Bruce Momjian wrote:
Mikkel is right, every other well-organized mailing list I've ever been on
handles things the sensible way he suggests, but everybody on his side
who's been on lists here for a while already knows this issue is a dead
horse. Since I use the most advanced e-mail client
Angel Alvarez wrote:
What's such most advanced mail reader??
No one, ive seen, seems to be perfect nor thunderbird.
By the way kmail has 4 options (reply, reply to all, reply to author, reply to list)
in addition to be able to use list headers included in the message.
in fact many other
Angel Alvarez wrote:
Well
but the RFC's were in fact prior to thunderbird
So for he most of its life, when few people was using it,
Thiunderbird was a sad example of your botched attempt of creating a
standar of NOT FOLLOWING THE RFC's...
But, as I mentioned, nobody cares about this
I resent that you're trying to make this a personal thing.
I was going to answer the rest of this email, then I realized that the
real problem was right here, and discussing anything else was dancing
around the issue and wasting time.
You can resent it or not, but this _is_ a personal
] wrote:
On Friday 20 June 2008 1:19 pm, Collin Peters wrote:
I have a server of which the OS timezone is set to Pacific time
(currently -7). I run the following query on it
SELECTnow(), now() AT TIME ZONE 'GMT+10:00', now() AT TIME ZONE
'GMT-10:00', now() AT TIME ZONE 'Australia
- CORRECT)
Am I missing something obvious? Seems when I specify GMT+10:00 it
returns GMT-10:00 and vice versa. Note that column 2 3 are
timestamp withOUT timezone while 1 4 are timestamp WITH timezone.
But I still see this as totally wrong.
Regards,
Collin Peters
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing
with this table yet?
On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 5:47 PM, Collin Peters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all - I am wondering if I can get a consensus on what to do about
this minor issue. I have looked through the archives and can't find a
definitive answer.
So I have a new 8.1 install on Linux (have not yet been
analyzes anymore unless autovacuum
is off.
So I am looking for the definitive answer on this. Is pgAdmin wrong
and I should ignore the messages? Is autovacuum not fully running?
Do they just have different threshold values and pgadmin is a bit
pickier?
Regards,
Collin
--
Sent via pgsql-general
But make it hostssl instead of host, to require some cryptography
in the channel used, specially to authenticate the connection.
Opening your access to everyone without crypto sounds like something
you don't want to do. Specially if users can change their own
passwords...
My
Lewis Cunningham wrote:
--- Gregory Stark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
pgsql-hackers
pgsql-users
There really aren't any other groups of people. people who want to
talk about
There are hackers (contribute to PostgreSQL), DBAs (administer the
database), Developers (write application to
Magicloud Wang wrote:
Dear,
I think database has its own operation journal, and different journal
filesystem does give different performance. So if I put database file on a
non-journal filesystem, would it be safe? Does this like using a raw device?
You lose a little bit of data
Scott Marlowe wrote:
On Dec 11, 2007 11:41 AM, Leif B. Kristensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It certainly isn't a crime. But it's a bit like thread hijacking in the
sense that a well-formed inline posting is more likely to attract
intelligent replies. I don't think that I'm the only one who
Geoffrey wrote:
Collin Kidder wrote:
I have to suffer through dealing with people like the two of you
quoted above. You can deal with people who'd like to top post.
Anything else is just being a spoiled baby who can't deal with minor
issues. If all the energy spent crying about top posting
I felt I was 'responding in kind' wrt 'it really irritates me when
people cry like 4 year olds about top posting. It's not that bad, get
over it.' posting. My apologies if I've taken it to a level of rude
that it had not already reached.
I suppose that the post was probably directed
I agree with Joshua on this point. It's entirely possible to discuss
this without resorting to immaturity. If you make a decent point, then
diminish it by cursing or insulting everybody here, you've lost the
point and it's effectiveness entirely.
Yes, once again, I apologize. At times I
My point is: with top-posting I don't care how many lines were repeated
because I don't have to scroll.
Considering there is an RFC that recommends inline posting over
top-posting (http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1855), and considering the
fact that this topic has been beat to death on
This is offtopic but there is nothing wrong with top posting. Is there a
mail list policy on it or are you just picky about it?
Scott Marlowe wrote:
On 11/6/07, Reg Me Please [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That seems not to be the case.
The last line has a \. by its own and the last but one is
What about Perl? DBI? Not sure if it supports PervasiveSQL
The OP stated he already had ODBC connectors setup.
Yes, I already have ODBC setup. I'm basically just writing a little
something myself that uses the existing Pervasive and Postgres tools as
much as possible.
On a
Well, the subject says it pretty well but to elaborate:
I have a database from our ERP package that uses btrieve (PervasiveSQL)
for it's database engine. I'd like to transition all of the data to
PostgreSQL. I've been having trouble finding a suitable program to
automatically get all of the
around in pgAdmin it still prompts me to vacuum for many of
the tables. I am wondering if there are any sites that tell me the
ins-n-outs of autovacuuming.
Regards,
Collin
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map
).
Regards,
Collin
-
-- Table: pp_users
-- DROP TABLE pp_users;
CREATE TABLE pp_users
(
user_id serial NOT NULL,
title varchar(10),
firstname varchar(40) NOT NULL,
lastname varchar(40) NOT NULL,
shortname varchar(20) NOT NULL,
username varchar(20),
password varchar(40
database... overwrite it with the development
database... then copy all your real data back into the release database
(this last step is probably quite difficult)
-Perhaps some combination of the two
Does anybody have any recommendations?
Regards,
Collin Peters
---(end
I am just trying to connect locally. Only one machine involved. Is
there a way to tell what port the postmaster is running on if it is
running at all.
Collin
On Sun, 8 Oct 2000 10:55:32 +0200, Jarmo Paavilainen said:
I'm having problems starting postgres. What happens
? Another
strange thing is that TOP reports the running process to be
/usr/local/pgsql/bin instead of /usr/local/pgsql/bin/postmaster which is
the way I remember it running before.
Collin Peters
24 matches
Mail list logo
