Paul McCartney's new album
entitled New? It was released in US on 10-15. As usual, I love most
tracks.
Tom C.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly
the D800E, I take the NEX-7 kit which is 1/8 the weight and
1/5 the size. So basically I agree.
Just thinking that back 10+ years ago, these options didn't exist.
Tom C.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please
, but leapfrogs???
It's still a 24MP camera that's a year and a half to two years late.
It's amazing that 3 months ago the K-5/K-5II fulfilled everyone's
needs and 'why would one want more resolution?', and now it's goo-goo
ga-ga over the K-3.
Tom C.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
of the lens at X
aperture, and yes noise characteristics, etc.), then you're missing
something.
Your use of the word 'only' was presumptuous and mistaken.
Tom C.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit
.
Not that being presumptuous and mistaken is entirely foreign to me, however.
:)
See above.
Tom C.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
, it was too late. If it had been the
K-7 I might have felt differently, but as it was, I was tired of
waiting, and I'd still be waiting for FF.
Tom C.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly
Larry wrote:
For whatever it's worth, the one time that I had a chance to compare
a K-5 side by side with a D7000 in a low light situation (in the -2EV to 2EV
range), the K-5 vastly outperformed the D7000 in every regard.
I'm not here to argue the merits of a K-5 vs. D7000 Larry. Why would I?
I'm not here to argue the merits of a K-5 vs. D7000 Larry. Why would I?
But then you do:-)
That's BS Paul and you know it. :)
Tom C.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly
it is not that much time to wait
anyway.
My thoughts as well Boris. At this point in time all we know is that
the difference between Prime II and Prime III is I.
Tom C.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML
From: steve harley p...@paper-ape.com
on 2013-09-22 22:23 Tom C wrote
Here's where I coming from on this. To say one's images wouldn't or
couldn't benefit from increased resolution is like saying they
couldn't benefit by using a finer grained film (in the day) or a
higher quality lens
? Yes. No argument whatsoever.
That is not the same question as: Will one's images likely benefit
from increased resolution? The answer to that is also yes.
Tom C.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please
.
Tom C.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
high priced item especially with next
day Fedex.
I received a 25% off discount code just today. SALE2013
Tom C.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
images I've seen are quite good.
There's a whole sub-culture of NEX, 4/3, and Fuji users that are
producing wonderful images with legacy lenses.
Not everyone eschews them.
How was your trip to BC, Bill?
Tom C
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo
viewfinder.
As Boris suggests, you may be pleasantly surprised.
Tom C.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
, one is almost blind.
Take a look through a NEX-6 or 7 EVF. It's a 2.3 million pixel image.
That's more than twice the pixel count of the LCD monitor.
Tom C.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit
Well not really looking through... looking at.
Tom C.
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 7:15 AM, Tom C caka...@gmail.com wrote:
Years ago somebody bought a digital PS with a digital viewfinder.
I was instantly turned off by the lines on the screen.
Tell me it's better now???
Regards, Bob S.
Hi Bob
pair of glasses.
Tom C.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
Shooting mode, where
the shutter is depressed constantly, that it it automatically turns
off image review and one simply sees the normal EVF view, unhindered.
Tom C.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit
as the RX-1 has.
Tom C.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
imaging and blew it, they're going to try again.
Tom C.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
too.
G
I'd agree with that argument. Nothing like being a victim of one's success.
Tom C.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
to the principals office for doing it.
Mark
That's pretty hilarious. I can see them wanting to disrupt, like
shaking things up in the market, but that's still an odd choice of
words. As you allude to, it has negative connotations as opposed to
positive.
Tom C.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML
On 5 Sep 2013, at 18:22, Bob W p...@web-options.com wrote:
On 5 Sep 2013, at 16:17, Tom C caka...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't know... If you go to kodak.com and click into the site you will
see that two of their three main goals are disrupting product goods
packaging and disrupting functional
lenses, but a sign the E-mount is being taken seriously
Tom C.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
cheap lenses, but a sign the E-mount is being taken seriously
Tom C.
It's about time Sony took something seriously.
bill
What do you mean? The NEX-7 is one serious camera.
Dpreviews conclusion was in 2011: It's no stretch to say that, at its
best, the NEX-7 offers the finest still image
to explain the benefits of a FF sensor to you.
If/when Pentax releases a FF body, and you purchase it, I'll pose the
same question back to you. :)
Tom C.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit
from Pentax that wants a visible upgrade path.
I'm not dismissing APS-C. I'm saying Pentax needs a 24 x 36 body if
they hope to maintain any relevancy in the marketplace, which after
all is the raison d'etre (money making).
Tom C.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net
). :)
Tom C.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
From: Darren Addy pixelsmi...@gmail.com
Yeah, well, that may be your rationale but it also comes with a heft
price tag that has to be factored in for anybody wishing to make a
similar evaluation involving chucking their PK m42 glass.
What I particularly like about this particular bit of
From: Bill anotherdrunken...@gmail.com
On 19/07/2013 2:01 PM, Tom C wrote:
I also agree that the legacy lens advantage is pretty much non-existent.
It's interesting that you should say that, and kind of ironic in a way.
The reason why legacy lenses are not an advantage is because
to deliberately misunderstand
things and then pontificates.
Tom C.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
, at the same time as I bought the *ist D. That was
foolish... :)
I also agree that the legacy lens advantage is pretty much non-existent.
Tom C
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly
From: Rick Womer rwomer1...@yahoo.com
Well, no, Tom, the situations aren't at all parallel. ?
I'm very, very happy to be using MRIs and PET/CTs. ?I'm also very happy to be
using a K-5 instead of an istD or Super Program.
The technology has its place, though. ?I don't get an MRI on every
private you meant public).
(I'm not at all pushing to change, just figured it might be worth
revisiting, haven't seen any mention in the ~6 months I've been here.)
Maybe for the simple and obvious fact that it's a list?
Tom C.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net
of their hand and say I think I'll go with Pentax?
Tom C.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
1 - 100 of 10161 matches
Mail list logo
