On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 11:05:04AM -0800, Andres Freund wrote:
> What about a define that forces external toasting very aggressively for
> catalog tables, iff they have a toast table? I suspect doing so for
> non-catalog tables as well would trigger test changes. Running a buildfarm
> animal with
On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 09:54:31AM -0800, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> +1
Okay, thanks. Done this part as of c0ee694 and 72b6098, then.
--
Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hi,
On 2023-01-10 02:57:43 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> No objections to back-patching the fix, but I wonder if we can find
> some mechanical way to prevent this sort of error in future.
What about a define that forces external toasting very aggressively for
catalog tables, iff they have a toast
On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 02:57:43AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Michael Paquier writes:
>> Any objections about getting 947789f applied to REL_13_STABLE and
>> REL_12_STABLE and see this issue completely gone from all the versions
>> supported?
>
> No objections to back-patching the fix...
+1
--
Michael Paquier writes:
> Any objections about getting 947789f applied to REL_13_STABLE and
> REL_12_STABLE and see this issue completely gone from all the versions
> supported?
No objections to back-patching the fix, but I wonder if we can find
some mechanical way to prevent this sort of error
Hi all,
The problem mentioned in $subject has been discussed here:
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/dm5pr0501mb38800d9e4605bca72dd35557cc...@dm5pr0501mb3880.namprd05.prod.outlook.com
Ths issue has been fixed by 947789f, without a backpatch to v12 (as
per 96cdeae) as the risk seemed rather
