http://roman.blakout.net/?blog=20061215141746
^^^ A hands on fisheye-zoom...
--
new photos ever so often... http://roman.blakout.net/
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
I don't think that's CA, I've got a 12mm Asuma, (1960's-1970's Sigma),
fisheye that has plenty of CA. What you're pointing to looks more like
digital bloom.
Roman wrote:
http://roman.blakout.net/?blog=20061215141746
^^^ A hands on fisheye-zoom...
--
Things should be made as simple
Har!
Dave
On 11/27/06, Kostas Kavoussanakis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 26 Nov 2006, David Savage wrote:
http://www.arach.net.au/~savage/Misc/IMGP5038.jpg
I would see a doctor right away.
http://www.arach.net.au/~savage/Misc/IMGP4979.jpg
Custom-made?
Kostas
--
PDML
closeups with fisheye zoom, but I'm not sure it'd focus this
close. Ideas appreciated
Roman.
--
new photos ever so often... http://roman.blakout.net/
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
that motorized AF can focus
as close as 1 inch (2.5cm). Can anyone please confirm this from their
own experience. Such close macro would give dramatic perspective to a
macro closeups with fisheye zoom, but I'm not sure it'd focus this
close. Ideas appreciated
Roman.
--
new photos ever so often
- Original Message -
From: Roman
Subject: SMC-DA 10-17mm f3.5-4.5 fisheye-zoom and super macro
In technical specification closest focus distance is 14centimeters but
in Photodo forums there was posting stated that motorized AF can focus
as close as 1 inch (2.5cm). Can anyone please
On Sun, 26 Nov 2006, David Savage wrote:
http://www.arach.net.au/~savage/Misc/IMGP5038.jpg
I would see a doctor right away.
http://www.arach.net.au/~savage/Misc/IMGP4979.jpg
Custom-made?
Kostas
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
lThere has been much kudos on Pentax Lenses lately but here it is,
PopPhoto on Pentax new SLR lenses
http://www.popphoto.com/cameralenses/2861/slr-world-class-glass.html
--
home http://roman.blakout.net/
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
There's nothing new here, huh ...
2006/9/12, Roman [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
lThere has been much kudos on Pentax Lenses lately but here it is,
PopPhoto on Pentax new SLR lenses
http://www.popphoto.com/cameralenses/2861/slr-world-class-glass.html
--
home http://roman.blakout.net/
--
PDML
Roman wrote:
lThere has been much kudos on Pentax Lenses lately but here it is,
PopPhoto on Pentax new SLR lenses
http://www.popphoto.com/cameralenses/2861/slr-world-class-glass.html
That would be the lens the 10-17 Fisheye Zoom replaced in the lineup.
-Adam
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss
. Clarke, or some other clever guy)
-Original Message-
From: Toine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 19. mars 2006 21:42
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: new fisheye zoom problems LBA in remission
While pixelpeeping I can see this fringing or CA on every lens on my
D
: Re: new fisheye zoom problems LBA in remission
While pixelpeeping I can see this fringing or CA on every lens
on my
D. Including the 16-45. I stopped pixelpeeping (100% zoom) and
now I'm
very happy with my lenses :) If I could afford it, I would buy a
10-14.
Toine
On 3/5/06, Peter Fairweather
On 5 Mar 2006 at 7:42, Peter Fairweather wrote:
http://www.pentax.fr/_fr/photo/lenses/index.php?photoproductsgruppe=68produkt=1795
Try Photo 3, terrible CA in the tree on the left
Not good enough for the money I feel
I agree it's pretty bad but it's also the only game in town, using the
to using the old fisheye zoom on my Z1p in
Barcelona and was delighted with the results. This made me even keener
on the new one for my DS, however the French Pentax site provided an
antidote!
http://www.pentax.fr/_fr/photo/lenses/index.php?photoproductsgruppe=68produkt=1795
Try Photo 3, terrible
- Original Message -
From: Toine
Subject: Re: new fisheye zoom problems LBA in remission
While pixelpeeping I can see this fringing or CA on every lens on my
D. Including the 16-45. I stopped pixelpeeping (100% zoom) and now I'm
very happy with my lenses :) If I could afford it, I
with my lenses :) If I could afford it, I would buy a
10-14.
Toine
On 3/5/06, Peter Fairweather [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I finally got round to using the old fisheye zoom on my Z1p in
Barcelona and was delighted with the results. This made me even keener
on the new one for my DS, however the French
On 19 Mar 2006 at 16:48, Paul Stenquist wrote:
In my experience, fringing and CA are two different things. Fringing is
immune to the CA fix in the PSCS converter. What is displayed on the
French Pentax site appears to be fringing. It seems to be common to all
digital cameras when
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: new fisheye zoom problems LBA in remission
While pixelpeeping I can see this fringing or CA on every lens on my
D. Including the 16-45. I stopped pixelpeeping (100% zoom) and now I'm
very happy with my lenses :) If I could afford it, I would buy a
10
Tim Øsleby wrote:
Pixelpeeping is a perversion ;-)
Is it more or less perverse than measurebating? :-)
--
Christian
http://photography.skofteland.net
Arthur C. Clarke, or some other clever guy)
-Original Message-
From: Christian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 20. mars 2006 01:51
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: new fisheye zoom problems LBA in remission
Tim Øsleby wrote:
Pixelpeeping is a perversion ;-)
Is it more
experience that the 12-24 is quite excellent, as
are the other DA lenses I own.
Paul
On Mar 5, 2006, at 2:42 AM, Peter Fairweather wrote:
I finally got round to using the old fisheye zoom on my Z1p in
Barcelona and was delighted with the results. This made me even keener
on the new one for my DS
On Mar 5, 2006, at 2:42 AM, Peter Fairweather wrote:
I finally got round to using the old fisheye zoom on my Z1p in
Barcelona and was delighted with the results. This made me even keener
on the new one for my DS, however the French Pentax site provided an
antidote!
http://www.pentax.fr
I finally got round to using the old fisheye zoom on my Z1p in
Barcelona and was delighted with the results. This made me even keener
on the new one for my DS, however the French Pentax site provided an
antidote!
http://www.pentax.fr/_fr/photo/lenses/index.php?photoproductsgruppe=68produkt=1795
Thought I would share this...
I was planning on selling my F 17-28 fisheye zoom today on ebay so I took
it with me to work to photograph and write a description. I've been
missing its capabilities since going digital so I just had to try to find
a reason for keeping it. So I thought to myself
Very interesting. How will this lens cope with the longer registry distance of
medF cameras?
Jostein
Quoting Krisjanis Linkevics [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Thought I would share this...
I was planning on selling my F 17-28 fisheye zoom today on ebay so I took
it with me to work to photograph
Jostein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting Krisjanis Linkevics [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I was planning on selling my F 17-28 fisheye zoom today on ebay so I took
it with me to work to photograph and write a description. I've been
missing its capabilities since going digital so I just had to try
KEH LN to EX+ (original box and everything, slight wear, perfect glass)
shipping from Latvia (EU) or from Los Angeles (a colleague of mine can
take it there and then ship it or hand it over)
reserve price 250$
will consider all offers
buyer pays shipping
Krisjanis
-0700
Selling my F 17-28/3.5-4.5 Fisheye zoom lens.
Selling my F 17-28/3.5-4.5 Fisheye zoom lens. It is in KEH EX+
condition. Comes with original caps. Hard to find on Ebay for
pricing. There is one with a BIN of $500. Focus Camera lists new for
$445. BH and Adorama don't list it. This is a very unique lens that
has no similar model from
i have this lens, and I like it very much.
-- Original Message --
From: Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2005 16:11:44 -0700
Selling my F 17-28/3.5-4.5 Fisheye zoom lens. It is in KEH EX+
condition. Comes
zoom
Sorry about the Sunday FS (as opposed to FS Friday).
I haven't used my SMC Pentax-F 17-28mm f/3.5-4.5 Fisheye zoom lately, so
I decided its time to make room in my bag for something else. Its
listed as of right now on eBay at:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=7505848119
I
Jens Bladt wrote regarding Sunday FS: Pentax fisheye zoom:
I think I noticed this lens at ebay. Isn't it USA only?
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=7505848119
My auction specifies USA only, but I've had two inquiries from Canada,
and have agreed to ship there. While I'm
Sorry about the Sunday FS (as opposed to FS Friday).
I haven't used my SMC Pentax-F 17-28mm f/3.5-4.5 Fisheye zoom lately, so
I decided its time to make room in my bag for something else. Its
listed as of right now on eBay at:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=7505848119
I
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: RE: How performs Pentax fisheye zoom 17-28 on *ist DS?
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 07:41:11 +0200
This list is really very nice!
With a few mails, even my un-asked questions are answered!
Thanks, you all.
Dave S asked:
Is that the super hero cape or the nurses uniform cape?
g
Pat responds: You have super-nurses? Send me one!!!
(Never seen a nurse in a cape.)
Pat White
Pentax fisheye zoom 17-28 on *ist DS?
Resent-From: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Resent-Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 14:30:41 -0500
Dave S asked:
Is that the super hero cape or the nurses uniform cape?
g
Pat responds: You have super-nurses? Send me one!!!
(Never seen a nurse in a cape.)
Pat
They use to wear nursing caps, too.
I know one, that wears a nursing bra.
Kenneth Waller
-Original Message-
From: Jim Apilado [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Mar 31, 2005 2:49 PM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: How performs Pentax fisheye zoom 17-28 on *ist DS?
Nurses in capes
Dear group,
I love my fisheye zoom on my Z-1.
But how will it perform on my future *ist DS?
Who has experience?
Greetings Jos
Hello Joe,
It will perform ok. You lose some of the dramatic wideness and the
lens is not overly sharp to begin with. I find that I almost always
use the DA 16-45 instead.
Here are a few shots from the fisheye zoom taken at wedding I did last
Saturday.
All were shot in available light
I've found it very useful on my * ist D, so I assume it would word as
well o the DS.
Joe wrote:
Dear group,
I love my fisheye zoom on my Z-1.
But how will it perform on my future *ist DS?
Who has experience?
Greetings Jos
pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2005 3:34 PM
Subject: How performs Pentax fisheye zoom 17-28 on *ist DS?
Dear group,
I love my fisheye zoom on my Z-1.
But how will it perform on my future *ist DS?
Who has experience?
Greetings Jos
Dear group,
I love my fisheye zoom on my Z-1.
But how will it perform on my future *ist DS?
Who has experience?
Greetings Jos
---
Keep in mind that there is a DA 10-20 fisheye forthcoming. It will do
for the APS-C sensor what the FA 17-28 did for 35 mm. I am awaiting it.
Joe
This list is really very nice!
With a few mails, even my un-asked questions are answered!
Thanks, you all.
Joe,
People often fail to recogonize us when we're not wearing our capes. :)
Tom C.
From: Joe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: RE: How performs Pentax fisheye zoom 17-28 on *ist DS?
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 07:41:11 +0200
This list is really
fun I suppose.
I still believe Pentax however, when they say (in the owners' manual) that
the 5.7-16mm fisheye zoom lens on my Optio 43WR is equivalent to 37 -
104mm in 35mm format. Now, I know that there are those who will shrug their
shoulders and shake their heads in disbelief at my
http://cgi6.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewSellersOtherItemsinclude=0userid=ericsktbrdrsort=3rows=25since=-1rd=1
17-28mm SMC Fisheye Zoom, and some stuff you may not be interested in link
above... :)
Also, not on ebay, I have one of the Xray proof film pouches that holds ~20
rolls. Make offer
At 11:55 AM 9/9/2003 +, Paul Delcour wrote:
Anyone have any experience with this Pentax fish-eye zoom? I'd like a
fish-eye and am doubting between the prime and the zoom. I already have a
Tokina 17mm/3.5 super wide angle and need more width.
It's not my most used lens, but I do use this from
Paul, several of us own the F 17-28 fisheye. It is quite a fun lens.
If you don't need the zoom, an alternative that is sharper and less
expensive is the Russian Zenitar 16 mm. f2.8 fisheye. It is available in
both K and M42 mounts. It does not have the A setting, though, and
likely never
Paul wrote:
I considered a fish-eye zoom, but then the distortion is always there.
Hi Paul,
What do you mean with distortion?
I have the FA17-28 zoom, but I only notice the fisheye distortion that
should be there.
Groeten, Jos
PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2003 11:34:51 -0600
To: pdml [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Fisheye zoom
Resent-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Resent-Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 13:32:47 -0400
Paul, several of us own the F 17-28 fisheye. It is quite a fun lens.
If you don't need
-Original Message-
From: Paul Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yep great, just want i wanted and even slower wide angle zoom!
Wheres the 18-35/2.8!
I agree, though a cheap wide zoom will probably sell very well for
them. You don't often hear the complaint here about a 2.8 version,
or not? If
not, then wont these FAJ lenses not be useable in AE and Manual modes on the
MZ-S?
Regards,
Paul
- Original Message -
From: Rüdiger Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2003 8:23 AM
Subject: New FAJ 18-35 full frame? and use of Fisheye Zoom
Hallo,
it seems
- Original Message -
From: jellymaster [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 11:04 PM
Subject: for sale pentax fisheye zoom and more k2, kx
pentax 17-28mm fisheye zoom $400us
K2 mint $170us
KX with 50mm lens $170us
or nearest offer
email off list
The lens in question is the SMC Pentax-F 17-28mm f3.5-4.5 fisheye zoom.
Here's the situation... the store I work for, Don's Photo, ordered one of
these in for a customer who changed his mind about taking it. Now we have
to get rid of it, and Winnipeg is too small of a market to do that easily
Nice shots, Mark. You used the fisheye well on the Kalamazoo Courthouse
shot - fisheye distortion nicely controlled.
Joe
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at
Bernd,
Here is the fisheye zoom showing fisheye effect :
http://pug.komkon.org/01sep/bkdpug.html
Here is the fisheye zoom zoomed in some with less effect :
http://pug.komkon.org/01jul/bkdpug.html
Bruce Dayton
Saturday, March 16, 2002, 6:18:20 AM, you wrote:
FS I wonder if anyone of you
Nice photos both, Bruce. I recall admiring them when those PUGs came
out.
Joe
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Joe,
Thanks. I hope that they illustrate the properties of the fisheye
zoom lens well.
Bruce
Saturday, March 16, 2002, 1:03:27 PM, you wrote:
JT Nice photos both, Bruce. I recall admiring them when those PUGs came
JT out.
JT Joe
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List
- Original Message -
From: Mark Cassino
Subject: Re: Pentax fisheye zoom (was: Still more wide-angle
questions)
I thought this one was in the PUG but I don't find it in my
listing. From
my website:
http://www.markcassino.com/feature/0101f.htm
Hi Mark; Its at:
http
: Mark Cassino
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, June 10, 2001 12:04 AM
Subject: Re: Filters for the SMCP-F Fisheye Zoom 17mm-28mm f/3.5-4.5
You can't use filters at all with the 17-28mm fisheye zoom. the front has a little build in hood and no facility to attach a filter, there is no rear filter
1:18 AM
Subject: Re: Filters for the SMCP-F Fisheye Zoom 17mm-28mm f/3.5-4.5
- Original Message -
From: Pål Jensen
Subject: Re: Filters for the SMCP-F Fisheye Zoom 17mm-28mm
f/3.5-4.5
Well you can tape filters in place :-)
Actually on closer inspection what looks like filter
: Saturday, June 09, 2001 11:13
PM
Subject: Filters for the SMCP-F Fisheye
Zoom 17mm-28mm f/3.5-4.5
I'm wanting to get a wide angle zoom for
landscapes and other such things and I came across these two lenses. The only
thing at the moment that is stopping me is I love to use
deal for a zoom?
I was just wondering about the SMCP-F
Fisheye Zoom 17mm-28mm f/3.5-4.5 and if there is filters that are
made for this lens. I am pretty sure that it has no internel filters but
perhaps small filters to attach to the back maybe? If any one who owns
this lens or who is familiar
You can't use filters at all with the 17-28mm fisheye zoom.
the front has a little build in hood and no facility to attach a filter,
there is no rear filter holder either. It's still a fun lens.
- MCC
At 03:13 PM 6/9/01 -0600, you wrote:
I was just
wondering about the SMCP-F Fisheye Zoom 17mm
Zoom 17mm-28mm f/3.5-4.5
You can't use filters at all with the 17-28mm
fisheye zoom. the front has a little build in hood and no facility to attach a
filter, there is no rear filter holder either. It's still a fun
lens.- MCCAt 03:13 PM 6/9/01 -0600, you
wrote:
I was just wondering about
- Original Message -
From: Pål Jensen
Subject: Re: Filters for the SMCP-F Fisheye Zoom 17mm-28mm
f/3.5-4.5
Well you can tape filters in place :-)
Actually on closer inspection what looks like filter threads
aren't...
How big is the rear element on that lens? The reason why I ask
os
one sweet lens.
Bruce Dayton
Sacramento, CA
- Original Message -
From: Ed Dombek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 27, 2001 6:12 AM
Subject: Experience w/ SMCP-F Fisheye Zoom 17mm-28mm f/3.5-4.5
I was playing around with this lens
Ed Dombek wrote:
I was playing around with this lens yesterday at a local shop and am seriously
considering purchasing it. Can anyone relate their expeience with it? I could save
a whole bunch of money and go with the Sigma or Phoenix but haven't ever used third
party lenses. Comments?
This zoom distorts thru all the range? I thought it went from fisheye distortion
at 17mm thru (almost at least) rectilinear 28mm.
I also thought a lot in this zoom, but recently I bought a K 17 mm 4, and I
already have a 20mm Tak and an A 28mm 2.8, so I think I don't need it. And it's
not
69 matches
Mail list logo
