On 12/21/23 07:37, Andres Freund wrote:
On 2023-12-20 13:11:37 -0400, David Steele wrote:
I've run this through a bunch of scenarios (in my head) with parallel
backups and it does seem to hold up.
I think we'd need to write the state file before XLOG_BACKUP_START just in
case. Seems better to
Hi,
On 2023-12-20 13:11:37 -0400, David Steele wrote:
> I've run this through a bunch of scenarios (in my head) with parallel
> backups and it does seem to hold up.
>
> I think we'd need to write the state file before XLOG_BACKUP_START just in
> case. Seems better to have an extra state file
On 12/18/23 10:39, Stephen Frost wrote:
Greetings,
* Stephen Frost (sfr...@snowman.net) wrote:
* Andres Freund (and...@anarazel.de) wrote:
I recently mentioned to Robert (and also Heikki earlier), that I think I see a
way to detect an omitted backup_label in a relevant subset of the cases
Greetings,
* Stephen Frost (sfr...@snowman.net) wrote:
> * Andres Freund (and...@anarazel.de) wrote:
> > I recently mentioned to Robert (and also Heikki earlier), that I think I
> > see a
> > way to detect an omitted backup_label in a relevant subset of the cases
> > (it'd
> > apply to the
Greetings,
* Andres Freund (and...@anarazel.de) wrote:
> I recently mentioned to Robert (and also Heikki earlier), that I think I see a
> way to detect an omitted backup_label in a relevant subset of the cases (it'd
> apply to the pg_control as well, if we moved to that). Robert encouraged me
>
Hi,
I recently mentioned to Robert (and also Heikki earlier), that I think I see a
way to detect an omitted backup_label in a relevant subset of the cases (it'd
apply to the pg_control as well, if we moved to that). Robert encouraged me
to share the idea, even though it does not provide complete
