for transformFkeyCheckAttrs() also didn't mention
unique indexes, so fix that too. In passing make that header comment
reflect reality in the various other aspects where it deviated from it.
Bug: 18295
Reported-by: Gilles PARC
Author: Laurenz Albe, David Rowley
Discussion:
https://www.postgresql.org
for transformFkeyCheckAttrs() also didn't mention
unique indexes, so fix that too. In passing make that header comment
reflect reality in the various other aspects where it deviated from it.
Bug: 18295
Reported-by: Gilles PARC
Author: Laurenz Albe, David Rowley
Discussion:
https://www.postgresql.org
Attempt to fix newly added Memoize regression test
Both drongo and fairywren seem not to like a new regression test added
by 2cca95e17. These machines show a different number of actual rows in
the EXPLAIN ANALYZE output. Since the number of actual rows is divided by
the number of loops, I
duplicates. This
isn't a problem for correctness, all it means is that the cache lookups
will be suboptimal due to having redundant work to do on every hash table
lookup and insert.
Here we adjust paraminfo_get_equal_hashops() to look for duplicates and
ignore them when we find them.
Author: David
der of operations so that we create NestLoopParam
for the lateral references first before doing replace_nestloop_params().
replace_nestloop_params() will find and reuse the existing NestLoopParam
in cases where the Var exists in both locations.
Author: Richard Guo
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane, David Row
equivalence with the
original query.
Author: David Rowley, Richard Guo, Andy Fan
Reviewed-by: Richard Guo, David Rowley
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/caaphdvqg6xzdhyrpz0zgocevsmo0d3vxa9dvhrztkfqo30w...@mail.gmail.com
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17540-7aa1855ad5ec18b4%40postgresql.org
Branch
Re-disallow Memoize for parameterized nested loops with join filters
This was previously fixed in 9e215378d but got broken again as a result
of 2489d76c4. It seems that commit causes ppi_clauses to contain
duplicate clauses and it's no longer safe to check the list_length of
that list to
Re-disallow Memoize for parameterized nested loops with join filters
This was previously fixed in 9e215378d but got broken again as a result
of 2489d76c4. It seems that commit causes ppi_clauses to contain
duplicate clauses and it's no longer safe to check the list_length of
that list to
Fix broken Bitmapset optimization in DiscreteKnapsack()
Some code in DiscreteKnapsack() attempted to zero all words in a
Bitmapset by performing bms_del_members() to delete all the members from
itself before replacing those members with members from another set.
When that code was written, this
r bms_join(). I also removed some
low-value comments that were trying to convey information about "these
operations" without mentioning which operations it was talking about.
It seems better to document these things in the function header comment
instead.
Author: Richard Guo, David Rowle
Fix use of incorrect TupleTableSlot in DISTINCT aggregates
1349d2790 added code to allow DISTINCT and ORDER BY aggregates to work
more efficiently by using presorted input. That commit added some code
that made use of the AggState's tmpcontext and adjusted the
ecxt_outertuple and ecxt_innertuple
Fix use of incorrect TupleTableSlot in DISTINCT aggregates
1349d2790 added code to allow DISTINCT and ORDER BY aggregates to work
more efficiently by using presorted input. That commit added some code
that made use of the AggState's tmpcontext and adjusted the
ecxt_outertuple and ecxt_innertuple
Verify that attribute counts match in ExecCopySlot
tts_virtual_copyslot() contained an Assert that checked that the srcslot
contained <= attributes than the dstslot. This seems to be backwards as
if the srcslot contained fewer attributes then the dstslot could be left
with stale Datum values
Don't use bms_membership() in cases where we don't need to
00b41463c adjusted Bitmapset so that an empty set is always represented
as NULL. This makes checking for empty sets far cheaper than it used
to be.
There were various places in the code where we'd call bms_membership()
to handle the 3
Ensure we use the correct spelling of "ensure"
We seem to have accidentally used "insure" in a few places. Correct
that.
Author: Peter Smith
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/CAHut+Pv0biqrhA3pMhu40aDsj343mTsD75khKnHsLqR8P04f=q...@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 12, oldest supported version
Ensure we use the correct spelling of "ensure"
We seem to have accidentally used "insure" in a few places. Correct
that.
Author: Peter Smith
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/CAHut+Pv0biqrhA3pMhu40aDsj343mTsD75khKnHsLqR8P04f=q...@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 12, oldest supported version
Ensure we use the correct spelling of "ensure"
We seem to have accidentally used "insure" in a few places. Correct
that.
Author: Peter Smith
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/CAHut+Pv0biqrhA3pMhu40aDsj343mTsD75khKnHsLqR8P04f=q...@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 12, oldest supported version
Ensure we use the correct spelling of "ensure"
We seem to have accidentally used "insure" in a few places. Correct
that.
Author: Peter Smith
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/CAHut+Pv0biqrhA3pMhu40aDsj343mTsD75khKnHsLqR8P04f=q...@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 12, oldest supported version
Ensure we use the correct spelling of "ensure"
We seem to have accidentally used "insure" in a few places. Correct
that.
Author: Peter Smith
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/CAHut+Pv0biqrhA3pMhu40aDsj343mTsD75khKnHsLqR8P04f=q...@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 12, oldest supported version
Ensure we use the correct spelling of "ensure"
We seem to have accidentally used "insure" in a few places. Correct
that.
Author: Peter Smith
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/CAHut+Pv0biqrhA3pMhu40aDsj343mTsD75khKnHsLqR8P04f=q...@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 12, oldest supported version
Make use of initReadOnlyStringInfo() in more places
f0efa5aec introduced the concept of "read-only" StringInfos which makes
use of an existing, possibly not NUL terminated, buffer.
Here we adjust two places that make use of StringInfos to receive data
to avoid using appendBinaryStringInfo() in
Try again to fix the MSVC build
My last attempt in 39c959ef2 mistakenly conditionally added the missing
file based on some unrelated condition.
Reported-by: Thomas Munro
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/CA+hUKGLovvAXim9Fytn=jxks9s=JhP5=8oyy0cbxgg-ggal...@mail.gmail.com
Branch
--
master
Add missing unicode_category.c to MSVC build scripts
Fixes MSVC build failure introduced by a02b37fc0
Branch
--
master
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/39c959ef25bd9cdd966ee024ab14f8f4214bb276
Modified Files
--
src/tools/msvc/Mkvcbuild.pm | 1 +
1 file
Stabilize postgres_fdw tests on 32-bit machines
cac169d68 adjusted DEFAULT_FDW_TUPLE_COST and that seems to have caused
a test to become unstable on 32-bit machines.
4b14e1871 tried to fix this as originally the plan was flipping between
a Nested Loop and Hash Join. That commit forced the
Attempt to stabilize postgres_fdw tests
cac169d68 adjusted DEFAULT_FDW_TUPLE_COST and that seems to have caused
a test to become unstable on 32-bit machines. Try to make it stable
again.
Reported-by: Michael Paquier
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zum2iha8x2lrg...@paquier.xyz
Branch
--
Increase DEFAULT_FDW_TUPLE_COST from 0.01 to 0.2
0.01 was unrealistically low as it's the same as the default
cpu_tuple_cost and 10x cheaper than the default parallel_tuple_cost.
It's hard to imagine a situation where fetching a tuple from a foreign
server would be cheaper than fetching one from
Adjust the order of the prechecks in pgrowlocks()
4b8266415 added a precheck to pgrowlocks() to ensure the given object's
pg_class.relam is HEAP_TABLE_AM_OID, however, that check was put before
another check which was checking if the given object was a partitioned
table. Since the pg_class.relam
Adjust the order of the prechecks in pgrowlocks()
4b8266415 added a precheck to pgrowlocks() to ensure the given object's
pg_class.relam is HEAP_TABLE_AM_OID, however, that check was put before
another check which was checking if the given object was a partitioned
table. Since the pg_class.relam
Adjust the order of the prechecks in pgrowlocks()
4b8266415 added a precheck to pgrowlocks() to ensure the given object's
pg_class.relam is HEAP_TABLE_AM_OID, however, that check was put before
another check which was checking if the given object was a partitioned
table. Since the pg_class.relam
Adjust the order of the prechecks in pgrowlocks()
4b8266415 added a precheck to pgrowlocks() to ensure the given object's
pg_class.relam is HEAP_TABLE_AM_OID, however, that check was put before
another check which was checking if the given object was a partitioned
table. Since the pg_class.relam
Adjust the order of the prechecks in pgrowlocks()
4b8266415 added a precheck to pgrowlocks() to ensure the given object's
pg_class.relam is HEAP_TABLE_AM_OID, however, that check was put before
another check which was checking if the given object was a partitioned
table. Since the pg_class.relam
Adjust the order of the prechecks in pgrowlocks()
4b8266415 added a precheck to pgrowlocks() to ensure the given object's
pg_class.relam is HEAP_TABLE_AM_OID, however, that check was put before
another check which was checking if the given object was a partitioned
table. Since the pg_class.relam
queries.
Author: David Rowley
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/CAApHDvr%3De-YOigriSHHm324a40HPqcUhSp6pWWgjz5WwegR%3DcQ%40mail.gmail.com
Branch
--
master
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/0c882a298881056176a27ccc44c5c3bb7c8f308c
Modified Files
--
src/backend
On Thu, 26 Oct 2023 at 15:59, Amit Langote wrote:
> src/backend/optimizer/util/inherit.c | 9 ++---
Hi Amit,
I'm getting an unused variable warning from this with non-assert builds:
[697/1908] Compiling C object
src/backend/postgres_lib.a.p/optimizer_util_inherit.c.o
a mention in the release notes that a UDT's receive function mustn't rely
on the input StringInfo being NUL terminated.
Author: David Rowley
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/CAApHDvorfO3iBZ%3DxpiZvp3uHtJVLyFaPBSvcAhAq2HPLnaNSwQ%40mail.gmail.com
Branch
--
master
Details
---
On Wed, 25 Oct 2023 at 22:59, Alexander Korotkov
wrote:
> src/test/regress/sql/join.sql | 359
There seems to be a few EXPLAINs added here that didn't include costs off.
David
Add missing include dir and references to libpq for MSVC build
66d6086cb adjusted pg_regress to require this but forgot to adjust the
Visual Studio build script.
Branch
--
master
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/673a17e31202cc47a9309e9b0b9b5fbec36080d3
Modified
Fix runtime partition pruning for HASH partitioned tables
This could only affect HASH partitioned tables with at least 2 partition
key columns.
If partition pruning was delayed until execution and the query contained
an IS NULL qual on one of the partitioned keys, and some subsequent
partitioned
Fix runtime partition pruning for HASH partitioned tables
This could only affect HASH partitioned tables with at least 2 partition
key columns.
If partition pruning was delayed until execution and the query contained
an IS NULL qual on one of the partitioned keys, and some subsequent
partitioned
Fix runtime partition pruning for HASH partitioned tables
This could only affect HASH partitioned tables with at least 2 partition
key columns.
If partition pruning was delayed until execution and the query contained
an IS NULL qual on one of the partitioned keys, and some subsequent
partitioned
Fix runtime partition pruning for HASH partitioned tables
This could only affect HASH partitioned tables with at least 2 partition
key columns.
If partition pruning was delayed until execution and the query contained
an IS NULL qual on one of the partitioned keys, and some subsequent
partitioned
Fix runtime partition pruning for HASH partitioned tables
This could only affect HASH partitioned tables with at least 2 partition
key columns.
If partition pruning was delayed until execution and the query contained
an IS NULL qual on one of the partitioned keys, and some subsequent
partitioned
Fix runtime partition pruning for HASH partitioned tables
This could only affect HASH partitioned tables with at least 2 partition
key columns.
If partition pruning was delayed until execution and the query contained
an IS NULL qual on one of the partitioned keys, and some subsequent
partitioned
Fix runtime partition pruning for HASH partitioned tables
This could only affect HASH partitioned tables with at least 2 partition
key columns.
If partition pruning was delayed until execution and the query contained
an IS NULL qual on one of the partitioned keys, and some subsequent
partitioned
Doc: fix grammatical errors for enable_partitionwise_aggregate
Author: Andrew Atkinson
Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Bapat
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/CAG6XLEnC%3DEgq0YHRic2kWWDs4xwQnQ_kBA6qhhzAq1-pO_9Tfw%40mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 11, where enable_partitionwise_aggregate was added
Branch
Doc: fix grammatical errors for enable_partitionwise_aggregate
Author: Andrew Atkinson
Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Bapat
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/CAG6XLEnC%3DEgq0YHRic2kWWDs4xwQnQ_kBA6qhhzAq1-pO_9Tfw%40mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 11, where enable_partitionwise_aggregate was added
Branch
Doc: fix grammatical errors for enable_partitionwise_aggregate
Author: Andrew Atkinson
Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Bapat
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/CAG6XLEnC%3DEgq0YHRic2kWWDs4xwQnQ_kBA6qhhzAq1-pO_9Tfw%40mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 11, where enable_partitionwise_aggregate was added
Branch
Doc: fix grammatical errors for enable_partitionwise_aggregate
Author: Andrew Atkinson
Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Bapat
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/CAG6XLEnC%3DEgq0YHRic2kWWDs4xwQnQ_kBA6qhhzAq1-pO_9Tfw%40mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 11, where enable_partitionwise_aggregate was added
Branch
Doc: fix grammatical errors for enable_partitionwise_aggregate
Author: Andrew Atkinson
Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Bapat
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/CAG6XLEnC%3DEgq0YHRic2kWWDs4xwQnQ_kBA6qhhzAq1-pO_9Tfw%40mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 11, where enable_partitionwise_aggregate was added
Branch
Doc: fix grammatical errors for enable_partitionwise_aggregate
Author: Andrew Atkinson
Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Bapat
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/CAG6XLEnC%3DEgq0YHRic2kWWDs4xwQnQ_kBA6qhhzAq1-pO_9Tfw%40mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 11, where enable_partitionwise_aggregate was added
Branch
Doc: fix grammatical errors for enable_partitionwise_aggregate
Author: Andrew Atkinson
Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Bapat
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/CAG6XLEnC%3DEgq0YHRic2kWWDs4xwQnQ_kBA6qhhzAq1-pO_9Tfw%40mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 11, where enable_partitionwise_aggregate was added
Branch
Fix incorrect step generation in HASH partition pruning
get_steps_using_prefix_recurse() incorrectly assumed that it could stop
recursive processing of the 'prefix' list when cur_keyno was one before
the step_lastkeyno. Since hash partition pruning can prune using IS
NULL quals, and these IS
Fix incorrect step generation in HASH partition pruning
get_steps_using_prefix_recurse() incorrectly assumed that it could stop
recursive processing of the 'prefix' list when cur_keyno was one before
the step_lastkeyno. Since hash partition pruning can prune using IS
NULL quals, and these IS
Fix incorrect step generation in HASH partition pruning
get_steps_using_prefix_recurse() incorrectly assumed that it could stop
recursive processing of the 'prefix' list when cur_keyno was one before
the step_lastkeyno. Since hash partition pruning can prune using IS
NULL quals, and these IS
Fix incorrect step generation in HASH partition pruning
get_steps_using_prefix_recurse() incorrectly assumed that it could stop
recursive processing of the 'prefix' list when cur_keyno was one before
the step_lastkeyno. Since hash partition pruning can prune using IS
NULL quals, and these IS
Fix incorrect step generation in HASH partition pruning
get_steps_using_prefix_recurse() incorrectly assumed that it could stop
recursive processing of the 'prefix' list when cur_keyno was one before
the step_lastkeyno. Since hash partition pruning can prune using IS
NULL quals, and these IS
Fix incorrect step generation in HASH partition pruning
get_steps_using_prefix_recurse() incorrectly assumed that it could stop
recursive processing of the 'prefix' list when cur_keyno was one before
the step_lastkeyno. Since hash partition pruning can prune using IS
NULL quals, and these IS
Fix incorrect step generation in HASH partition pruning
get_steps_using_prefix_recurse() incorrectly assumed that it could stop
recursive processing of the 'prefix' list when cur_keyno was one before
the step_lastkeyno. Since hash partition pruning can prune using IS
NULL quals, and these IS
Fix possible crash in add_paths_to_append_rel()
While working on a8a968a82, I failed to consider that
cheapest_startup_path can be NULL when there is no non-parameterized
path in the pathlist. This is well documented in set_cheapest(), I just
failed to notice.
Here we adjust the code to just
Revert "Optimize various aggregate deserialization functions"
This reverts commit 608fd198def5390c3490bfe903730207dfd8eeb4.
On 2nd thoughts, the StringInfo API requires that strings are NUL
terminated and pointing directly to the data in a bytea Datum isn't NUL
terminated.
Discussion:
Optimize various aggregate deserialization functions
The serialized representation of an internal aggregate state is a bytea
value. In each deserial function, in order to "receive" the bytea value
we appended it onto a short-lived StringInfoData using
appendBinaryStringInfo. This was a little
Strip off ORDER BY/DISTINCT aggregate pathkeys in create_agg_path
1349d2790 added code to adjust the PlannerInfo.group_pathkeys so that
ORDER BY / DISTINCT aggregate functions could obtain pre-sorted inputs
to allow faster execution. That commit forgot to adjust the pathkeys in
Strip off ORDER BY/DISTINCT aggregate pathkeys in create_agg_path
1349d2790 added code to adjust the PlannerInfo.group_pathkeys so that
ORDER BY / DISTINCT aggregate functions could obtain pre-sorted inputs
to allow faster execution. That commit forgot to adjust the pathkeys in
Remove debug_print_rel and replace usages with pprint
Going by c4a1933b4, b33ef397a and 05893712c (to name just a few), it seems
that maintaining debug_print_rel() is often forgotten. In the case of
c4a1933b4, it was several years before anyone noticed that a path type
was not handled by
from each of the child relations
when the append rel has "consider_startup" set.
Author: Andy Fan, David Rowley
Discussion:
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAKU4AWrXSkUV=Pt-gRxQT7EbfUeNssprGyNsB=5mjibfz6s...@mail.gmail.com
Branch
--
master
Details
---
https://git.postgre
Fix memory leak in Memoize code
Ensure we switch to the per-tuple memory context to prevent any memory
leaks of detoasted Datums in MemoizeHash_hash() and MemoizeHash_equal().
Reported-by: Orlov Aleksej
Author: Orlov Aleksej, David Rowley
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m
Fix memory leak in Memoize code
Ensure we switch to the per-tuple memory context to prevent any memory
leaks of detoasted Datums in MemoizeHash_hash() and MemoizeHash_equal().
Reported-by: Orlov Aleksej
Author: Orlov Aleksej, David Rowley
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m
Fix memory leak in Memoize code
Ensure we switch to the per-tuple memory context to prevent any memory
leaks of detoasted Datums in MemoizeHash_hash() and MemoizeHash_equal().
Reported-by: Orlov Aleksej
Author: Orlov Aleksej, David Rowley
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m
Fix memory leak in Memoize code
Ensure we switch to the per-tuple memory context to prevent any memory
leaks of detoasted Datums in MemoizeHash_hash() and MemoizeHash_equal().
Reported-by: Orlov Aleksej
Author: Orlov Aleksej, David Rowley
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m
Tidy-up some appendStringInfo*() usages
Make a few newish calls to appendStringInfo() which have no special
formatting use appendStringInfoString() instead. Also, adjust usages of
appendStringInfoString() which only append a string containing a single
character to make use of
and still fall through and raise an
ERROR.
Author: Ranier Vilela
Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Bapat, David Rowley
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/CAEudQArQSghBu2gLojg4o_tnHj_x2HcS%3D%2BwewL3NJS8z0VnK%2Bg%40mail.gmail.com
Branch
--
master
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/
Add missing TidRangePath handling in print_path()
Tid Range scans were added back in bb437f995. That commit forgot to add
handling for TidRangePaths in print_path().
Only people building with OPTIMIZER_DEBUG might have noticed this, which
likely is the reason it's taken 4 years for anyone to
Add missing TidRangePath handling in print_path()
Tid Range scans were added back in bb437f995. That commit forgot to add
handling for TidRangePaths in print_path().
Only people building with OPTIMIZER_DEBUG might have noticed this, which
likely is the reason it's taken 4 years for anyone to
Add missing TidRangePath handling in print_path()
Tid Range scans were added back in bb437f995. That commit forgot to add
handling for TidRangePaths in print_path().
Only people building with OPTIMIZER_DEBUG might have noticed this, which
likely is the reason it's taken 4 years for anyone to
Add missing TidRangePath handling in print_path()
Tid Range scans were added back in bb437f995. That commit forgot to add
handling for TidRangePaths in print_path().
Only people building with OPTIMIZER_DEBUG might have noticed this, which
likely is the reason it's taken 4 years for anyone to
could become this lack of escaping as VACUUM cannot be
specified in a multi-command string.
Reported-by: Ryoga Yoshida
Author: Ryoga Yoshida, David Rowley
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/08930c0b541700a5264e5fbf3a685f5a%40oss.nttdata.com
Backpatch-through: 16, where ae78cae3b was introduced.
Branch
could become this lack of escaping as VACUUM cannot be
specified in a multi-command string.
Reported-by: Ryoga Yoshida
Author: Ryoga Yoshida, David Rowley
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/08930c0b541700a5264e5fbf3a685f5a%40oss.nttdata.com
Backpatch-through: 16, where ae78cae3b was introduced.
Branch
Fix incorrect logic in plan dependency recording
Both 50e17ad28 and 29f45e299 mistakenly tried to record a plan dependency
on a function but mistakenly inverted the OidIsValid test. This meant
that we'd record a dependency only when the function's Oid was
InvalidOid. Clearly this was meant to
Fix incorrect logic in plan dependency recording
Both 50e17ad28 and 29f45e299 mistakenly tried to record a plan dependency
on a function but mistakenly inverted the OidIsValid test. This meant
that we'd record a dependency only when the function's Oid was
InvalidOid. Clearly this was meant to
Fix incorrect logic in plan dependency recording
Both 50e17ad28 and 29f45e299 mistakenly tried to record a plan dependency
on a function but mistakenly inverted the OidIsValid test. This meant
that we'd record a dependency only when the function's Oid was
InvalidOid. Clearly this was meant to
Fix incorrect logic in plan dependency recording
Both 50e17ad28 and 29f45e299 mistakenly tried to record a plan dependency
on a function but mistakenly inverted the OidIsValid test. This meant
that we'd record a dependency only when the function's Oid was
InvalidOid. Clearly this was meant to
Meson: check for pg_config_paths.h left over from make
The meson build scripts attempt to find files left over from configure
and fail, mentioning that "make maintainer-clean" should be run to remove
these. This seems to have been done for files generated from configure.
pg_config_paths.h is
Meson: check for pg_config_paths.h left over from make
The meson build scripts attempt to find files left over from configure
and fail, mentioning that "make maintainer-clean" should be run to remove
these. This seems to have been done for files generated from configure.
pg_config_paths.h is
On Thu, 24 Aug 2023 at 02:50, Nathan Bossart wrote:
>
> Add to_bin() and to_oct().
src/include/catalog/pg_proc.dat | 12 +
Did this maybe miss a catversion bump?
David
On Tue, 8 Aug 2023 at 10:06, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> David Rowley writes:
> > * https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Committing_checklist
>
> I thought we had something written down there after the last
> discussion of this point, but maybe it was hanging fire because
> we
On Tue, 8 Aug 2023 at 01:02, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> David Rowley writes:
> > Don't Memoize lateral joins with volatile join conditions
>
> Is this really something to be pushing into stable branches less than
> 12 hours before a release wrap? We don't normally take such
Don't Memoize lateral joins with volatile join conditions
The use of Memoize was already disabled in normal joins when the join
conditions had volatile functions per the code in
match_opclause_to_indexcol(). Ordinarily, the parameterization for the
inner side of a nested loop will be an Index
Don't Memoize lateral joins with volatile join conditions
The use of Memoize was already disabled in normal joins when the join
conditions had volatile functions per the code in
match_opclause_to_indexcol(). Ordinarily, the parameterization for the
inner side of a nested loop will be an Index
Don't Memoize lateral joins with volatile join conditions
The use of Memoize was already disabled in normal joins when the join
conditions had volatile functions per the code in
match_opclause_to_indexcol(). Ordinarily, the parameterization for the
inner side of a nested loop will be an Index
Don't Memoize lateral joins with volatile join conditions
The use of Memoize was already disabled in normal joins when the join
conditions had volatile functions per the code in
match_opclause_to_indexcol(). Ordinarily, the parameterization for the
inner side of a nested loop will be an Index
Fix misleading comment in paraminfo_get_equal_hashops
The comment mistakenly claimed the code was checking PlaceHolderVars for
volatile functions when the code was actually checking lateral vars.
Update the comment to reflect the reality of the code.
Author: Richard Guo
Discussion:
of for_each_from(). Ever since 1cff1b95a, Lists are arrays
under the hood. lnext() and list_head() both seem a little too linked-list
like.
Author: Alex Hsieh, David Rowley, Richard Guo
Reviewed-by: Julien Rouhaud
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/CANWNU8x9P9aCXGF%3DaT-A_8mLTAT0LkcZ_ySYrGbcuHzMQw2-1g
Attempt to stabilize new window agg regression test
This test was recently added in 3900a02c9. It appears to be unstable in
regards to the join order presumably due to the relations at either side
of the join being equal in side. Here we add a qual to make one of them
smaller so the planner is
Minor adjustments to WindowAgg startup cost code
This is a follow-on of 3900a02c9 containing some changes which I forgot
to commit locally before forming a patch with git format-patch.
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/caaphdvrb0s5bmv+0-wttqwfe-bj0nowqtndu9qqfjz2vspl...@mail.gmail.com
Branch
Palmer
Author: David Rowley
Reviewed-by: Andy Fan
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17862-1ab8f74b0f7b0...@postgresql.org
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/caaphdvrb0s5bmv+0-wttqwfe-bj0nowqtndu9qqfjz2vspl...@mail.gmail.com
Branch
--
master
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff
, octal and binary formats along with underscore
separators are now supported.
Author: Andres Freund, David Rowley
Reported-by: Masahiko Sawada
Reviewed-by: Dean Rasheed, John Naylor
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/CAD21AoDvDmUQeJtZrau1ovnT_smN940%3DKp6mszNGK3bq9yRN6g%40mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through
, octal and binary formats along with underscore
separators are now supported.
Author: Andres Freund, David Rowley
Reported-by: Masahiko Sawada
Reviewed-by: Dean Rasheed, John Naylor
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/CAD21AoDvDmUQeJtZrau1ovnT_smN940%3DKp6mszNGK3bq9yRN6g%40mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through
Fix overly strict Assert in jsonpath code
This was failing for queries which try to get the .type() of a
jpiLikeRegex. For example:
select jsonb_path_query('["string", "string"]',
'($[0] like_regex ".{7}").type()');
Reported-by: Alexander Kozhemyakin
Bug: #18035
Fix overly strict Assert in jsonpath code
This was failing for queries which try to get the .type() of a
jpiLikeRegex. For example:
select jsonb_path_query('["string", "string"]',
'($[0] like_regex ".{7}").type()');
Reported-by: Alexander Kozhemyakin
Bug: #18035
Fix overly strict Assert in jsonpath code
This was failing for queries which try to get the .type() of a
jpiLikeRegex. For example:
select jsonb_path_query('["string", "string"]',
'($[0] like_regex ".{7}").type()');
Reported-by: Alexander Kozhemyakin
Bug: #18035
101 - 200 of 753 matches
Mail list logo