Hello,
On Sun, 9 Mar 2008 11:59:49 -0700 Josh Berkus wrote:
I have no problem with having a policy or following a policy. My
problem is: Where is it? When was the last time someone's blog was
booted from planetpostgresql? Is it documented, i.e. an open
discussed event?
Lewis,
I have no problem with having a policy or following a policy. My
problem is: Where is it? When was the last time someone's blog was
booted from planetpostgresql? Is it documented, i.e. an open
discussed event?
Actually, the policy was discussed on pgsql-www mailing list in
Lewis,
On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 3:13 AM, Lewis Cunningham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My problem is not even so much the feed. I know how to use yahoo
pipes and feedburner to create a custom feed. The problem is two
fold. First, this is supposed to be a community aggregator and a
single
Dave Page wrote:
Well there's a major part of your misunderstanding.
planetpostgresql.org IS NOT a community project. It is a project
started and run by a very well liked and respected community member
(with the assistance of a few others), that the community - read web
team, plus others -
Guy Rouillier [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Dave Page wrote:
Well there's a major part of your misunderstanding.
planetpostgresql.org IS NOT a community project. It is a project
started and run by a very well liked and respected community member
(with the assistance of a few others), that the
Err, no. That is also not a postgresql.org website. Let me clarify, so
JD doesn't slap my wrists again.
Official PostgreSQL project sites/services are deployed under the
postgresql.org domain, having been agreed upon by -www or the sysadmin
team. We have a policy of not using alternate domain
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 08 Mar 2008 15:39:32 -0500
Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Guy Rouillier [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Dave Page wrote:
Well there's a major part of your misunderstanding.
planetpostgresql.org IS NOT a community project. It is a project
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 8 Mar 2008 20:57:28 +
Dave Page [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Err, no. That is also not a postgresql.org website. Let me clarify, so
JD doesn't slap my wrists again.
Official PostgreSQL project sites/services are deployed under the
Hi,
Either please change the subject, or let's move this discussion to -www,
with a different subject.
Thanks.
--
Devrim GÜNDÜZ , RHCE
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
Managed Services, Shared and Dedicated Hosting
Co-Authors: plPHP, ODBCng -
Tom Lane wrote:
Guy Rouillier [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
And with the new exception of the community documentation recently
started at http://www.postgresqldocs.org.
Which in fact has got only the weakest claim to be a community
project. If it actually were such, in the sense of having been
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 08 Mar 2008 19:27:43 -0500
Guy Rouillier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The only thing I think I have a right to ask is that whatever
contributions I may make not be a waste of effort because the PG
decision-makers have decided that a certain
On Sat, 8 Mar 2008, Guy Rouillier wrote:
The only thing I think I have a right to ask is that whatever
contributions I may make not be a waste of effort because the PG
decision-makers have decided that a certain repository is now
official, and the previous one is defunct.
Contributions to
Apparently Command Prompt and Devrim GÜNDÜZ own planetpostgresql.org
and can arbitrarily decide to remove your blog from planetpostgresql.
I, and several others, received an email telling us that we we were
not meeting the (unpublished) requirements for blog display length.
Try telling blogger
Lewis,
PlanetPostgrSQL.org is listed on the postgresql.org home page and
should be controlled by more than a single individual. If this is a
project that is policed and controlled solely by Devrim (as intimated
by Joshua Drake, to me, in an email), then it should be removed from
the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 7 Mar 2008 13:42:51 -0800 (PST)
Lewis Cunningham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Apparently Command Prompt and Devrim GÜNDÜZ own planetpostgresql.org
and can arbitrarily decide to remove your blog from planetpostgresql.
Lewis, as I politely
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 7 Mar 2008 13:56:30 -0800
Josh Berkus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Lewis,
PlanetPostgrSQL.org is listed on the postgresql.org home page and
should be controlled by more than a single individual. If this is a
project that is policed and
Hi,
On Fri, 2008-03-07 at 13:56 -0800, Josh Berkus wrote:
He's also not the sole admin of planetpostgresql.org.
I am.
Regards,
--
Devrim GÜNDÜZ , RHCE
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
Managed Services, Shared and Dedicated Hosting
Co-Authors: plPHP, ODBCng
Hi,
On Fri, 2008-03-07 at 13:42 -0800, Lewis Cunningham wrote:
Of course, this comes just days after Devrim and I had a disagreement
about being restricted to using OSS tools or not for presenting at an
OSS conference. Coincidence?
I don't care about the rest of your post that much, but
Devrim,
He's also not the sole admin of planetpostgresql.org.
I am.
Really? I thought Robert had rights. Well, it's obviously never been an
issue before.
Lewis, from the sound of it, you just need to put less text in your
excerpt portion of your posts. Is that correct, Devrim?
--
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 7 Mar 2008 14:16:19 -0800
Josh Berkus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Devrim,
He's also not the sole admin of planetpostgresql.org.
I am.
Really? I thought Robert had rights. Well, it's obviously never
been an issue before.
Robert
Hi,
On Fri, 2008-03-07 at 14:16 -0800, Josh Berkus wrote:
He's also not the sole admin of planetpostgresql.org.
I am.
Really? I thought Robert had rights. Well, it's obviously never been
an issue before.
Well, technically all community sysadmins has full access to that box,
but it
Devrim,
Well, technically all community sysadmins has full access to that box,
but it does not mean that they are administrating Planet PostgreSQL.
Nope, but it does cover us if you get sick or something.
Exactly. Like your blog, Joshua's blog, Hubert's blog, etc. If a blog
software does
Hi,
On Fri, 2008-03-07 at 14:24 -0800, Josh Berkus wrote:
Well, technically all community sysadmins has full access to that
box,
but it does not mean that they are administrating Planet PostgreSQL.
Nope, but it does cover us if you get sick or something.
I'm not talking about the
Hi,
On Fri, 2008-03-07 at 14:26 -0800, Devrim GÜNDÜZ wrote:
Nope, but it does cover us if you get sick or something.
I'm not talking about the technical issues -- I'm talking about the
policy stuff.
BTW: When someone wants to land Planet PostgreSQL, I forward this
request to planet
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 7 Mar 2008 14:30:18 -0800 (PST)
Lewis Cunningham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have no problem with having a policy or following a policy. My
problem is: Where is it? When was the last time someone's blog was
booted from planetpostgresql?
25 matches
Mail list logo
