Re: BUG #15307: Low numerical precision of (Co-) Variance

2018-10-06 Thread Dean Rasheed
On Wed, 3 Oct 2018 at 15:58, Madeleine Thompson wrote: > This diff looks good to me. Also, it applies cleanly against > abd9ca377d669a6e0560e854d7e987438d0e612e and passes `make > check-world`. > > I agree that this is not suitable for a patch release. > Pushed to master. Thanks for the review.

Re: BUG #15307: Low numerical precision of (Co-) Variance

2018-10-03 Thread Madeleine Thompson
On Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 9:04 AM Dean Rasheed wrote: > > On Thu, 27 Sep 2018 at 14:22, Dean Rasheed wrote: > > I'll post an updated patch in a while. > > > > I finally got round to looking at this again. Here is an update, based > on the review comments. > > The next question is whether or not to

Re: BUG #15307: Low numerical precision of (Co-) Variance

2018-10-03 Thread Tom Lane
Dean Rasheed writes: > The next question is whether or not to back-patch this. Although this > was reported as a bug, my inclination is to apply this to HEAD only, > based on the lack of prior complaints. That also matches our decision > for other similar patches, e.g., 7d9a4737c2. +1 for no

Re: BUG #15307: Low numerical precision of (Co-) Variance

2018-10-03 Thread Dean Rasheed
On Thu, 27 Sep 2018 at 14:22, Dean Rasheed wrote: > I'll post an updated patch in a while. > I finally got round to looking at this again. Here is an update, based on the review comments. The next question is whether or not to back-patch this. Although this was reported as a bug, my inclination

Re: BUG #15307: Low numerical precision of (Co-) Variance

2018-09-27 Thread Dean Rasheed
On 27 September 2018 at 06:12, Madeleine Thompson wrote: > This is my first PostgreSQL review. Hopefully I'm getting it right. I > independently ran into the bug in question and found that the author had > already written a patch. I'm happy the author wrote this. > Thanks for the review. And

Re: BUG #15307: Low numerical precision of (Co-) Variance

2018-09-26 Thread Madeleine Thompson
By the way, I did not see the discussion thread or notice that an author of the paper I mentioned and the reporter of the bug were the same person until after I wrote the review. Oops.

Re: BUG #15307: Low numerical precision of (Co-) Variance

2018-09-26 Thread Madeleine Thompson
The following review has been posted through the commitfest application: make installcheck-world: tested, passed Implements feature: tested, passed Spec compliant: not tested Documentation:not tested This is my first PostgreSQL review. Hopefully I'm getting it right.