Op 5/7/23 om 05:37 schreef Jonathan S. Katz:
Attached is a draft of the release announcement for the upcoming update
release on May 11, 2023.
Please provide any suggestions, corrections, or notable omissions no
later than 2023-05-11 0:00 AoE.
'leak in within a' should be
'leak within a'
Hi,
On Sun, May 07, 2023 at 12:13:07AM +0200, Tomas Vondra wrote:
>
> c) ignore the issue - AFAICS this would be an issue only for (external)
> code accessing BrinMemTuple structs, but I don't think we're aware of
> any out-of-core BRIN opclasses or anything like that ...
FTR there's at least
I wrote:
> I think we could probably commit this, though I've not tried it
> in v15 yet.
Ping? The hours grow short, if we're to get this into 15.3.
regards, tom lane
Hi,
Attached is a draft of the release announcement for the upcoming update
release on May 11, 2023.
Please provide any suggestions, corrections, or notable omissions no
later than 2023-05-11 0:00 AoE.
Thanks,
Jonathan
The PostgreSQL Global Development Group has released an update to all
On Sat, May 06, 2023 at 12:35:40AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Indeed, there's not much in this patch ... but it's impossible to see
> how "run on an entirely new platform" isn't a new feature. Moreover,
> it's a platform that very few of us will have any ability to support
> or debug for. I can't
On 4/24/23 23:20, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> On 4/24/23 17:36, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> On 2023-Apr-23, Tomas Vondra wrote:
>>
>>> here's an updated version of the patch, including a backport version. I
>>> ended up making the code yet a bit closer to master by introducing
>>> add_values_to_range().
Hi!
Thank you, Damir, for your patch. It is very interesting to review it!
It seemed to me that the names of variables are not the same everywhere.
I noticed that you used /ignore_datatype_errors_specified/ variable in
/copy.c/ , but guc has a short name /ignore_datatype_errors/. Also you
On Sat, May 6, 2023 at 6:37 AM Shinya Kato
wrote:
> Hi, hackers
>
> When executing \du, you can see duplicates of the same role in 'member of'.
> This happens when admin | inherit | set options are granted by another
> role.
>
There is already an ongoing patch discussing the needed changes to
v5 attached.
On Thu, May 4, 2023 at 12:44 PM Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2023-04-27 11:36:49 -0400, Melanie Plageman wrote:
> > > > /* and finally tell the kernel to write the data to
> > > > storage */
> > > > reln = smgropen(currlocator, InvalidBackendId);
> > > >
Hi,
On 5/6/23 3:28 PM, Amit Kapila wrote:
On Sat, May 6, 2023 at 1:52 PM Drouvot, Bertrand
wrote:
There is 2 runs with this extra info in place:
A successful one: https://cirrus-ci.com/task/6528745436086272
A failed one: https://cirrus-ci.com/task/4558139312308224
Thanks, I think I got
Hi, hackers
When executing \du, you can see duplicates of the same role in 'member of'.
This happens when admin | inherit | set options are granted by another role.
---
postgres=# create role role_a login createrole;
CREATE ROLE
postgres=# \du
List of roles
On Sat, May 6, 2023 at 1:52 PM Drouvot, Bertrand
wrote:
>
> There is 2 runs with this extra info in place:
>
> A successful one: https://cirrus-ci.com/task/6528745436086272
> A failed one: https://cirrus-ci.com/task/4558139312308224
>
Thanks, I think I got some clue as to why this test is
On 5/5/23 15:54, Francisco Luis Arbelaez Lopez wrote:
If it matches your needs and objectives, I would like to receive more
information related to the next steps of this contribution.
If you want to contribute a patch for consideration, you would start by
sending it here (to this list) with
> On Sat, May 6, 2023 at 4:44 PM Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
>
>> Currently Window function nth_value is coded as following:
>>
>> nth = DatumGetInt32(WinGetFuncArgCurrent(winobj, 1, ));
>> if (isnull)
>> PG_RETURN_NULL();
>> const_offset =
> The last time this was discussed (
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/1037735.1610402426%40sss.pgh.pa.us)
> it was suggested to make the feature generalizable, beyond what the
> standard says it should be limited to.
I have read the mail. In my understanding nobody said that standard
On Sat, May 6, 2023 at 4:44 PM Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
> Currently Window function nth_value is coded as following:
>
> nth = DatumGetInt32(WinGetFuncArgCurrent(winobj, 1, ));
> if (isnull)
> PG_RETURN_NULL();
> const_offset =
Currently Window function nth_value is coded as following:
nth = DatumGetInt32(WinGetFuncArgCurrent(winobj, 1, ));
if (isnull)
PG_RETURN_NULL();
const_offset = get_fn_expr_arg_stable(fcinfo->flinfo, 1);
if (nth <= 0)
ereport(ERROR,
On Sat, 6 May 2023, 04:57 Tatsuo Ishii, wrote:
> Attached is the patch to implement this (on top of your patch).
>
> test=# SELECT row_number() RESPECT NULLS OVER () FROM (SELECT 1) AS s;
> ERROR: window function row_number cannot have RESPECT NULLS or IGNORE
> NULLS
>
The last time this was
Hi,
On 5/6/23 4:10 AM, Amit Kapila wrote:
On Fri, May 5, 2023 at 7:53 PM Drouvot, Bertrand
wrote:
On 5/5/23 2:28 PM, Amit Kapila wrote:
On Fri, May 5, 2023 at 5:36 PM Drouvot, Bertrand
So, even on a successful test, we can see that the WAL file we expect to be
removed on the standby has
19 matches
Mail list logo
