At Mon, 14 Mar 2022 09:39:48 +0900 (JST), Kyotaro Horiguchi
wrote in
> I'll examine the possibility to resolve this...
The existence of nfree and nalloc made me confused and I found the
reason.
In the case where a parittion collects many REUSE-ASSIGN-REMOVEed
elemetns from other paritiotns,
On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 10:45 AM Michael Paquier wrote:
>
> On Sun, Mar 13, 2022 at 02:58:58PM -0700, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 13, 2022 at 01:54:10PM +0530, Bharath Rupireddy wrote:
> >> Another thing I added in v2 is to not emit snapshot and mapping files
> >> stats in case of
On Sun, Mar 13, 2022 at 02:58:58PM -0700, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 13, 2022 at 01:54:10PM +0530, Bharath Rupireddy wrote:
>> Another thing I added in v2 is to not emit snapshot and mapping files
>> stats in case of restartpoint as logical decoding isn't supported on
>> standbys, so it
On Wed, Mar 09, 2022 at 10:50:45AM -0600, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> I also changed pg_ls_dir_recurse() to handle concurrent removal of a dir,
> which
> I noticed caused an infrequent failure on CI. However I'm not including that
> here, since the 2nd half of the patch set seems isn't ready due to
On Fri, Feb 25, 2022 at 5:52 PM Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> There is an important practical way in which it makes sense to treat
> 0001 as separate to 0002. It is true that 0001 is independently quite
> useful. In practical terms, I'd be quite happy to just get 0001 into
> Postgres 15, without 0002.
At Mon, 14 Mar 2022 11:30:02 +0900 (JST), Kyotaro Horiguchi
wrote in
> At Sat, 12 Mar 2022 14:33:32 -0800, Nathan Bossart
> wrote in
> > On Tue, Mar 08, 2022 at 06:01:23PM -0800, Andres Freund wrote:
> > > To me it's architecturally the completely wrong direction. We should move
> > > in
>
At Sat, 12 Mar 2022 14:33:32 -0800, Nathan Bossart
wrote in
> On Tue, Mar 08, 2022 at 06:01:23PM -0800, Andres Freund wrote:
> > To me it's architecturally the completely wrong direction. We should move in
> > the *other* direction, i.e. allow WAL to be sent to standbys before the
> > primary
On 2022-03-13 20:35:44 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund writes:
> > I was thinking that the way to use it would be to specify it as a client
> > option. Like PGOPTIONS='-c ignore_event_trigger=login' psql.
>
> Ugh ... that would allow people (at least superusers) to bypass
> the login
At Fri, 11 Mar 2022 15:39:13 -0500, Robert Haas wrote
in
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 9:38 PM Kyotaro Horiguchi
> wrote:
> > It seems to me too rigorous that pg_get_wal_records_info/stats()
> > reject future LSNs as end-LSN and I think WARNING or INFO and stop at
> > the real end-of-WAL is more
On Sat, Mar 12, 2022 at 4:00 PM Imseih (AWS), Sami wrote:
>
> > nitpick: Can we remove the extra spaces in the parentheses?
>
> fixed
>
> > What does it mean if there isn't an entry in the map? Is this actually
> > expected, or should we ERROR instead?
>
> I cleaned up the code here and added
At Fri, 11 Mar 2022 12:34:32 +0300, Yura Sokolov
wrote in
> В Пт, 11/03/2022 в 15:49 +0900, Kyotaro Horiguchi пишет:
> > At Fri, 11 Mar 2022 15:30:30 +0900 (JST), Kyotaro Horiguchi
> > > BufTableDelete(BufferTag *tagPtr, uint32 hashcode, bool
> > reuse)
> >
> > BufTableDelete considers both
At Fri, 11 Mar 2022 11:30:27 +0300, Yura Sokolov
wrote in
> В Пт, 11/03/2022 в 15:30 +0900, Kyotaro Horiguchi пишет:
> > At Thu, 03 Mar 2022 01:35:57 +0300, Yura Sokolov
> > wrote in
> > > В Вт, 01/03/2022 в 10:24 +0300, Yura Sokolov пишет:
> > > > Ok, here is v4.
> > >
> > > And here is
Andres Freund writes:
> I was thinking that the way to use it would be to specify it as a client
> option. Like PGOPTIONS='-c ignore_event_trigger=login' psql.
Ugh ... that would allow people (at least superusers) to bypass
the login trigger at will, which seems to me to break a lot of
the
Hi,
On 2022-03-13 19:57:08 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund writes:
> > On 2022-03-13 23:31:03 +0100, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
> >> Something like a '-c ignore_event_trigger=' GUC perhaps?
>
> > Did you mean login instead of event?
>
> > Something like it would work for me. It probably
Andres Freund writes:
> On 2022-03-13 23:31:03 +0100, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>> Something like a '-c ignore_event_trigger=' GUC perhaps?
> Did you mean login instead of event?
> Something like it would work for me. It probably should be
> GUC_DISALLOW_IN_FILE?
Why? Inserting such a setting
vignesh C writes:
> Here "pg_%" should be "pg_%%".
Right you are. Patch pushed, thanks!
regards, tom lane
Hi,
On 2022-03-13 23:31:03 +0100, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
> > On 12 Mar 2022, at 03:46, Andres Freund wrote:
>
> >> +
> >> + The login event occurs when a user logs in to the
> >> + system.
> >> + Any bugs in a trigger procedure for this event may prevent successful
> >> +
On Sun, Mar 13, 2022 at 3:27 PM Yura Sokolov
wrote:
> В Вс, 13/03/2022 в 07:05 -0700, Zhihong Yu пишет:
> >
> > Hi,
> > In the description:
> >
> > There is no need to hold both lock simultaneously.
> >
> > both lock -> both locks
>
> Thanks.
>
> > +* We also reset the usage_count since any
> On 12 Mar 2022, at 03:46, Andres Freund wrote:
>> +
>> + The login event occurs when a user logs in to the
>> + system.
>> + Any bugs in a trigger procedure for this event may prevent successful
>> + login to the system. Such bugs may be fixed after first restarting the
>> +
В Вс, 13/03/2022 в 07:05 -0700, Zhihong Yu пишет:
>
> Hi,
> In the description:
>
> There is no need to hold both lock simultaneously.
>
> both lock -> both locks
Thanks.
> +* We also reset the usage_count since any recency of use of the old
>
> recency of use -> recent use
Thanks.
>
On Sun, Mar 13, 2022 at 01:54:10PM +0530, Bharath Rupireddy wrote:
> Thanks for reviewing this. I agree with all of the above suggestions
> and incorporated them in the v2 patch.
Thanks for the new patch.
> Another thing I added in v2 is to not emit snapshot and mapping files
> stats in case of
On 2/9/22 08:22, Himanshu Upadhyaya wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 2, 2022 at 12:44 AM Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>>
>> rebased with some review comments attended to.
> I am in process of reviewing these patches, initially, have started
> with 0002-JSON_TABLE-v55.patch.
> Tested many different scenarios with
On Sat, Mar 12, 2022 at 3:15 PM Andres Freund wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On 2022-03-12 08:28:35 +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 12, 2022 at 2:14 AM Melanie Plageman
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > So, I noticed that pg_stat_reset_subscription_stats() wasn't working
> > > properly, and, upon further
Hi,
I noticed that the following commands "CREATE PUBLICATION pub1 FOR ALL
TABLES IN SCHEMA" and "ALTER PUBLICATION pub1 ADD ALL TABLES IN
SCHEMA" does not complete with the schema list. I feel this is because
of the following code in tab-complete.c:
.
On Sun, Mar 13, 2022 at 3:25 AM Yura Sokolov
wrote:
> В Пт, 11/03/2022 в 17:21 +0900, Kyotaro Horiguchi пишет:
> > At Fri, 11 Mar 2022 15:49:49 +0900 (JST), Kyotaro Horiguchi <
> horikyota@gmail.com> wrote in
> > > At Fri, 11 Mar 2022 15:30:30 +0900 (JST), Kyotaro Horiguchi <
>
On Mon, Feb 21, 2022 at 9:43 PM Zheng Li wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> One of the most frequently requested improvements from our customers
> is to reduce downtime associated with software updates (both major and
> minor versions). To do this, we have reviewed potential contributions to
> improving
On 09.03.2022 at 20:43, Brar Piening wrote:
Attached is a pretty huge patch that adds ids to all sections and all
the varlistentries where the containing variablelist already had at
least one id (plus a few additional ones that I stumbled upon and
deemed useful). It also adds html links next to
В Пт, 11/03/2022 в 17:21 +0900, Kyotaro Horiguchi пишет:
> At Fri, 11 Mar 2022 15:49:49 +0900 (JST), Kyotaro Horiguchi
> wrote in
> > At Fri, 11 Mar 2022 15:30:30 +0900 (JST), Kyotaro Horiguchi
> > wrote in
> > > Thanks! I looked into dynahash part.
> > >
> > > struct HASHHDR
> > > {
> >
Hi Alexander,
On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 3:40 PM Alexander Pyhalov
wrote:
> Etsuro Fujita писал 2021-08-30 12:52:
> > To allow async execution in a bit more cases, I modified the patch a
> > bit further: a ProjectionPath put directly above an async-capable
> > ForeignPath would also be considered
On Sat, Mar 12, 2022 at 10:02 AM David Zhang wrote:
> Applied patches v6-0002 and v6-0003 to master branch, and the `make check`
> test is ok.
>
> Here is my test result in 10 times average on 3 virtual machines:
> before the patches:
>
> abort.1 = 2.5473 ms
>
> abort.2 = 4.1572 ms
>
> after the
On Sat, Mar 12, 2022 at 1:35 AM Nathan Bossart wrote:
>
> +CheckpointStats.repl_map_cutoff_lsn = cutoff;
>
> Could we set repl_map_cutoff_lsn closer to where it is calculated? Right
> now, it's set at the bottom of the function just before the directory is
> freed. Is there a strong reason
31 matches
Mail list logo
