commit 7167db27cf3982f1bca6a4c600acc45975220ba4
Author: Emmanuel Seyman emman...@seyman.fr
Date: Sun Jan 4 22:33:22 2015 +0100
Remove bundled Flash files since they are not used by the application
(#1000245)
Add webdot directory perms to httpd configuration (#1070979)
bugzilla-httpd
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1000256
Bug 1000256 depends on bug 1092015, which changed state.
Bug 1092015 Summary: mojomojo-1.10-2.fc21 FTBFS
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1092015
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1000256
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1000256
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
mojomojo-1.10-3.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1000256
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1000256
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
mojomojo-1.10-3.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mojomojo-1.10-3.fc20
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1000256
--- Comment #1 from Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com ---
swfupload can easily be removed, but I'm unable to rebuild at the minute due to
a change in perl-Encode that is causing test failures.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1000256
Bug ID: 1000256
Summary: mojomojo contains bundled Flash files
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: mojomojo
Assignee: iarn...@gmail.com
Reporter: tchollingswo
Subject: Re: Bundled Flash
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 09:09:09AM +0200, Johan De Taeye wrote:
T.C.,
Please remove this prohibited content from your packages, or ensure
that any included .swf files are built from source using a free
software toolchain like `swfc` during the %build phase.
The single
Hollingsworth tchollingswo...@gmail.com写道：
remi wordpress
What? Can you ensure it can work properly?
Thanks.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
...@fedoraproject.org;
swftools-ow...@fedoraproject.org; texlive-ow...@fedoraproject.org;
tinymce-ow...@fedoraproject.org; wordpress-ow...@fedoraproject.org;
wt-ow...@fedoraproject.org; wxpython-ow...@fedoraproject.org;
yourls-ow...@fedoraproject.org; zabbix-ow...@fedoraproject.org
Subject: Bundled
On 08/15/2013 02:45 PM, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote:
It's come to my attention that a number of packages contain Flash (.swf) files,
but absolutely none of them have BuildRequires on a free software Flash
toolchain, nor do any of them seem to be shipping the source for these files.
:-(
It has
It's come to my attention that a number of packages contain Flash (.swf) files,
but absolutely none of them have BuildRequires on a free software Flash
toolchain, nor do any of them seem to be shipping the source for these files.
:-(
It has never been permissible to included prebuilt files of
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 09:09:09AM +0200, Johan De Taeye wrote:
T.C.,
Please remove this prohibited content from your packages, or ensure that
any included .swf files are built from source using a free software
toolchain like `swfc` during the %build phase.
The single SWF file in the
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 3:45 PM, T.C. Hollingsworth
tchollingswo...@gmail.com wrote:
It's come to my attention that a number of packages contain Flash (.swf)
files,
but absolutely none of them have BuildRequires on a free software Flash
toolchain, nor do any of them seem to be shipping the
15 matches
Mail list logo
