Fix thinko in comments.
A slot can not be stored in a tuple but it's vice versa.
Reported-by: Ashutosh Bapat
Author: Ashutosh Bapat
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/cafjfprchhnhxdegyjv3kkdwrwo1_nb_kyzm_zsdemozal1a...@mail.gmail.com
Branch
--
master
Details
Don't consider parallel append for parallel unsafe paths.
Commit ab72716778 allowed Parallel Append paths to be generated for a
relation that is not parallel safe. Prevent that from happening.
Initial analysis by Tom Lane.
Reported-by: Rajkumar Raghuwanshi
Author: Amit Kapila and Rajkumar
Cosmetic improvements for faster column addition.
Changed the name of few structure members for the sake of clarity and
removed spurious whitespace.
Reported-by: Amit Kapila
Author: Amit Kapila, based on suggestion by Andrew Dunstan
Reviewed-by: Alvaro Herrera
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m
consistently.
Reported-by: Tom Lane
Author: Tom Lane
Reviewed-by: Amit Khandekar and Amit Kapila
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/32365.1528994...@sss.pgh.pa.us
Branch
--
master
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/98d476a965eefb52af53f4fb55dbfead0ede9282
Modified Files
-parallel query. Change the code so that worker backend
also starts tracking buffer usage after ExecutorStart.
Author: Amit Kapila and Robert Haas
Reviewed-by: Robert Haas and Andres Freund
Backpatch-through: 9.6 where this code was introduced
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/86137f17-1dfb-42f9-7421
it
completes the execution.
In the passing fix the gather node code to allow workers to shut down as
soon as we find that all the tuples from the workers have been retrieved.
The original code use to do that, but is accidently removed by commit
01edb5c7fc.
Reported-by: Adrien Nayrat
Author: Amit Kapila
it
completes the execution.
In the passing fix the gather node code to allow workers to shut down as
soon as we find that all the tuples from the workers have been retrieved.
The original code use to do that, but is accidently removed by commit
01edb5c7fc.
Reported-by: Adrien Nayrat
Author: Amit Kapila
it
completes the execution.
In the passing fix the gather node code to allow workers to shut down as
soon as we find that all the tuples from the workers have been retrieved.
The original code use to do that, but is accidently removed by commit
01edb5c7fc.
Reported-by: Adrien Nayrat
Author: Amit Kapila
it
completes the execution.
In the passing fix the gather node code to allow workers to shut down as
soon as we find that all the tuples from the workers have been retrieved.
The original code use to do that, but is accidently removed by commit
01edb5c7fc.
Reported-by: Adrien Nayrat
Author: Amit Kapila
-parallel query. Change the code so that worker backend
also starts tracking buffer usage after ExecutorStart.
Author: Amit Kapila and Robert Haas
Reviewed-by: Robert Haas and Andres Freund
Backpatch-through: 9.6 where this code was introduced
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/86137f17-1dfb-42f9-7421
-parallel query. Change the code so that worker backend
also starts tracking buffer usage after ExecutorStart.
Author: Amit Kapila and Robert Haas
Reviewed-by: Robert Haas and Andres Freund
Backpatch-through: 9.6 where this code was introduced
Discussion:https://postgr.es/m/86137f17-1dfb-42f9-7421
-parallel query. Change the code so that worker backend
also starts tracking buffer usage after ExecutorStart.
Author: Amit Kapila and Robert Haas
Reviewed-by: Robert Haas and Andres Freund
Backpatch-through: 9.6 where this code was introduced
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/86137f17-1dfb-42f9-7421
-by: Thomas Munro and Amit Kapila
Author: Amit Kapila
Reviewed-by: Thomas Munro
Tested-By: Thomas Munro and Victor Yegorov
Backpatch-through: 10 where parallel index scans were introduced
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/153228422922.1395.1746424054206154...@wrigleys.postgresql.org
Branch
-by: Thomas Munro and Amit Kapila
Author: Amit Kapila
Reviewed-by: Thomas Munro
Tested-By: Thomas Munro and Victor Yegorov
Backpatch-through: 10 where parallel index scans were introduced
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/153228422922.1395.1746424054206154...@wrigleys.postgresql.org
Branch
-by: Thomas Munro and Amit Kapila
Author: Amit Kapila
Reviewed-by: Thomas Munro
Tested-By: Thomas Munro and Victor Yegorov
Backpatch-through: 10 where parallel index scans were introduced
Discussion:https://postgr.es/m/153228422922.1395.1746424054206154...@wrigleys.postgresql.org
Branch
Adjust comment atop ExecShutdownNode.
After commits a315b967cc and b805b63ac2, part of the comment atop
ExecShutdownNode is redundant. Adjust it.
Author: Amit Kapila
Backpatch-through: 10 where both the mentioned commits are present.
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/86137f17-1dfb-42f9-7421
Adjust comment atop ExecShutdownNode.
After commits a315b967cc and b805b63ac2, part of the comment atop
ExecShutdownNode is redundant. Adjust it.
Author: Amit Kapila
Backpatch-through: 10 where both the mentioned commits are present.
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/86137f17-1dfb-42f9-7421
Adjust comment atop ExecShutdownNode.
After commits a315b967cc and b805b63ac2, part of the comment atop
ExecShutdownNode is redundant. Adjust it.
Author: Amit Kapila
Backpatch-through: 10 where both the mentioned commits are present.
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/86137f17-1dfb-42f9-7421
backward. Fix that by disallowing the shutting down of resources in such
cases.
Reported-by: Robert Haas
Analysed-by: Robert Haas and Amit Kapila
Author: Amit Kapila
Reviewed-by: Robert Haas
Backpatch-through: 9.6 where this code was introduced
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/86137f17-1dfb-42f9-7421
backward. Fix that by disallowing the shutting down of resources in such
cases.
Reported-by: Robert Haas
Analysed-by: Robert Haas and Amit Kapila
Author: Amit Kapila
Reviewed-by: Robert Haas
Backpatch-through: 9.6 where this code was introduced
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/86137f17-1dfb-42f9-7421
backward. Fix that by disallowing the shutting down of resources in such
cases.
Reported-by: Robert Haas
Analysed-by: Robert Haas and Amit Kapila
Author: Amit Kapila
Reviewed-by: Robert Haas
Backpatch-through: 9.6 where this code was introduced
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/86137f17-1dfb-42f9-7421
backward. Fix that by disallowing the shutting down of resources in such
cases.
Reported-by: Robert Haas
Analysed-by: Robert Haas and Amit Kapila
Author: Amit Kapila
Reviewed-by: Robert Haas
Backpatch-through: 9.6 where this code was introduced
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/86137f17-1dfb-42f9-7421
not to change the behavior in any case that
currently works, so there's really no reason for a HASH_VERSION bump.
Author: Dilip Kumar
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila
Backpatch-through: 10
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/caa4ek1ltf4vmu4mx_+i72ff1mdnz8xajmgkt2hv8+uswcn8...@mail.gmail.com
Branch
not to change the behavior in any case that
currently works, so there's really no reason for a HASH_VERSION bump.
Author: Dilip Kumar
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila
Backpatch-through: 10
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/caa4ek1ltf4vmu4mx_+i72ff1mdnz8xajmgkt2hv8+uswcn8...@mail.gmail.com
Branch
not to change the behavior in any case that
currently works, so there's really no reason for a HASH_VERSION bump.
Author: Dilip Kumar
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila
Backpatch-through: 10
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/caa4ek1ltf4vmu4mx_+i72ff1mdnz8xajmgkt2hv8+uswcn8...@mail.gmail.com
Branch
inary mode.
Author: Amit Kapila
Reviewed-by: Magnus Hagander
Backpatch-through: 11
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/caa4ek1+lonzod+h85fgmyjwzxky-xv1fyweyp-tky2wpd5c...@mail.gmail.com
Branch
--
REL_11_STABLE
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/762a16572bb5d9be6c9c53c9ecd292
inary mode.
Author: Amit Kapila
Reviewed-by: Magnus Hagander
Backpatch-through: 11
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/caa4ek1+lonzod+h85fgmyjwzxky-xv1fyweyp-tky2wpd5c...@mail.gmail.com
Branch
--
master
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/bb60f2cb6ed8361fbf18b92d312776046d9b0103
: Amit Khandekar, with minor changes by me
Reviewed-by: Dilip Kumar, Amit Kapila and Alvaro Herrera
Backpatch-through: 11
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/CAJ3gD9fRbEzDqdeDq1jxqZUb47kJn+tQ7=bcgjc8quqksdv...@mail.gmail.com
Branch
--
REL_11_STABLE
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg
: Amit Khandekar, with minor changes by me
Reviewed-by: Dilip Kumar, Amit Kapila and Alvaro Herrera
Backpatch-through: 11
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/CAJ3gD9fRbEzDqdeDq1jxqZUb47kJn+tQ7=bcgjc8quqksdv...@mail.gmail.com
Branch
--
master
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg
postmaster
startup.
Reported-by: Andres Freund
Author: Amit Kapila
Backpatch-through: 9.6
Discussion:https://postgr.es/m/20181027104138.qmbbelopvy7cw...@alap3.anarazel.de
Branch
--
REL_10_STABLE
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/d1a2fa3d9901c1e8f6bba1cecbb4ecdd64f4849e
that by initializing them
during postmaster startup.
Reported-by: Andres Freund
Author: Amit Kapila
Backpatch-through: 9.6
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/20181027104138.qmbbelopvy7cw...@alap3.anarazel.de
Branch
--
REL_11_STABLE
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff
that by initializing them
during postmaster startup.
Reported-by: Andres Freund
Author: Amit Kapila
Backpatch-through: 9.6
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/20181027104138.qmbbelopvy7cw...@alap3.anarazel.de
Branch
--
master
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff
postmaster
startup.
Reported-by: Andres Freund
Author: Amit Kapila
Backpatch-through: 9.6
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/20181027104138.qmbbelopvy7cw...@alap3.anarazel.de
Branch
--
REL9_6_STABLE
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/1a8bde490c982cbdd9d174e72d42f6042e9bf4ee
Fix the omission in docs.
Commit 5373bc2a08 has added type for background workers but forgot to
update at one place in the documentation.
Reported-by: John Naylor
Author: John Naylor
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila
Backpatch-through: 11
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m
Fix the omission in docs.
Commit 5373bc2a08 has added type for background workers but forgot to
update at one place in the documentation.
Reported-by: John Naylor
Author: John Naylor
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila
Backpatch-through: 11
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m
.
Diagnosed-by: Tom Lane
Author: Tom Lane and Amit Kapila
Backpatch-through: 9.6
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/11629.1536550...@sss.pgh.pa.us
Branch
--
master
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/9bc9f72b28fe4d2c22244f3443af8f1b98b56474
Modified Files
--
src/backend
.
Diagnosed-by: Tom Lane
Author: Tom Lane and Amit Kapila
Backpatch-through: 9.6
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/11629.1536550...@sss.pgh.pa.us
Branch
--
REL_10_STABLE
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/9718c93f532c3cfb6c39679452149dba711d12af
Modified Files
--
src
.
Diagnosed-by: Tom Lane
Author: Tom Lane and Amit Kapila
Backpatch-through: 9.6
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/11629.1536550...@sss.pgh.pa.us
Branch
--
REL9_6_STABLE
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/dca44d07c585637d8245a46a29be732241fa40bf
Modified Files
--
src
.
Diagnosed-by: Tom Lane
Author: Tom Lane and Amit Kapila
Backpatch-through: 9.6
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/11629.1536550...@sss.pgh.pa.us
Branch
--
REL_11_STABLE
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/ca5ca25d08710d7f5aaf0e390aae284bc594a6da
Modified Files
--
src
. This commit will test that aspect and can
lead to failure on some of the buildfarm machines which we will fix in the
later commit.
Author: Tom Lane and Amit Kapila
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/11629.1536550...@sss.pgh.pa.us
Branch
--
master
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff
don't have an easy
way to test it in prior versions. Another reason is that the hash-index
code is changed heavily in 10, so it is not advisable to push the fix
without testing it in prior versions.
Author: Amit Kapila
Reviewed-by: Yugo Nagata
Backpatch-through: 10
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m
don't have an easy
way to test it in prior versions. Another reason is that the hash-index
code is changed heavily in 10, so it is not advisable to push the fix
without testing it in prior versions.
Author: Amit Kapila
Reviewed-by: Yugo Nagata
Backpatch-through: 10
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m
don't have an easy
way to test it in prior versions. Another reason is that the hash-index
code is changed heavily in 10, so it is not advisable to push the fix
without testing it in prior versions.
Author: Amit Kapila
Reviewed-by: Yugo Nagata
Backpatch-through: 10
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m
them as parallel-restricted.
In the passing, improve the coding pattern in max_parallel_hazard_walker
so that it has a chain of mutually-exclusive if ... else if ... else if
... else if ... IsA tests.
Reported-by: Marko Tiikkaja
Bug: 15324
Author: Amit Kapila
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane
Backpatch
them as parallel-restricted.
In the passing, improve the coding pattern in max_parallel_hazard_walker
so that it has a chain of mutually-exclusive if ... else if ... else if
... else if ... IsA tests.
Reported-by: Marko Tiikkaja
Bug: 15324
Author: Amit Kapila
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane
Backpatch
them as parallel-restricted.
In the passing, improve the coding pattern in max_parallel_hazard_walker
so that it has a chain of mutually-exclusive if ... else if ... else if
... else if ... IsA tests.
Reported-by: Marko Tiikkaja
Bug: 15324
Author: Amit Kapila
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane
Backpatch
them as parallel-restricted.
In the passing, improve the coding pattern in max_parallel_hazard_walker
so that it has a chain of mutually-exclusive if ... else if ... else if
... else if ... IsA tests.
Reported-by: Marko Tiikkaja
Bug: 15324
Author: Amit Kapila
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane
Backpatch
in RecoveryInProgress code path.
Reported-by: Dilip Kumar
Author: Dilip Kumar
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier and Amit Kapila
Backpatch-through: 9.5
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/CAFiTN-u4BA8KXcQUWDPNgaKAjDXC=C2whnzBM8TAcv=stck...@mail.gmail.com
Branch
--
REL9_5_STABLE
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org
in RecoveryInProgress code path.
Reported-by: Dilip Kumar
Author: Dilip Kumar
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier and Amit Kapila
Backpatch-through: 9.5
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/CAFiTN-u4BA8KXcQUWDPNgaKAjDXC=C2whnzBM8TAcv=stck...@mail.gmail.com
Branch
--
REL_11_STABLE
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org
in RecoveryInProgress code path.
Reported-by: Dilip Kumar
Author: Dilip Kumar
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier and Amit Kapila
Backpatch-through: 9.5
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/CAFiTN-u4BA8KXcQUWDPNgaKAjDXC=C2whnzBM8TAcv=stck...@mail.gmail.com
Branch
--
REL9_6_STABLE
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org
in RecoveryInProgress code path.
Reported-by: Dilip Kumar
Author: Dilip Kumar
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier and Amit Kapila
Backpatch-through: 9.5
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/CAFiTN-u4BA8KXcQUWDPNgaKAjDXC=C2whnzBM8TAcv=stck...@mail.gmail.com
Branch
--
REL_10_STABLE
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org
in RecoveryInProgress code path.
Reported-by: Dilip Kumar
Author: Dilip Kumar
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier and Amit Kapila
Backpatch-through: 9.5
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/CAFiTN-u4BA8KXcQUWDPNgaKAjDXC=C2whnzBM8TAcv=stck...@mail.gmail.com
Branch
--
master
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg
Remove extra semicolons.
Reported-by: David Rowley
Author: David Rowley
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila
Backpatch-through: 10
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/cakjs1f8eneeyyzzvdjahvz6gbahfkhbsfb5m_c0y6tujs9d...@mail.gmail.com
Branch
--
master
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg
Remove extra semicolons.
Reported-by: David Rowley
Author: David Rowley
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila
Backpatch-through: 10
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/cakjs1f8eneeyyzzvdjahvz6gbahfkhbsfb5m_c0y6tujs9d...@mail.gmail.com
Branch
--
REL_11_STABLE
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg
Remove extra semicolons.
Reported-by: David Rowley
Author: David Rowley
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila
Backpatch-through: 10
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/cakjs1f8eneeyyzzvdjahvz6gbahfkhbsfb5m_c0y6tujs9d...@mail.gmail.com
Branch
--
REL_10_STABLE
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg
the existing statistics.
Author: Haribabu Kommi, with few additional changes by me
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier, Amit Kapila and Fujii Masao
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/cajrrpgcyh-gkfswyc6c661k6cknl0xknqvt0sqt2mfnmr4h...@mail.gmail.com
Branch
--
master
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org
it by ensuring that XLogInsertRecord performs a
recomputation when the given record is generated with FPW as off but
found that the flag has been turned on while actually inserting the
record.
Reported-by: Kyotaro Horiguchi
Author: Kyotaro Horiguchi
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila
Backpatch-through: 9.5 where
it by ensuring that XLogInsertRecord performs a
recomputation when the given record is generated with FPW as off but
found that the flag has been turned on while actually inserting the
record.
Reported-by: Kyotaro Horiguchi
Author: Kyotaro Horiguchi
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila
Backpatch-through: 9.5 where
it by ensuring that XLogInsertRecord performs a
recomputation when the given record is generated with FPW as off but
found that the flag has been turned on while actually inserting the
record.
Reported-by: Kyotaro Horiguchi
Author: Kyotaro Horiguchi
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila
Backpatch-through: 9.5 where
it by ensuring that XLogInsertRecord performs a
recomputation when the given record is generated with FPW as off but
found that the flag has been turned on while actually inserting the
record.
Reported-by: Kyotaro Horiguchi
Author: Kyotaro Horiguchi
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila
Backpatch-through: 9.5 where
it by ensuring that XLogInsertRecord performs a
recomputation when the given record is generated with FPW as off but
found that the flag has been turned on while actually inserting the
record.
Reported-by: Kyotaro Horiguchi
Author: Kyotaro Horiguchi
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila
Backpatch-through: 9.5 where
Back-patch "Fix parallel hash join path search."
Back-patch commit 655393a022bd653e2b48dbf20b69236981e35195 to 9.6. This
synchronizes the relavant code and helps in generating parallel paths in
some cases in 9.6. This also helps in back-patch of future patches where
we can get the same plan in
/OFFSET within sub-selects to workers.
Reported-by: Andrew Fletcher
Bug: 15324
Author: Amit Kapila
Reviewed-by: Dilip Kumar
Backpatch-through: 9.6
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/153417684333.10284.11356259990921828...@wrigleys.postgresql.org
Branch
--
REL_11_STABLE
Details
---
https
.
This was harmless code till now but with an upcoming feature where we don't
allow to create FSM for small tables, this will needlessly create FSM
files.
Author: John Naylor
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila
Discussion:
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/cajvsvgwvb13pzpbleecfugfc5v2fso736bsdtakpipacdmm
On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 11:18 AM Tom Lane wrote:
>
> Amit Kapila writes:
> > Yes, so this could be the cause of the problem. I think we need to
> > change the tests added by the patch such that they don't rely on
> > vacuum to remove dead-row versions? Do you or anybody
On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 8:17 AM Amit Kapila wrote:
>
> Avoid creation of the free space map for small heap relations.
>
It seems there is some failure due to this on build farm machines. I
will investigate!
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 10:25 AM Andrew Gierth
wrote:
>
> >>>>> "Amit" == Amit Kapila writes:
>
> Amit> One possibility is that autovacuum has triggered to perform
> Amit> truncation of some other relation (remove pages at the end) which
> Am
On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 11:10 AM Andrew Gierth
wrote:
>
> >>>>> "Amit" == Amit Kapila writes:
>
> Amit> Yes, so this could be the cause of the problem. I think we need
> Amit> to change the tests added by the patch such that they don't rely
>
On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 8:49 AM Amit Kapila wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 8:17 AM Amit Kapila wrote:
> >
> > Avoid creation of the free space map for small heap relations.
> >
>
> It seems there is some failure due to this on build farm machines. I
>
Revert "Avoid creation of the free space map for small heap relations."
This reverts commit ac88d2962a96a9c7e83d5acfc28fe49a72812086.
Branch
--
master
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/a23676503b746b7f1588cd2ab0c60411032d32da
Modified Files
--
. However, we miss to clear it when
we didn't find any pages to try from the map which leads to an assertion
failure when we later tried to use it after relation extension.
In the passing, I have improved some comments in this area.
Reported-by: Tom Lane based on buildfarm results
Author: Amit
has not been triggered to update FSM.
This commit updates the comments in code and documentation to reflect this
behavior.
Author: John Naylor
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/CACPNZCtba-3m1q3A8gxA_vxg=t7gqf7gmbpr4ciy5lnty-j...@mail.gmail.com
Branch
--
master
Details
Update copyright year in files added by 1bb5e78218.
Branch
--
master
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/f27314ff9a0eb60b75bb576c3629c8849f7698c1
Modified Files
--
src/backend/partitioning/partdesc.c | 2 +-
src/include/partitioning/partdesc.h | 2 +-
2 files
On Wed, Mar 6, 2019 at 11:31 PM Andres Freund wrote:
>
> tableam: introduce table AM infrastructure.
>
Thanks for this work. I noticed a few typos in this commit. The
patch for the same is attached.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
0001-
advantage of commit b0eaa4c51b where
we have avoided creation of the free space map for small heap relations.
Author: John Naylor
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/CACPNZCu4cOdm3uGnNEGXivy7Gz8UWyQjynDpdkPGabQ18_zK6g%40mail.gmail.com
Branch
--
master
Details
Improve code comments in b0eaa4c51b.
Author: John Naylor
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/CACPNZCswjyGJxTT=mxHgK=Z=mJ9uJ4WEx_UO=bnwpr_i0ea...@mail.gmail.com
Branch
--
master
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/06c8a5090ed9ec188557a86d4de11384f5128ec0
Modified Files
to another, there is a chance that another concurrent UPDATE or DELETE
misses this row. However, now we raise a serialization failure error in
such a case.
Reported-by: David Rowley
Author: David Rowley and Amit Kapila
Backpatch-through: 11 where it was introduced
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m
to another, there is a chance that another concurrent UPDATE or DELETE
misses this row. However, now we raise a serialization failure error in
such a case.
Reported-by: David Rowley
Author: David Rowley and Amit Kapila
Backpatch-through: 11 where it was introduced
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m
re-acquire locks in bufferId
order whereas the intention was to acquire in blockid order.
This commit ensures that we will always acquire locks on heap pages in
blockid order.
Reported-by: Nishant Fnu
Author: Nishant Fnu
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila and Robert Haas
Backpatch-through: 9.4
Discussion
re-acquire locks in bufferId
order whereas the intention was to acquire in blockid order.
This commit ensures that we will always acquire locks on heap pages in
blockid order.
Reported-by: Nishant Fnu
Author: Nishant Fnu
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila and Robert Haas
Backpatch-through: 9.4
Discussion
re-acquire locks in bufferId
order whereas the intention was to acquire in blockid order.
This commit ensures that we will always acquire locks on heap pages in
blockid order.
Reported-by: Nishant Fnu
Author: Nishant Fnu
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila and Robert Haas
Backpatch-through: 9.4
Discussion
re-acquire locks in bufferId
order whereas the intention was to acquire in blockid order.
This commit ensures that we will always acquire locks on heap pages in
blockid order.
Reported-by: Nishant Fnu
Author: Nishant Fnu
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila and Robert Haas
Backpatch-through: 9.4
Discussion
re-acquire locks in bufferId
order whereas the intention was to acquire in blockid order.
This commit ensures that we will always acquire locks on heap pages in
blockid order.
Reported-by: Nishant Fnu
Author: Nishant Fnu
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila and Robert Haas
Backpatch-through: 9.4
Discussion
re-acquire locks in bufferId
order whereas the intention was to acquire in blockid order.
This commit ensures that we will always acquire locks on heap pages in
blockid order.
Reported-by: Nishant Fnu
Author: Nishant Fnu
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila and Robert Haas
Backpatch-through: 9.4
Discussion
if somebody
deletes all the rows from the corresponding relation. We don't think it is
a useful optimization as it is quite likely that relation will again grow
to the same size.
Author: John Naylor, Amit Kapila
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila
Tested-by: Mithun C Y
Discussion:
https://www.postgresql.org
of tuples.
This commit removes the dependency on FSM contents.
Author: Amit Kapila
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/CAA4eK1KADF6K1bagr0--mGv3dMcZ%3DH_Z-Qtvdfbp5PjaC6PJJA%40mail.gmail.com
Branch
--
master
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff
fix, we need to
decide how we want to show all the transactions that are started internally
for various operations and that is a matter of separate patch.
Reported-by: Haribabu Kommi
Author: Haribabu Kommi
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila, Jamison Kirk and Rahila Syed
Backpatch-through: 9.6
Discussion
fix, we need to
decide how we want to show all the transactions that are started internally
for various operations and that is a matter of separate patch.
Reported-by: Haribabu Kommi
Author: Haribabu Kommi
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila, Jamison Kirk and Rahila Syed
Backpatch-through: 9.6
Discussion
fix, we need to
decide how we want to show all the transactions that are started internally
for various operations and that is a matter of separate patch.
Reported-by: Haribabu Kommi
Author: Haribabu Kommi
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila, Jamison Kirk and Rahila Syed
Backpatch-through: 9.6
Discussion
fix, we need to
decide how we want to show all the transactions that are started internally
for various operations and that is a matter of separate patch.
Reported-by: Haribabu Kommi
Author: Haribabu Kommi
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila, Jamison Kirk and Rahila Syed
Backpatch-through: 9.6
Discussion
Doc: fix incorrect references in PG 12 release notes.
Reported-by: Euler Taveira
Author: Euler Taveira
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/cahe3wgjia8ddnuzh9wqblxdruvvjdkkndhx-mkeg9uv+htp...@mail.gmail.com
Branch
--
master
Details
---
Fix typos.
Reported-by: Alexander Lakhin
Author: Alexander Lakhin
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila and Tom Lane
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/7208de98-add8-8537-91c0-f8b089e29...@gmail.com
Branch
--
master
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff
-by: Wu Fei
Author: Wu Fei
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila
Backpatch-through: 9.6
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/52E6E0843B9D774C8C73D6CF64402F0562215EB2@G08CNEXMBPEKD02.g08.fujitsu.local
Branch
--
master
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/d8261595bc6f5189896cdce6861915ac23830e7c
-by: Wu Fei
Author: Wu Fei
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila
Backpatch-through: 9.6
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/52E6E0843B9D774C8C73D6CF64402F0562215EB2@G08CNEXMBPEKD02.g08.fujitsu.local
Branch
--
REL9_6_STABLE
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff
-by: Wu Fei
Author: Wu Fei
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila
Backpatch-through: 9.6
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/52E6E0843B9D774C8C73D6CF64402F0562215EB2@G08CNEXMBPEKD02.g08.fujitsu.local
Branch
--
REL_11_STABLE
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff
-by: Wu Fei
Author: Wu Fei
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila
Backpatch-through: 9.6
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/52E6E0843B9D774C8C73D6CF64402F0562215EB2@G08CNEXMBPEKD02.g08.fujitsu.local
Branch
--
REL_10_STABLE
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff
Fix assorted inconsistencies.
There were a number of issues in the recent commits which include typos,
code and comments mismatch, leftover function declarations. Fix them.
Reported-by: Alexander Lakhin
Author: Alexander Lakhin, Amit Kapila and Amit Langote
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila
Discussion
Revert "Avoid the creation of the free space map for small heap relations".
This feature was using a process local map to track the first few blocks
in the relation. The map was reset each time we get the block with enough
freespace. It was discussed that it would be better to track this map on
On Tue, May 7, 2019 at 9:51 AM Tom Lane wrote:
>
> Amit Kapila writes:
> > On Tue, May 7, 2019 at 9:44 AM Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Shouldn't there be a catversion bump in this?
>
> > Won't the next vacuum run will create the FSM?
>
> If that's true, and if we do
t; Still needs text markup, links, word wrap, and indenting.
> >
> > You can see the browser version at:
> >
>
> Sorry, this is a better URL:
>
> http://momjian.us/pgsql_docs/release-12.html
>
Can you please remove below entry from release notes?
Avoid creati
1 - 100 of 1009 matches
Mail list logo