This is not a review, but I think the isolation tests should be
expanded. At least, include the case of serializable transactions being
involved.
--
Álvaro HerreraBreisgau, Deutschland — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
"Pensar que el espectro que vemos es ilusorio no lo despoja de
On Wed, Jul 13, 2022 at 1:05 PM Dmitry Koval wrote:
> Thanks you!
> I've fixed all things mentioned.
>
> --
> With best regards,
> Dmitry Koval
>
> Postgres Professional: http://postgrespro.com
Hi,
Toward the end of ATExecSplitPartition():
+ /* Unlock new partition. */
+
On Wed, Jul 13, 2022 at 11:28 AM Dmitry Koval
wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Patch stop applying due to changes in upstream.
> Here is a rebased version.
>
> --
> With best regards,
> Dmitry Koval
>
> Postgres Professional: http://postgrespro.com
Hi,
+attachPartTable(List **wqueue, Relation rel, Relation
On Wed, Jun 1, 2022 at 11:58 AM Dmitry Koval wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 1)
> > For attachPartTable, the parameter wqueue is missing from comment.
> > The parameters of CloneRowTriggersToPartition are called parent and
> partition.
> > I think it is better to name the parameters to attachPartTable in a
>
On Tue, May 31, 2022 at 1:43 PM Zhihong Yu wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, May 31, 2022 at 12:43 PM Dmitry Koval
> wrote:
>
>> >Just out of curiosity, why is SPLIT / MERGE support not included for
>> >HASH partitions? Because sibling partitions can have a different
>> >modulus, you should be able to
On Tue, May 31, 2022 at 12:43 PM Dmitry Koval
wrote:
> >Just out of curiosity, why is SPLIT / MERGE support not included for
> >HASH partitions? Because sibling partitions can have a different
> >modulus, you should be able to e.g. split a partition with (modulus,
> >remainder) of (3, 1)
I didn't read the patch, but what lock level does that place on the
partitioned table? Anything more than ACCESS SHARE?
Current patch locks a partitioned table with ACCESS EXCLUSIVE lock.
Unfortunately only this lock guarantees that other session can not work
with partitions that are
On Tue, 2022-05-31 at 12:32 +0300, Dmitry Koval wrote:
> There are not many commands in PostgreSQL for working with partitioned
> tables. This is an obstacle to their widespread use.
> Adding SPLIT PARTITION/MERGE PARTITIONS operations can make easier to
> use partitioned tables in PostgreSQL.
>
On Tue, 31 May 2022 at 11:33, Dmitry Koval wrote:
>
> Hi, hackers!
>
> There are not many commands in PostgreSQL for working with partitioned
> tables. This is an obstacle to their widespread use.
> Adding SPLIT PARTITION/MERGE PARTITIONS operations can make easier to
> use partitioned tables in
101 - 109 of 109 matches
Mail list logo