On Sat, 2013-10-19 at 01:28 +0200, Johannes Schlüter wrote:
The thing about version numbers has been decided 5 years ago but
never was implemented. I think Steph Fox was the driver, but don't
remember the details and don't find the thread.
My estimate of 5 years wasn't too bad, 5 years 6
On Sat, Oct 19, 2013 at 11:42 AM, Johannes Schlüter
johan...@schlueters.de wrote:
On Sat, 2013-10-19 at 01:28 +0200, Johannes Schlüter wrote:
The thing about version numbers has been decided 5 years ago but
never was implemented. I think Steph Fox was the driver, but don't
remember the details
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 9:53 PM, Remi Collet r...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Le 18/10/2013 02:23, Christopher Jones a écrit :
On 10/14/2013 04:34 AM, Anatol Belski wrote:
Hi,
there are two improvements just implemented to the PECL website.
I
Every package is required to have LICENSE or
Le 18/10/2013 08:13, Hannes Magnusson a écrit :
Am I understanding this correctly... If I don't care for Windows, and
don't include a LICENSE file, then the peclweb package upload will
still tell me to bug off and reject the package?
Worst Idea Ever.
This problem affects all downstream
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 12:22 AM, Remi Collet r...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Le 18/10/2013 08:13, Hannes Magnusson a écrit :
Am I understanding this correctly... If I don't care for Windows, and
don't include a LICENSE file, then the peclweb package upload will
still tell me to bug off and
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 9:06 PM, Hannes Magnusson
hannes.magnus...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 12:22 AM, Remi Collet r...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Le 18/10/2013 08:13, Hannes Magnusson a écrit :
Am I understanding this correctly... If I don't care for Windows, and
don't include a
On Fri, 2013-10-18 at 13:55 -0700, Hannes Magnusson wrote:
And its _awesome_. Its great that we finally can provide Windows
binaries and it just happens.
What is not great is if that addition rejects otherwise valid packages
and forces 300+ packages to change something to be able to create
On 10/14/2013 04:34 AM, Anatol Belski wrote:
Hi,
there are two improvements just implemented to the PECL website.
I
Every package is required to have LICENSE or COPYING to be present in
the root of the package. The goal is to enforce the conformance with at
least PHP and BSD licenses. Where
Le 18/10/2013 02:23, Christopher Jones a écrit :
On 10/14/2013 04:34 AM, Anatol Belski wrote:
Hi,
there are two improvements just implemented to the PECL website.
I
Every package is required to have LICENSE or COPYING to be present in
the root of the package. The goal is to enforce
hi Chris,
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 5:23 PM, Christopher Jones
christopher.jo...@oracle.com wrote:
This change just blocked me from releasing OCI8 on PECL. OCI8 has
traditionally had the license information
(http://www.php.net/license/3_01.txt) mentioned appropriately in the
source code and
Hi,
there are two improvements just implemented to the PECL website.
I
Every package is required to have LICENSE or COPYING to be present in
the root of the package. The goal is to enforce the conformance with at
least PHP and BSD licenses. Where by no explicit check for exact license
type is
Hi Johannes,
On Mon, 2013-10-14 at 13:54 +0200, Johannes Schlüter wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, 2013-10-14 at 13:34 +0200, Anatol Belski wrote:
I'm going to walk through the extensions and fix this definitions in the
next days, but if you'll need to release before it's done, please fix it
12 matches
Mail list logo
