On Tue, Feb 22, 2022 at 3:03 PM Peter Smith wrote:
>
> ~~~
>
> 1. worker.c - comment
>
> + subform = (Form_pg_subscription) GETSTRUCT(tup);
> +
> + /*
> + * We would not be here unless this subscription's disableonerr field was
> + * true, but check whether that field has changed in the interim.
At Wed, 23 Feb 2022 02:58:07 +, "Imseih (AWS), Sami"
wrote in
> >Ooh, nice find and diagnosys. I can confirm that the test fails as you
> >described without the code fix, and doesn't fail with it.
>
> >I attach the same patch, with the test file put in its final place
> >
On Thu, Feb 24, 2022 9:33 AM Masahiko Sawada wrote:
>
> Thank you for the comments! I've attached the latest version patch
> that incorporated all comments I got so far. The primary change from
> the previous version is that the subscription statistics live globally
> rather than per-database.
>
On Mon, Feb 21, 2022 at 5:41 PM Euler Taveira wrote:
>
> Logical replication has been used to migration with minimal downtime. However,
> if you are dealing with a big database, the amount of required resources (disk
> -- due to WAL retention) increases as the backlog (WAL) increases. Unless you
On Fri, Feb 18, 2022 at 10:48 PM Simon Riggs
wrote:
>
> On Thu, 17 Feb 2022 at 17:55, Sadhuprasad Patro wrote:
> >
> > > On Sat, Feb 12, 2022 at 2:35 AM Robert Haas wrote:
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Imagine that I am using the "foo" tableam with "compression=lots" and
> > >> I want to switch to the
On Wed, Feb 23, 2022 at 09:52:02AM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> Thanks, so you are okay with me pushing that patch just to HEAD.
Yes, I am fine with that. I am wondering about patching the second
function though, to avoid any risk of forgetting it, but I am fine to
leave that to your judgement.
At Thu, 24 Feb 2022 14:44:56 +0900 (JST), Kyotaro Horiguchi
wrote in
> At Tue, 22 Feb 2022 09:59:09 +0100, Daniel Gustafsson wrote
> in
> > The section in question was added to our docs 22 years ago, to make it
> > reflect
> > the current operating systems in use maybe just not mentioning
On Wed, Feb 23, 2022 at 3:30 PM Etsuro Fujita wrote:
> Attached is an updated patch.
> Barring objections, I’ll commit
> the patch.
I have committed the patch. I think the 0003 patch needs rebase.
I'll update the patch.
Best regards,
Etsuro Fujita
At Tue, 22 Feb 2022 09:59:09 +0100, Daniel Gustafsson wrote
in
> > On 22 Feb 2022, at 07:14, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
>
> > Anyway, don't we use the -ftabstop option flag to silence compiler?
> > The warning is contradicting our convention. The attached adds that
> > flag.
>
> Isn't this
At Mon, 21 Feb 2022 17:19:48 -0800, Nathan Bossart
wrote in
> I also spent some time investigating whether durably renaming the archive
> status files was even necessary. In theory, it shouldn't be. If a crash
> happens before the rename is persisted, we might try to re-archive files,
> but
Thanks for your comment!
Sorry, I did not attach the patch file.
This patch focas on master branch.
Best regards,
On Thu, 24 Feb 2022 12:15:55 +0900 (JST)
Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I found messages inserted a space before the "%" in pgbench.
> > I think this is typo because there
On Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 7:03 AM Masahiko Sawada wrote:
>
> > ~~~
> >
> > 6. doc/src/sgml/monitoring.sgml - why two counters?
> >
> > Please forgive this noob question...
> >
> > I see there are 2 error_count columns (one for each kind of worker)
> > but I was wondering why it is useful for users
> Hi,
>
> I found messages inserted a space before the "%" in pgbench.
> I think this is typo because there are no space before the "%" in other
> messages.
> What do you think?
I think you are right. In English there's should be no space between number and
"%".
AFAIK other parts of
Hi Aleksander,
>That's great!
Thanks!
>Maybe the first implementation shouldn't be perfect as long as known
>limitations are documented and the future improvements are unlikely to
>break anything for the users. Committing an MVP and iterating on this is
>much simpler in terms of development and
On Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 1:33 PM Amit Kapila wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 7:57 AM Peter Smith wrote:
> >
> > I noticed that there was a build-farm failure on the machine 'komodoensis'
> > [1]
> >
> > # Failed test 'check replicated rows to tab_rowfilter_toast'
> > # at
Hi,
I found messages inserted a space before the "%" in pgbench.
I think this is typo because there are no space before the "%" in other
messages.
What do you think?
diff --git a/src/bin/pgbench/pgbench.c b/src/bin/pgbench/pgbench.c
index f166a77e3a..4ebe5e6ea4 100644
---
On Wednesday, February 23, 2022 6:52 PM Tang, Haiying/唐 海英
wrote:
> I have a comment on v21 patch.
>
> I wonder if we really need subscription s2 in 028_disable_on_error.pl. I
> think for
> subscription s2, we only tested some normal cases(which could be tested with
> s1), and didn't test any
On Wed, Feb 23, 2022 at 7:42 PM Joseph Koshakow wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I noticed something odd when going through some
> of the Interval code. The DAYS_PER_YEAR constant
> is defined in src/include/datatype/timestamp.h.
> > #define DAYS_PER_YEAR365.25/* assumes leap year every four years
Dear Fujii-san,
Thank you for your quick reviewing! I attached new version.
I found previous patches have wrong name. Sorry.
> The connection check timer is re-scheduled repeatedly even while the backend
> is
> in idle state or is running a local transaction that doesn't access to any
>
On Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 7:57 AM Peter Smith wrote:
>
> I noticed that there was a build-farm failure on the machine 'komodoensis' [1]
>
> # Failed test 'check replicated rows to tab_rowfilter_toast'
> # at t/028_row_filter.pl line 687.
> # got: ''
> # expected: 't|1'
> # Looks
> You can give it for multiple tables. See below as an example:
Thank you very much. I understood.
Regards,
Noriyoshi Shinoda
-Original Message-
From: Amit Kapila
Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2022 11:25 AM
To: Shinoda, Noriyoshi (PN Japan FSIP)
Cc: Euler Taveira ;
I noticed that there was a build-farm failure on the machine 'komodoensis' [1]
# Failed test 'check replicated rows to tab_rowfilter_toast'
# at t/028_row_filter.pl line 687.
# got: ''
# expected: 't|1'
# Looks like you failed 1 test of 20.
[18:21:24] t/028_row_filter.pl
On Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 7:43 AM Shinoda, Noriyoshi (PN Japan FSIP)
wrote:
>
> Hi,
> Thank you for developing of the great feature.
> If multiple tables are specified when creating a PUBLICATION,
> is it supposed that the WHERE clause condition is given to only one table?
>
You can give it for
Hi,
Thank you for developing of the great feature.
If multiple tables are specified when creating a PUBLICATION,
is it supposed that the WHERE clause condition is given to only one table?
I attached the operation log below.
--- operation log ---
postgres=> CREATE TABLE data1(c1 INT PRIMARY
On Mon, Feb 21, 2022 at 12:45 PM osumi.takami...@fujitsu.com
wrote:
>
> On Saturday, February 19, 2022 12:00 AM osumi.takami...@fujitsu.com
> wrote:
> > On Friday, February 18, 2022 3:34 PM Tang, Haiying/唐 海英
> > wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 8:35 PM osumi.takami...@fujitsu.com
> > >
Peter Eisentraut writes:
> On 23.02.22 23:58, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Peter Eisentraut writes:
>>> libpq TAP tests should be in src/interfaces/libpq/t/.
>> That's failing to account for the fact that a libpq test can't
>> really be a pure-perl TAP test; you need some C code to drive the
>> library.
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 23, 2022 at 12:08 PM Peter Smith wrote:
>
> Hi. Below are my review comments for the v1 patch.
Thank you for the comments! I've attached the latest version patch
that incorporated all comments I got so far. The primary change from
the previous version is that the subscription
Hi all,
I noticed something odd when going through some
of the Interval code. The DAYS_PER_YEAR constant
is defined in src/include/datatype/timestamp.h.
> #define DAYS_PER_YEAR365.25/* assumes leap year every four years */
We execute the EXTRACT and date_part functions in
Hi all,
Stephen pointed out [1] that the authenticated identity that's stored
in MyProcPort can't be retrieved by extensions or triggers. Attached is
a patch that provides both a C API and a SQL function for retrieving
it.
GetAuthenticatedIdentityString() is a mouthful but I wanted to
On 23.02.22 23:58, Tom Lane wrote:
Peter Eisentraut writes:
On 23.02.22 21:30, Andres Freund wrote:
Where would we want that test to live? Right now we have the slightly odd
convention that some tap tests live in src/test/{misc,modules,...}. But
e.g. frontend binary ones are below src/bin/.
On Wed, 2022-02-23 at 14:11 -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> On 2/23/22 13:38, Jacob Champion wrote:
> >
> > If this looks good, I'm not sure how best to test it in the regression
> > suite. I see that libpq has an installcheck recipe that compiles a test
> > executable for URI parsing; should I
I wrote:
> However ... in the wake of 618c16707, I wonder if we should consider
> an alternative definition, which is to NOT clear errorMessage when
> starting a new pipelined query. (That would be this patch minus
> the addition to pqPipelineProcessQueue.) Thanks to 618c16707,
> the returned
Peter Eisentraut writes:
> On 23.02.22 21:30, Andres Freund wrote:
>> Where would we want that test to live? Right now we have the slightly odd
>> convention that some tap tests live in src/test/{misc,modules,...}. But
>> e.g. frontend binary ones are below src/bin/.
> libpq TAP tests should be
Dean Rasheed writes:
> On Wed, 23 Feb 2022 at 20:55, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I'm +1 on 0001 and 0002, but 0003 feels
>> a bit ad-hoc. It certainly *looks* weird for the allegedly faster
>> function to be handing off to the allegedly slower one. I also wonder
>> if we're leaving anything on the
On 23.02.22 21:30, Andres Freund wrote:
hen verifying that the meson port actually runs all perl based tests I came
across src/interfaces/libpq/test/regress.pl. Instead of running tests yet
another way, it seems better to convert it to a tap test.
I hope others agree?
Where would we want that
On Wed, 23 Feb 2022 at 20:55, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> I took a quick look through these (just eyeball, didn't try to verify
> your performance statements).
Thanks for looking!
> I'm +1 on 0001 and 0002, but 0003 feels
> a bit ad-hoc. It certainly *looks* weird for the allegedly faster
> function
Hi all,
On Thu, Feb 17, 2022 at 11:25 AM samay sharma
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I wanted to submit a patch to expose 2 new hooks (one for the
> authentication check and another one for error reporting) in auth.c. These
> will allow users to implement their own authentication methods for Postgres
>
On Wed, Feb 23, 2022, at 4:18 PM, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> On 2/23/22 18:33, Euler Taveira wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 23, 2022, at 1:07 PM, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> >> Maybe, but I don't think it's very common to have that many
> >> schemas added to the same publication. And it probably does not
> >> make
Daniel Gustafsson writes:
> In pg_regress we realloc() with the destination and source pointer being
> equal,
> without checking for OOM. While a fairly unlikely source of errors, is there
> a
> reason not to use pg_realloc() there for hygiene?
Yeah, looks like oversight to me.
Alvaro Herrera writes:
> On 2022-Feb-23, Andres Freund wrote:
>> Separately: I don't really understand why we do the whole if USE_PGXS dance
>> in
>> src/test/modules?
> Yeah, it seems a bit silly. I'm not opposed to making these makefiles
> unconditionally do the PGXS thing -- or the non-PGXS
On 2/23/22 16:16, Andres Freund wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2022-02-23 15:57:08 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Andrew Dunstan writes:
>>> On 2/23/22 15:30, Andres Freund wrote:
Perhaps we should just rename src/test/modules/libpq_pipeline to
src/test/modules/libpq and move uri-regress in there as
On 2022-Feb-23, Andres Freund wrote:
> Separately: I don't really understand why we do the whole if USE_PGXS dance in
> src/test/modules?
Yeah, it seems a bit silly. I'm not opposed to making these makefiles
unconditionally do the PGXS thing -- or the non-PGXS thing, if that
makes it easier to
On 2022-Feb-23, Andres Freund wrote:
> When verifying that the meson port actually runs all perl based tests I came
> across src/interfaces/libpq/test/regress.pl. Instead of running tests yet
> another way, it seems better to convert it to a tap test.
>
> I hope others agree?
WFM.
> Perhaps
In pg_regress we realloc() with the destination and source pointer being equal,
without checking for OOM. While a fairly unlikely source of errors, is there a
reason not to use pg_realloc() there for hygiene?
--
Daniel Gustafsson https://vmware.com/
pg_regress_realloc.diff
I brought this up in [1] but wanted to start a dedicated thread.
Since 16fa9b2b30a357 GiST indexes are not built in shared buffers.
However, smgrimmedsync() is not done anywhere and skipFsync=true is
always passed to smgrwrite() and smgrextend(). So, if a checkpoint
starts and finishes after
Hi,
On 2022-02-23 15:57:08 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan writes:
> > On 2/23/22 15:30, Andres Freund wrote:
> >> Perhaps we should just rename src/test/modules/libpq_pipeline to
> >> src/test/modules/libpq and move uri-regress in there as well?
>
> > WFM
>
> +1
Cool.
One question
Andrew Dunstan writes:
> On 2/23/22 15:30, Andres Freund wrote:
>> Perhaps we should just rename src/test/modules/libpq_pipeline to
>> src/test/modules/libpq and move uri-regress in there as well?
> WFM
+1
regards, tom lane
Dean Rasheed writes:
> Attached are 3 small patches that improve the performance of numeric
> division. Patch 0002 seems to have the biggest impact, but I think
> they're all worth including, since they're quite simple changes, with
> noticeable performance gains.
I took a quick look through
> On 23 Feb 2022, at 21:30, Andres Freund wrote:
> When verifying that the meson port actually runs all perl based tests I came
> across src/interfaces/libpq/test/regress.pl. Instead of running tests yet
> another way, it seems better to convert it to a tap test.
>
> I hope others agree?
Many
On 2/23/22 15:30, Andres Freund wrote:
> Hi,
>
> When verifying that the meson port actually runs all perl based tests I came
> across src/interfaces/libpq/test/regress.pl. Instead of running tests yet
> another way, it seems better to convert it to a tap test.
>
> I hope others agree?
yes
Hi,
When verifying that the meson port actually runs all perl based tests I came
across src/interfaces/libpq/test/regress.pl. Instead of running tests yet
another way, it seems better to convert it to a tap test.
I hope others agree?
Where would we want that test to live? Right now we have the
On Wed, Feb 23, 2022, at 15:23, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> Yeah, I have several others on bitbucket that might be of interest (in
> varying states of doneness):
Thanks, added.
/Joel
> On 22 Feb 2022, at 02:13, Michael Paquier wrote:
> The patch set looks fine overall.
Thanks for reviewing and testing, I pushed this today after taking another
round at it.
--
Daniel Gustafsson https://vmware.com/
On Wed, 23 Feb 2022 at 15:24, Nitin Jadhav
wrote:
>
> > At least for pg_stat_progress_checkpoint, storing only a timestamp in
> > the pg_stat storage (instead of repeatedly updating the field as a
> > duration) seems to provide much more precise measures of 'time
> > elapsed' for other sessions
I wrote:
> We could provide a simplified API in which SPI_start_transaction is
> automatically included for either success or failure, so that the caller
> doesn't have the delayed-cleanup responsibility. I'm not actually sure
> that there is any situation where that couldn't be done, but putting
+ Whenever the checkpoint operation is running, the
+ pg_stat_progress_checkpoint view will contain a
+ single row indicating the progress of the checkpoint. The tables below
Maybe it should show a single row , unless the checkpointer isn't running at
all (like in single user mode).
+
On 2/23/22 03:25, Andres Freund wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2022-02-18 12:10:51 +1300, David Rowley wrote:
>> The other way I thought to fix it was by changing the logic for when
>> generation blocks are freed. In the problem case mentioned above, the
>> block being freed is the current block (which was
On 2/23/22 18:33, Euler Taveira wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 23, 2022, at 1:07 PM, Tomas Vondra wrote:
>> Maybe, but I don't think it's very common to have that many
>> schemas added to the same publication. And it probably does not
>> make much difference whether you have 1000 or 2000 items in the
>>
On Fri, Feb 18, 2022 at 5:23 PM Andres Freund wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On 2022-02-11 15:28:19 +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > On 05.02.22 20:59, Andres Freund wrote:
> > > On 2022-01-03 14:46:52 +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > > > From ec00dc6ab8bafefc00e9b1c78ac9348b643b8a87 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00
On 2/23/22 13:38, Jacob Champion wrote:
> Hello,
>
> As part of the NSS work it came up [1] that clients don't have a good
> way to ask libpq what SSL library it was compiled with, unless they
> already have a connection pointer so that they can call
> PQsslAttribute(conn, "library"). This poses
On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 08:27:02PM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> I have to wonder if there really *is* a use case for CLUSTER in the
> first place on regular tables, let alone on partitioned tables, which
> are likely to be large and thus take a lot of time. What justifies
> spending so much
On Wed, Feb 23, 2022 at 10:02 AM Imseih (AWS), Sami wrote:
> If the failsafe kicks in midway through a vacuum, the number indexes_total
> will not be reset to 0. If INDEX_CLEANUP is turned off, then the value will
> be 0 at the start of the vacuum.
The way that this works with num_index_scans
I think the change to ImmediateCheckpointRequested() makes no sense.
Before this patch, that function merely inquires whether there's an
immediate checkpoint queued. After this patch, it ... changes a
progress-reporting flag? I think it would make more sense to make the
progress-report flag
Hello,
As part of the NSS work it came up [1] that clients don't have a good
way to ask libpq what SSL library it was compiled with, unless they
already have a connection pointer so that they can call
PQsslAttribute(conn, "library"). This poses a chicken-and-egg problem:
with the NSS proposal,
+
+
+ indexes_total bigint
+
+
+ The number of indexes to be processed in the
+ vacuuming indexes or cleaning up
indexes phase
+ of the vacuum.
+
+
+
+
+
+
On Wed, Feb 23, 2022 at 12:59:59PM +0800, Julien Rouhaud wrote:
> To address that, I'd like to propose the possibility to include files in hba
> and ident configuration files. This was already discussed in the past, and in
> my understanding this is mostly wanted, while some people expressed
On Wed, Feb 23, 2022, at 1:07 PM, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> Maybe, but I don't think it's very common to have that many schemas
> added to the same publication. And it probably does not make much
> difference whether you have 1000 or 2000 items in the list - either both
> are acceptable or
On Wed, Feb 23, 2022, at 12:30 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Updating the patch is going to be a bit tedious, so I'm not
> going to do it without buy-in that this solution would be
> okay to commit. Any objections?
No. I was confused by the multiple log functions spread in the client programs
while I was
On Wed, 2022-02-23 at 16:28 +0100, Gunnar "Nick" Bluth wrote:
> I'm extremely unhappy that I called it "--config-file" here, while
> "postgres" itself wants "--config_file". But as the other dashed options
> of pg_rewind are, well, dashed and not underscored, it seemed to be
> better that the
On 2/23/22 11:40, Andres Freund wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2022-02-23 08:43:38 -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>> On 2/22/22 15:54, Andres Freund wrote:
>>> On 2022-02-22 15:10:30 -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
I'll be surprised if we can't come up with something cleaner than that.
>>> Suggestions?
>>
Hi,
On 2022-02-23 10:30:02 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> So I now propose modifying yesterday's patch thus:
>
> * Reinstantiate the PG_LOG_FATAL enum value, add support macros
> pg_log_fatal, pg_log_fatal_hint, pg_log_fatal_detail.
>
> * Define pg_fatal as pg_log_fatal + exit(1). (This would
Hi,
On 2022-02-23 08:43:38 -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
> On 2/22/22 15:54, Andres Freund wrote:
> > On 2022-02-22 15:10:30 -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> >> I'll be surprised if we can't come up with something cleaner than that.
> > Suggestions?
>
>
> If we just have the sig handler actions
+ if ((ckpt_flags &
+(CHECKPOINT_IS_SHUTDOWN | CHECKPOINT_END_OF_RECOVERY)) == 0)
+ {
This code (present at multiple places) looks a little ugly to me, what
we can do instead is add a macro probably named IsShutdownCheckpoint()
which does the above check and use it in
On 2/23/22 12:10, Amit Kapila wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 23, 2022 at 4:54 AM Tomas Vondra
> wrote:
>>
>> 7) This updates psql to do roughly the same thing as for tables, so \dRp
>> now list sequences added either directly or through schema, so you might
>> get footer like this:
>>
>> \dRp+
On Tue, Feb 22, 2022 at 08:50:07PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Mark Wong writes:
> > Take 3. :)
>
> > I've upgraded everyone to the v14 buildfarm scripts and made sure the
> > --test passed on HEAD on each one. So I hopefully didn't miss any
> > (other than the one EOL OpenSUSE version that I will
On 2/22/22 17:06, Andres Freund wrote:
>> What's involved in moving to require Unix socket support?
> It works today (the CI scripts use it on windows for example).
>
> But it's awkward because make_temp_sockdir() defaults to /tmp/ if TMPDIR isn't
> set. Which it is not by default on windows.
I wrote:
> Andres Freund writes:
>> What about adding a pg_fatal() that's pg_log_fatal() + exit()? That keeps
>> pg_log_* stuff "log only", but adds something adjacent enough to hopefully
>> reduce future misunderstandings?
> I'd be okay with that, except that pg_upgrade already has a pg_fatal
>
Hi!
During a Patroni PR discussion
(https://github.com/zalando/patroni/pull/2225), we realised that if one
wants to use the "-c" option on a typical Debian/Ubuntu installation
(where the config resides below /etc/postgresql/), pg_rewind needs a way
to be told where the postgresql.conf
On 2/23/22 09:52, Aleksander Alekseev wrote:
> What about scanning for "PG_MODULE_MAGIC"?
An extension can be written without using C at all. BTW some extensions
[1] are written in Rust these days.
Sure, but scanning for PG_MODULE_MAGIC may well pick up repos that would
otherwise have been
Hi Joe,
> What about scanning for "PG_MODULE_MAGIC"?
An extension can be written without using C at all. BTW some extensions [1]
are written in Rust these days.
[1]: https://github.com/timescale/timescaledb-toolkit
--
Best regards,
Aleksander Alekseev
On 2/23/22 09:33, Euler Taveira wrote:
On Wed, Feb 23, 2022, at 6:00 AM, Joel Jacobson wrote:
On Fri, Feb 11, 2022, at 04:46, Noah Misch wrote:
> How did you make the list? (I'd imagine doing it by searching for
> repositories containing evidence like \bpgxs\b matches.)
Searching Github for
On Wed, Feb 23, 2022, at 6:00 AM, Joel Jacobson wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 11, 2022, at 04:46, Noah Misch wrote:
> > How did you make the list? (I'd imagine doing it by searching for
> > repositories containing evidence like \bpgxs\b matches.)
>
> Searching Github for repos with a *.control file in
> At least for pg_stat_progress_checkpoint, storing only a timestamp in
> the pg_stat storage (instead of repeatedly updating the field as a
> duration) seems to provide much more precise measures of 'time
> elapsed' for other sessions if one step of the checkpoint is taking a
> long time.
I am
On 2/23/22 03:52, Joel Jacobson wrote:
>
>> (e.g. I see three
>> instances of
>> blackhole_fdw listed, but not the original repo, which is not even on
>> GitHub) etc..
> Thanks, I've fixed blackhole_fdw manually:
>
> - https://bitbucket.org/adunstan/blackhole_fdw
> -
On 2/22/22 15:54, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2022-02-22 15:10:30 -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>> I'll be surprised if we can't come up with something cleaner than that.
> Suggestions?
If we just have the sig handler actions as:
diag("died: $_[0]");
done_testing();
we get:
ok 1
> On what basis have you classified the above into the various types of
> checkpoints? AFAIK, the first two types are based on what triggered
> the checkpoint (whether it was the checkpoint_timeout or maz_wal_size
> settings) while the third type indicates the force checkpoint that can
> happen
Attached are 3 small patches that improve the performance of numeric
division. Patch 0002 seems to have the biggest impact, but I think
they're all worth including, since they're quite simple changes, with
noticeable performance gains.
Patch 0001 vectorises the inner loop of div_var_fast(). This
> I will make use of pgstat_progress_update_multi_param() in the next
> patch to replace multiple calls to checkpoint_progress_update_param().
Fixed.
---
> > The other progress tables use [type]_total as column names for counter
> > targets (e.g. backup_total for backup_streamed, heap_blks_total
Hi Nathan,
Thanks for the reply. I did indeed read that document and it's a great
place to get started. But it doesn't quite answer my questions. Do you
personally have experience writing software in C++ that interacts with
Postgres?
On Tue, Feb 22, 2022, 23:07 Nathan Bossart wrote:
> On Tue,
On Wed, Feb 23, 2022 at 4:54 AM Tomas Vondra
wrote:
>
> 7) This updates psql to do roughly the same thing as for tables, so \dRp
> now list sequences added either directly or through schema, so you might
> get footer like this:
>
> \dRp+ testpub_mix
> ...
> Tables:
>
> On 21 Feb 2022, at 16:17, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> Looks OK.
Thanks, pushed.
--
Daniel Gustafsson https://vmware.com/
Hello,
I have created a patch that adds support for building Postgres for the
windows/arm64 platform using the MSVC toolchain. Following changes have
been included
1. Extend MSVC scripts to handle ARM64 platform.
2. Add arm64 definition of spin_delay function.
3. Exclude arm_acle.h import with
Hi Osumi-san,
I have a comment on v21 patch.
I wonder if we really need subscription s2 in 028_disable_on_error.pl. I think
for subscription s2, we only tested some normal cases(which could be tested
with s1),
and didn't test any error case, which means it wouldn't be automatically
disabled.
On Fri, Feb 11, 2022, at 04:46, Noah Misch wrote:
> How did you make the list? (I'd imagine doing it by searching for
> repositories containing evidence like \bpgxs\b matches.)
Searching Github for repos with a *.control file in the root dir and a Makefile
containing ^PGXS
Hmm, now that you
On Tue, Feb 22, 2022 at 9:17 AM wangw.f...@fujitsu.com
wrote:
>
> On Fri, Feb 18, 2022 at 10:51 AM Ajin Cherian wrote:
> > Some comments:
> Thanks for your review.
>
> > I see you only track skipped Inserts/Updates and Deletes. What about
> > DDL operations that are skipped, what about
On Fri, Feb 11, 2022, at 01:22, Ian Lawrence Barwick wrote:
> More precisely it's a list of all? the repositories with PostgreSQL
> extensions on
> GitHub?
Yes, the ambition is to list all repos at GitHub, and to manually add repos
hosted at GitLab and other places.
> OTOH not everything is on
On Tue, Feb 22, 2022, at 09:13, Aleksander Alekseev wrote:
> Hi Joel,
>
>> I've compiled a list of all* PostgreSQL EXTENSIONs in the world:
>
> The list is great. Thanks for doing this!
Glad to hear!
> Just curious, is it a one-time experiment or you are going to keep the
> list in an actual
97 matches
Mail list logo
