On Fri, Feb 4, 2022 at 11:09 AM Sajid Ali Syed wrote:
> Hi PETSc-developers,
>
> Could the linear solver table (at
> https://petsc.org/main/overview/linear_solve_table/) be updated with
> information regarding direct solvers that work on mpiaijkokkos/kokkos (or
> mpiaijcusparse/cuda)
On Fri, Feb 4, 2022 at 11:35 AM Anton Popov wrote:
> Hi Satish,
>
> I just discovered that PETSc 3.16.4 fails to link against the latest AMD
> BLIS and LibFLAME libraries on a Linux box.
>
>
> ---
> You set a value for
Hi PETSc-developers,
Could the linear solver table (at
https://petsc.org/main/overview/linear_solve_table/) be updated with
information regarding direct solvers that work on mpiaijkokkos/kokkos (or
mpiaijcusparse/cuda) matrix/vector types?
The use case for this solver would be to repeatedly
Can you send the 3.9 log?
Thanks,
Matt
On Fri, Feb 4, 2022 at 12:00 PM Anton Popov wrote:
>
> On 04.02.22 17:39, Matthew Knepley wrote:
>
> On Fri, Feb 4, 2022 at 11:35 AM Anton Popov wrote:
>
>> Hi Satish,
>>
>> I just discovered that PETSc 3.16.4 fails to link against the latest AMD
On 04.02.22 17:39, Matthew Knepley wrote:
On Fri, Feb 4, 2022 at 11:35 AM Anton Popov wrote:
Hi Satish,
I just discovered that PETSc 3.16.4 fails to link against the
latest AMD
BLIS and LibFLAME libraries on a Linux box.
Hi all again,
Thanks again for your help and very quick replies. I managed to fix it at the
end – unfortunately I cannot exactly pin-point what went wrong as I was trying
different things until they worked – not very scientific of me xD. But the
steps were as follows, I am not sure if this
Please do
ldd -O /opt/amd/amd-libflame-3.1.0/lib/lp64/libflame.so
You may need to list the gfortran library directory of libgfortran.so.5 it
needs to use in LDFLAGS passed to PETSc configure
Barry
Note: Even though you explicitly listed a static library of libflame to use our
> On Feb 4, 2022, at 12:27 PM, Satish Balay wrote:
>
> Probably best if you can use the same version of gfortran to build both petsc
> and libflame/blis
>
>> /usr/bin/ld: warning: libgfortran.so.5, needed by
>> /opt/amd/amd-libflame-3.1.0/lib/lp64/libflame.so, not found (try using
>>
Thanks Matt, Barry and Satish, for your suggestions.
The problem was indeed in mismatch between the gfortran library version
(system has libgfortran.so.4 libflame needs libgfortran.so.5)
3.9.4 did not detect this during configure, but only gave error later
during test.
3.16.4 detected
On Fri, 4 Feb 2022, Anton Popov wrote:
> Thanks Matt, Barry and Satish, for your suggestions.
>
> The problem was indeed in mismatch between the gfortran library version
> (system has libgfortran.so.4 libflame needs libgfortran.so.5)
>
> 3.9.4 did not detect this during configure, but only
Probably best if you can use the same version of gfortran to build both petsc
and libflame/blis
> /usr/bin/ld: warning: libgfortran.so.5, needed by
> /opt/amd/amd-libflame-3.1.0/lib/lp64/libflame.so, not found (try using -rpath
> or -rpath-link):
This is probably an ignore-able warning - but
> On Feb 4, 2022, at 12:38 PM, Satish Balay wrote:
>
> On Fri, 4 Feb 2022, Barry Smith wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>> On Feb 4, 2022, at 12:27 PM, Satish Balay wrote:
>>>
>>> Probably best if you can use the same version of gfortran to build both
>>> petsc and libflame/blis
>>>
/usr/bin/ld:
On Fri, 4 Feb 2022, Barry Smith wrote:
>
>
> > On Feb 4, 2022, at 12:27 PM, Satish Balay wrote:
> >
> > Probably best if you can use the same version of gfortran to build both
> > petsc and libflame/blis
> >
> >> /usr/bin/ld: warning: libgfortran.so.5, needed by
> >>
On Fri, 4 Feb 2022, Barry Smith wrote:
>
>
> > On Feb 4, 2022, at 12:38 PM, Satish Balay wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 4 Feb 2022, Barry Smith wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >>> On Feb 4, 2022, at 12:27 PM, Satish Balay wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Probably best if you can use the same version of gfortran to
Hi,
I have a very basic question about matrix preallocation. I am trying to use
the MatCreate(), MatSetFromOptions(), MatSetPreallocation() paradigm. I
thought that I should use the MatXAIJSetPreallocation() routine since the
code may be run with a SeqAIJ or MPIAIJ matrix but I do not
Am 04.02.2022 um 18:54 schrieb Satish Balay:
On Fri, 4 Feb 2022, Anton Popov wrote:
Thanks Matt, Barry and Satish, for your suggestions.
The problem was indeed in mismatch between the gfortran library version
(system has libgfortran.so.4 libflame needs libgfortran.so.5)
3.9.4 did not
On Fri, 4 Feb 2022, Anton Popov wrote:
>
> Am 04.02.2022 um 18:54 schrieb Satish Balay:
> > On Fri, 4 Feb 2022, Anton Popov wrote:
> >
> >> Thanks Matt, Barry and Satish, for your suggestions.
> >>
> >> The problem was indeed in mismatch between the gfortran library version
> >> (system has
17 matches
Mail list logo